Ideas on a future manned Mars |
Ideas on a future manned Mars |
May 31 2006, 06:49 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Special Cookie Group: Members Posts: 2168 Joined: 6-April 05 From: Sintra | Portugal Member No.: 228 |
Are you awared of any psychological, philosophical, antropological studies on a future manned mission and possible settlement on Mars?
Basically, and this is a point I would like to be discussed and developed, I believe that the humans envolved in such quest will develop a sense of mission, evolving, as time goes by, in a kind of mystical experience, in spite of all the efforts developed to keep their minds occupied and executing their scientific work. The fact of being the first ones, the fact of being the Primus in an alien world will originate an ambiguous feeling: the nostalgia of mother Earth, proud, fear, curiosity, exploration, survival... In spite of being the executors of Humanity's most advanced technological saga, all the primitive, basic instincts will arise and, on that process, trying to understand the magnificence of their adventure, they're role on it, there are questions that will not be immediately answered and then, in order to fill in the gaps, the spirit will search, using external and internal references, one truth, that will, due to the never experienced nature of their condition, the only one. But this is only my opinion, a pilgrim's one... Any other? -------------------- "Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe |
|
|
Guest_Richard Trigaux_* |
May 31 2006, 08:31 PM
Post
#2
|
Guests |
We are still a bit far from Mars colonies... But this topic is however relevant, as one of the toughest difficulties of a manned Mars mission is that the crew will have to remain locked for months or years at several into something the size of a van... Terrible psychological challenge, not to call it a torture. Russians have some more experience about it, and this experience is not reassuring: some lengthy missions resulted into severe disputes among crew members, and even in at least one instance in a fight with injury.
But don't you know, to remain locked at several people into a narrow space for years with no distractions is a common custom on Earth... in monasteries and similar places, of several religions, people undertake years long retreats in cells and narrow spaces, seeing nobody, even not speaking to nobody. And without any other kind of distraction, no games, no TV, no work other than meditation, and of course without sex in any form... In the case I know the best, tibetan Buddhism, three years retreats (seven years at a whole) are a common practice, and when you see a lama, in most cases he did this. And there are already such retreat centers in Europe, in France, Spain, Switzerland, USA, New Zealand... not to speak of numerous christian monasteries where people use to do this for ages. And most of the time, these people pass the test, they bear living several years into such harsh conditions, where we cannot even imagine to be able to do so ourselves. Why? because they already have a spiritual preparation: mastering concentration and emotions, having a strong motivation, and a clear purpose in mind. And also an efficient psychological discipline, and methods which allow them to cope with any kind of problem which could arise. So they are able to do this where most of us will flee after 15 days. So the idea is to apply such methods to an eventual long duration space mission. Anyway I don't see any other solution. Of course, as you noticed, ustrax, there are spiritual stakes into colonizing Mars. And, in the instance where a Mars mission crew would use such spiritual methods, and a spiritual master would be part of the crew, it will have much other effects than just allowing them to bear the travel... A settlement is a tougher question to address, and would have a very different feel from a limited visit. The book "Red Mars" tried to play around with these ideas. One interesting idea was that the first settlers would be emotional contradictions - they'd be persons that must outwardly exude qualities of astronauts & brilliant engineers/scientist to be selected as Settlers, but at the same time have a personal reason that makes them willing leave everything behind. The "pilgrims" seemed to have 3 main factions: those that wanted to make mars more earthlike, those that wanted to keep mars pristine, with settlements only "fishbowls" apart from the planet, and those that simply considered it an extension of earth's resources to be exploited (i.e. not a pilgrim's perspective). Such contradictions show us how complex would be the establishment of a plan to Mars. And beyond this appear all the contradictions of manking, between those who seek for a spiritual meaning, or simply happiness, and those with much more material and short scope motives in life. So we cannot just let a restricted team make the plan. A scientist team will have science goals, a business team will have exploitation of resources in mind, other will hope to build a better society on Mars, etc. So the discution must involve much more people. |
|
|
May 31 2006, 09:59 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 311 Joined: 31-August 05 From: Florida & Texas, USA Member No.: 482 |
So we cannot just let a restricted team make the plan. A scientist team will have science goals, a business team will have exploitation of resources in mind, other will hope to build a better society on Mars, etc. So the discution must involve much more people. Excellent point. The book "Red Mars" addresses this too. Initially, the First Settlement is controlled directly from a multinational Mission Control center on earth... but Earth is very, very remote and the decision makers are not experiencing the "ground truth". I'd tend to think that even under the best circumstances that eventually the Settlement will begin taking more and more control over their own destiny as they gain more self sufficiency. They'd stop thinking of themselves as representitives of Earth, but as martians. Of course, this assumes a colony could become totally self-sufficient... a *very* difficult stretch. How, for instance, can you replace a failed computer chip without mother Earth to look after you? And how can a "low-tech" society on Mars ever survive? And perhaps the first pioneers will build their monuments towards Earth... but their children might be the first Homo Viator - developing as an infant in low gravity and sterile air, never experiencing a body of liquid water larger than a pond, never seeing an open expanse of living wilderness under a dynamic sky, but instead a desolate landscape. Would they long for Earth with some imprinted memory of the ocean, or would they dream of Mars? Would mankind's history be theirs, or does their history begin at T0 - the day the Pioneers landed? |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th April 2024 - 11:55 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |