IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Saturn Rainbow
dilo
post May 24 2005, 06:02 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Between the few visible raw images recently released, lot of interesting rings images... in particular, very unusual pictures like this:
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...eiImageID=40631
I'm not sure, but I suspect that glare is produced by the backscattered sunlight; in fact, based also on time it was taken and using Solar System simulator, they were made with "zero angle phase" front illumination...
I tried to make a false color (IR+R+G filters) composition; even if images alignment probably isn't perfect, result is amazing ohmy.gif :


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 6)
Bjorn Jonsson
post May 24 2005, 09:50 AM
Post #2


IMG to PNG GOD
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2257
Joined: 19-February 04
From: Near fire and ice
Member No.: 38



Yes, seems to be the opposition highlight. At first I wondered if this might be the unlit side of the rings and whether a bright object (a satellite) might be behind the rings but the viewing geometry makes this impossible and from other images this seems to be the lit side of the rings. Unfortunately there do not seem to be any wide angle images for proper context but a lot more narrow angle images will hopefully soon appear at the JPL site.

BTW the shape and overall appearance of the opposition highlight (assuming this really is the opposition highlight) agrees fairly well with computer simulations I did two years ago smile.gif :

http://www.mmedia.is/bjj/3dtest/saturn/index.html (scroll towards the bottom of the page)

See also http://www.mmedia.is/~bjj/planet_rend/sat_cass_ohl.jpg

In particular, it seems to be roughly circular, something I wasn't sure of. However, it may be more 'compact' than I expected and brighter where the rings are faint (dark) - it is possible that this is due to an automatic contrast stretch though.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post May 24 2005, 09:19 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Bjorn, your simulations are amazing and very realistic too!
Anyway, now all images are on line and this is a true color combination of another portion (now corrected for hirizontal shift):

I suspect subject is the C ring... wath do you think?


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bjorn Jonsson
post May 28 2005, 07:24 PM
Post #4


IMG to PNG GOD
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2257
Joined: 19-February 04
From: Near fire and ice
Member No.: 38



Having looked at all of the opposition highlight images I'm now pretty sure the spectacular color in the color composites above isn't real. It is probably due to spacecraft motion, when Cassini moves relative to the rings the opposition highlight moves as seen from the spacecraft. Unfortunately I do not know the times the images were taken and in particular I do not know the time between exposures. However, assuming the time between exposures is similar to the time between exposures for Galileo I should soon be able to get a crude estimate of how much the highlight should move due to spacecraft motion.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post May 29 2005, 04:29 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



QUOTE (Bjorn Jonsson @ May 28 2005, 07:24 PM)
Having looked at all of the opposition highlight images I'm now pretty sure the spectacular color in the color composites above isn't real. It is probably due to spacecraft motion, when Cassini moves relative to the rings the opposition highlight moves as seen from the spacecraft. Unfortunately I do not know the times the images were taken and in particular I do not know the time between exposures. However, assuming the time between exposures is similar to the time between exposures for Galileo I should soon be able to get a crude estimate of how much the highlight should move due to spacecraft motion.
*

Yes, also I reached same conclusion: the true color of highlight is almost neutral, and is better represented in the first image posted, where I crudely superimposed the 3 picture without aligning rings features. The colored highlight in the other image is due to spacecraft motion (while colors of rings should be realistic...).
Regards.


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bjorn Jonsson
post Jun 4 2005, 01:46 AM
Post #6


IMG to PNG GOD
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2257
Joined: 19-February 04
From: Near fire and ice
Member No.: 38



I did an animation showing the viewing geometry when the opposition highlight was visible:

http://www.mmedia.is/bjj/misc/css_stuff/mi...s_highlight.avi (about 3 MB)

The animation 'tracks' the opposition highlight, i.e. the image center is 'at opposition' throughout the animation. This also reveals that the opposition highlight is more 'compact' than in my photometric model of the rings - something I'll need to fix. The field of view is 15 degrees (compared to the Cassini NAC's 0.35 degrees).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Jun 27 2005, 10:21 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Shine On You Crazy Diamond! biggrin.gif

(click for animation)


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 09:42 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.