IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Png Versus Jpeg Image Quality, When generated from a JPEG orginal
Tman
post May 14 2005, 06:33 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 877
Joined: 7-March 05
From: Switzerland
Member No.: 186



QUOTE (NIX @ May 14 2005, 12:01 AM)
Here's an L257 view of Jibsheet. AwalkonMars Still working on the MI mosaic though... blink.gif
Nirgal, the difference in resolution is indeed an issue but overlapping the images can be a real pain..
Nico
*

Hi Nico, I just enjoyed your full resolution PNG of east Methuselah (or Jibsheet cool.gif ). Exquisite such full resolution!
In respect of the size of 25MB I wonder about you generated a PNG-file of it. The orginal pics were sure JPEG - they must be JPEG smile.gif Are you sure there would be a visible difference in comparison to a high JPEG version?

Note: For the responses in this issue it was opened a new thread in "Imagery & Tech Issues": http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.php?showtopic=1001

This post has been edited by Tman: May 16 2005, 07:55 PM


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Nix
post May 14 2005, 11:33 PM
Post #2


Chief Assistant
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1409
Joined: 5-January 05
From: Ierapetra, Greece
Member No.: 136



I think .png is better. Have not tested that extensively though. Anyone? Originals of course .jpg. I'm just used to convert fullres and 50% to .png and thumbnails to .jpg
There's some awesome stereo's in that pan too btw biggrin.gif
Nico


--------------------
photographer, space imagery enthusiast, proud father and partner, and geek.


http://500px.com/sacred-photons &
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nix
post May 15 2005, 09:13 AM
Post #3


Chief Assistant
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1409
Joined: 5-January 05
From: Ierapetra, Greece
Member No.: 136



.png and .jpg have their particular advantages but the main thing driving me right now to use .png is that saving and re-saving an image will not degrade quality, unlike to even highest quality .jpeg.
I might add some .jpg versions in the future for 100%'s like I do occasionally for 25% images but I'll also keep the .png's.
Nico smile.gif


--------------------
photographer, space imagery enthusiast, proud father and partner, and geek.


http://500px.com/sacred-photons &
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tman
post May 15 2005, 05:30 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 877
Joined: 7-March 05
From: Switzerland
Member No.: 186



QUOTE (NIX @ May 15 2005, 11:13 AM)
.png and .jpg have their particular advantages but the main thing driving me right now to use .png is that saving and re-saving an image will not degrade quality, unlike to even highest quality .jpeg.
I might add some .jpg versions in the future for 100%'s like I do occasionally for 25% images but  I'll also keep the .png's.
Nico smile.gif
*

Agree, that's a good plan biggrin.gif

BTW, my connection is fast enough, but I've thought it needn't be, also for your upload consumption.

Regarding PNG or JPEG generated from JPEG orginal pics, I remember as I was looking for Bonneville its visibility at West Spur (around sol 220), I tried for best visibility with PNGs from JPEG orginal pics by ~4 times magnified and higher. But I only could determine the PNGs save somewhat more color gradients without any better sharpness.
Therefore I think only differences in color gradient could catch someone's eye. But these images of Mars get rather little color gradients and little differences of color. If there would be a flower meadow, then probably would it be visible. tongue.gif

This post has been edited by Tman: May 15 2005, 05:46 PM


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post May 15 2005, 06:30 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



Ummm... correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't this PNG vs. JPG discussion belong in the Imagery Issues forum? I glance through that forum, but as someone who's more interested in the geology and meteorology on Mars than in the technical details of how to play with the pictures, I guess I'd like to be able to glance through the imagery issue discussions separately....

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 02:48 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.