IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Searching for Cobbles, Post Victoria Exploration
Floyd
post Sep 1 2008, 12:05 AM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 910
Joined: 4-September 06
From: Boston
Member No.: 1102



Well, since Opportunity has left Victoria Crater, it is time for a new thread.
To the next phase of exploration. wheel.gif wheel.gif wheel.gif May she find exotic cobbles and visit exciting new craters.
-Floyd


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Floyd
post Sep 1 2008, 02:22 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 910
Joined: 4-September 06
From: Boston
Member No.: 1102



According to the Planetary News Report of A.J.S. Rayl, Opportunity is ready rove. Due to wind gust on sols 1620 & 1633, and less tilt, she is up to 620 watt-hours from 370. Quoting from the report: ...Opportunity will soon begin the much-anticipated study of an assortment of cobbles on the plains, perhaps on a field of the intruder stones just to the north, though that is not yet set in Martian stone. "We haven't picked the first cobble yet," Squyres said, "but that's something we'll be thinking about in the next few days."


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Sep 2 2008, 04:59 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



Hehe... Well there sure are a lot of cobbles and ancient craters out there for the team to study. I can't wait to see where they go, next.


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BrianL
post Sep 3 2008, 05:30 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 530
Joined: 21-March 06
From: Canada
Member No.: 721



Would it be possible to get an old route map marked up with notable cobble sightings? Give us an idea of where they might be headed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Sep 3 2008, 07:19 PM
Post #5


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



The Santa Caterina area on the north rim of Victoria is a good candidate.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Sep 3 2008, 08:26 PM
Post #6


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



http://pancam.astro.cornell.edu/pancam_ins...162B_dstar.html - Granada I think it's called....probably only a couple of weeks good driving back around Victoria - and some diversity visible even in the approx true colour

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Sep 3 2008, 08:34 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



It would be interesting to try some trenching in, around, and through the cobble piles to see if there is evidence of impact near the surface. If the cobbles were deposited in ancient times, then probably no impact evidence remains, but if they arrived on a recent timescale we might see some deformation or compression of the subsurface soil particles.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Sep 3 2008, 08:52 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2918
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (ElkGroveDan @ Sep 3 2008, 10:34 PM) *
It would be interesting to try some trenching in, around, and through the cobble piles to see if there is evidence of impact near the surface. If the cobbles were deposited in ancient times, then probably no impact evidence remains, but if they arrived on a recent timescale we might see some deformation or compression of the subsurface soil particles.

Is there any risk doing some trenching regarding the weel issue?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Sep 11 2008, 08:00 AM
Post #9


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



This is in the imaging plan for sol 1648 (tomorrow):
01648::p2446::18::16::16::0::0::2::34::pancam_cobble_field_L257R2

First target maybe?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulM
post Sep 12 2008, 07:51 PM
Post #10


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 206
Joined: 15-August 07
From: Shrewsbury, Shropshire
Member No.: 3233



The following 3rd September Opportunity Update talked about where the rover would drive to next:

http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/sta...tml#opportunity

I do not think that this update has been discussed yet in UMSF.

This Update said:

"...The rover also acquired images of a planned study area known as "Bright Spot" because of the large amount of sunlight reflected from its surface..."

The Update also said:

"...Sol 1639:...Opportunity took images of "Bright Patch Two" with the panoramic camera..."

Is it possible that "Bright Patch 2" is part of "Bright Spot"? This seems to be the PANCAM photo of "Bright Spot 2" that is being referred to:

http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all...OYP2571L2M1.JPG

The way that I read the Update, "Bright Patch 2" and "Bright Spot" are new targets several meters away from Opportunity's current location and are not simply located on the large sand ripple on the rim of Victoria? Does the direction of Bright Spot give any indication as to whether Opportunity will be travelling North, South, East or West next?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Sep 13 2008, 07:51 AM
Post #11


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



I'll double-check later but AFAIK these features are all located at the current site.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Sep 13 2008, 10:14 AM
Post #12


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



QUOTE (PaulM @ Sep 12 2008, 08:51 PM) *
The way that I read the Update, "Bright Patch 2" and "Bright Spot" are new targets several meters away from Opportunity's current location and are not simply located on the large sand ripple on the rim of Victoria? Does the direction of Bright Spot give any indication as to whether Opportunity will be travelling North, South, East or West next?


I'm not sure, "Bright Patch 2" is as your image link shows, right in front of Oppy. Could "Bright Spot" be the "bright_dust" sequence taken on sol 1641:

http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all...4P2442R2M1.HTML

The drive yestersol (1648) was a short one in this direction, so this looks like it may be the next target. (Next drive is tomorrowsol (1650))


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BrianL
post Sep 13 2008, 02:53 PM
Post #13


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 530
Joined: 21-March 06
From: Canada
Member No.: 721



I was kind of hoping Bright Spot was the Beacon and they were going to head over and examine it. Mind you, that would be a long hike over to the far rim, but it is on the way toward Ithaca. biggrin.gif

Brian
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Sep 13 2008, 02:58 PM
Post #14


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Speaking about driving, I would expect much more moves now that the IDD "shoulder" motor is left unusable.
Think of it; if you want to sniff/look at a target to the left/right of the centerline the rover must be moved instead of just moving the arm to the target's position.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BrianL
post Sep 17 2008, 03:59 AM
Post #15


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 530
Joined: 21-March 06
From: Canada
Member No.: 721



Well, looking at today's front and rear hazcams, I think they are asking for an embedding if they continue trying to get to Bright Whatever. Front wheels seem to be digging in and rear tracks look like some churning going on. That's a scary looking drift.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th April 2024 - 08:10 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.