IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

20 Pages V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
INCOMING!, Detection and observation of Earth-approaching asteroids.
dilo
post Oct 12 2008, 05:36 PM
Post #91


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2248
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Excellent work, Spin! I think too that halved distance could be easily explained by atmospheric deceleration, obviously definitive confirm would need a more accurate simulation to match data.


--------------------
- Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spin0
post Oct 16 2008, 02:34 PM
Post #92


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 22
Joined: 14-March 08
Member No.: 4066



US Gov fireball data release regarding 2008 TC3:

QUOTE
Fireball Detection

Sensors aboard US satellites detected the impact of a bolide over Africa on 7 October 2008 at 02:45:40 UT. The initial observation put the object at 65.4 km altitude at 20.9 degrees North Latitude, 31.4 degrees East Longitude. The object detonated at an altitude of approximately 37 km at 20.8 degrees North Latitude, 32.2 degrees East Longitude. The total radiated energy was approximately 4.0X10^11 joules. This is equivalent to approximately 0.1 KT of radiated energy (assumes a 6000 Kelvin black body).

http://aquarid.physics.uwo.ca/~pbrown/usaf.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Oct 16 2008, 02:56 PM
Post #93


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3534
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (Spin0 @ Oct 16 2008, 04:34 PM) *
US Gov fireball data release regarding 2008 TC3

Interestingly, the radiative energy of 0.1 kT is an order of magnitude lower than the infrasound estimate of the blast wave (between 1.1 and 2.1 kT). I find that a bit surprising, for example nuclear detonations (a bad analogue, but similar high energy density in a low volume after the initial high energy fireball expands a bit) produce roughly a 60:40 thermal:blast energy distribution, shifting even more in favor of thermal effect at higher altitudes.

What's more, the detonation altitude of 37 kilometers is seriously high which puzzles me even more - how can a small fast moving object couple most of its energy to a very rarified atmosphere? I'd expect vaporization of the body, plasma around it and radiative cooling as primary energy deposition mechanism.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mongo
post Oct 16 2008, 05:14 PM
Post #94


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 513
Joined: 13-June 04
Member No.: 82



I guess that this shows that we still have a lot to learn about upper-atmosphere meteoric explosions -- were any hard data on radiative vs blast energy collected from previous similarly-sized events?

I would guess that military observation sats have recorded similar explosions in the past, but their detailed results would presumably not have been made publicly available.

I would love to see a plot of total energy vs blast/radiation ratio vs detonation altitude for as many events as the information has been obtained for.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Oct 16 2008, 05:22 PM
Post #95


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3534
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (Mongo @ Oct 16 2008, 07:14 PM) *
I would guess that military observation sats have recorded similar explosions in the past, but their detailed results would presumably not have been made publicly available.


http://aquarid.physics.uwo.ca/~pbrown/usaf.html


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Oct 16 2008, 09:58 PM
Post #96


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 6474
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Neat link, Gordan; thanks!

Re the detonation stats: I suspect what we're seeing is a lot more compositional variation in these objects than is generally assumed. Recovered meteorites are overwhelmingly fairly robust rocks (iron/nickel, stony); falls like that extremely volatile-rich one up in Canada a few years ago are exceedingly rare since the material is so fragile; has to be a true big 'un to survive the trip.

So, this might be affecting our assumptions about the entire meteoritic/asteroidal population in general. Sure wish that some of these staring sats were obtaining detailed broad-band spectra of the events, esp. the residual trails. (Hey, there's a mission proposal in there for somebody! Maybe ride-along sensors on GOES or other geosynchronous satellites?)


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_jumpjack_*
post Oct 17 2008, 07:25 AM
Post #97





Guests






QUOTE (ugordan @ Oct 16 2008, 07:22 PM) *

So we have a military high-atmosphere monitoring system? huh.gif Relic from ancient "Star Wars project"?

Do those acronyms in that page mean that there are so MANY USAF satellites up there? Or do they refer to observation times?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Oct 17 2008, 07:37 AM
Post #98


Administrator
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 13229
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (jumpjack @ Oct 17 2008, 08:25 AM) *
So we have a military high-atmosphere monitoring system?


Loads. It doesn't take much imagination to figure out what they're actually for.


Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Oct 17 2008, 08:59 AM
Post #99


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2816
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Spying for Major League Baseball? (sorry, old Simpsons joke)

Seriously, the military routinely monitors meteoric airbursts as part of their campaign to monitor nuclear weapons testing and as an early warning system. I seem to recall hearing that there are usually a few events per year that are big enough to set off alerts at NORAD (but that could just be an urban legend).


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Oct 17 2008, 09:16 AM
Post #100


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3534
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (volcanopele @ Oct 17 2008, 10:59 AM) *
I seem to recall hearing that there are usually a few events per year that are big enough to set off alerts at NORAD (but that could just be an urban legend).

I don't think those are rumors. There's a relatively recent story of a large asteroid detonating over the Mediterranean right at the time India and Pakistan were engaged in a military standoff. The asteroid released a yield of 26 kilotons which, had it detonated above India or Pakistan, could have caused some hairy consequences.

More at wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Mediterranean_Event


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_jumpjack_*
post Oct 17 2008, 09:16 AM
Post #101





Guests






full inline quote removed. Admins are VERY scary. - Admin

Scary. blink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Oct 17 2008, 09:18 AM
Post #102


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3534
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (jumpjack @ Oct 17 2008, 11:16 AM) *
Scary. blink.gif

Welcome to the real world...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Oct 18 2008, 01:04 PM
Post #103


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1100
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Seattle
Member No.: 530



QUOTE (volcanopele @ Oct 17 2008, 04:59 AM) *
Seriously, the military routinely monitors meteoric airbursts as part of their campaign to monitor nuclear weapons testing and as an early warning system.

Launch-detect, too. They're monitoring ballistic missile and orbital rocket launches.

The first gamma-ray detectors in orbit were, of course, looking down.

For nuclear weapons test monitoring, I believe the USAF has planes setup for atmospheric sampling, or did. It would be neat if these happened to be near enough to sniff around after a bolide. And of course, the satellites have also led to a regime of pre-announcing missile tests, so there are the sister aircraft that are configured to watch things fall into the atmosphere. The planes are 40-some-years old! (And will likely be flying when they're 60...)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tty
post Oct 18 2008, 05:52 PM
Post #104


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 683
Joined: 20-April 05
From: Sweden
Member No.: 273



It's the same in Sweden. We use 45 year old J 32B Lansen aircraft for the air sampling mission. In addition they are also part of the Air Force Historical Flight......
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Oct 18 2008, 06:23 PM
Post #105


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 6474
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



QUOTE (ugordan @ Oct 17 2008, 02:18 AM) *
Welcome to the real world...


I do seem to remember seeing a report on the Montana local news a few days after the 1972 Daylight Fireball happened that NORAD was rapidly ramping up to a full alert, since it at first glance looked like a possible sub-launched missile heading in the general direction of Malmstrom AFB...scary indeed.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

20 Pages V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 03:48 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.