Mars Rover Spirit Unearths Surprise Evidence of Wetter Past |
Mars Rover Spirit Unearths Surprise Evidence of Wetter Past |
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
May 21 2007, 08:19 PM
Post
#1
|
Guests |
|
|
|
May 22 2007, 12:40 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 524 Joined: 24-November 04 From: Heraklion, GR. Member No.: 112 |
We've found the hiding place of Paso Robles
This might be bigger than it seems. I wonder what the implications will be for the interpretation of orbiter TES data now that there is ground-truth for amorphous silica. Would the exploration of Columbia Hills have taken a different course if this discovery was made earlier ? |
|
|
May 22 2007, 05:24 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 646 Joined: 23-December 05 From: Forest of Dean Member No.: 617 |
This might be bigger than it seems. I wonder what the implications will be for the interpretation of orbiter TES data now that there is ground-truth for amorphous silica. Would the exploration of Columbia Hills have taken a different course if this discovery was made earlier ? Oh yes... they'd have dragged a wheel all the way from the top of Husband Hill to Home Plate The silica finding's yet another convincing demonstration (as if all the other multi-coloured salt deposits weren't enough) of the usefulness of doing 'scuff' operations (as opposed to brushing/RAT) to see what's below the surface - *and* another example of the serendipity that only rovers can really deliver, IMHO. ("What do we want? Dozens more MERs! When do we want them? When budgetary constraints, DSN bandwidth and management resources permit!" )_chug!_( ) -------------------- --
Viva software libre! |
|
|
May 22 2007, 08:07 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 160 Joined: 4-July 05 From: Huntington Beach, CA, USA Member No.: 429 |
What do we want? Dozens more MERs! Actually, it's surprising that there is so little overlap between the rovers' discoveries. Other than olivine found by both rovers early into the mission, all other unusual materials or features were found by only one robot. Silica and salt are only in Gusev, blueberries are only in Meridiani. Volcanic bombs are in Gusev, festoons are in Meridiani. Layered bedrock is radically different, and even sand doesn't seem to be the same. This means that more MERs are likely to discover more unique features if they are sent to new places on Mars. And even if they find something similar to Gusev or Meridiani, that would be exciting too. MSL and Phoenix may be better equipped, but it's clear that it's not enough to cover unique places on Mars. MERs are proven, there are specialists with years of MER experience, and there is Mars-tested MER software. I understand that NASA is supposed to innovate non-stop, but for the sake of science, sending more MERs would be the right thing to do IMHO. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 30th April 2024 - 08:49 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |