My Assistant
Object Size For Human Eyes, in comparison with Pancam and Navcam pic |
May 24 2005, 01:08 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 877 Joined: 7-March 05 From: Switzerland Member No.: 186 |
If there already was a discussion about, then I would gladly ask: where is it? Otherwise does someone know something about the object size in the pics, getting from Pancam and Navcam, in comparison with "seen by human eyes"? For example, probably the object sizes getting from Navcam are smaller as we would see it with our own eyes at the same position, but how much approximately? And how about Pancam?
Primarily I would like to know the "real" size of sun by the sunset seen from Spirit on sol 489 (Pancam): http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...indpost&p=10917 -------------------- |
|
|
|
![]() |
May 25 2005, 07:06 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 877 Joined: 7-March 05 From: Switzerland Member No.: 186 |
Thank you for your explanations - again something learned for educational background.
Due to my primary concern (Doug (the other) has it discussed): By the stiching software PTGui is both to set in "Lens Settings" -> "horizon field of view" and "focal lenght". Exactly, when I set one of the two, then there is automatically the other setting provided from the software itself. Now for a Pancam panorama I only always apply the "horizon field of view" with 16,6 degrees and the software provide 123.386 mm "focal lenght" (for a Navcam pan 45 degrees and get 43.4558 mm). Has someone the knowledge what that means in "plus" and/or "minus" magnification when we look at the Pancam and Navcam raw pictures from Mars - as per description "for human eyes at the same position like the camera". Or, How about the real focal lenghts for both cameras, Pancam and Navcam by the MERs? -------------------- |
|
|
|
May 25 2005, 08:18 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2492 Joined: 15-January 05 From: center Italy Member No.: 150 |
QUOTE (Tman @ May 25 2005, 07:06 PM) ... Now for a Pancam panorama I only always apply the "horizon field of view" with 16,6 degrees and the software provide 123.386 mm "focal lenght" (for a Navcam pan 45 degrees and get 43.4558 mm). Has someone the knowledge what that means in "plus" and/or "minus" magnification when we look at the Pancam and Navcam raw pictures from Mars - as per description "for human eyes at the same position like the camera". Or, How about the real focal lenghts for both cameras, Pancam and Navcam by the MERs? Hi Tman, I do not fully understand your first question, but on the last one you can find lot of informations; try: http://athena.cornell.edu/the_mission/ins_pancam.html About focal lenght, real value is 14.67mm on NavCam and 5.58mm with PanCam; these numbers are almost 9 times smaller than those mentioned by Doug because sensor size (the CCD) is smaller than classic picture film; this is exactly the same issue you encounter when reading specification of a digital camera lens, where "equivalent" focal lenght is larger than real focal lenght written on the lens! I hope is more clear now... -------------------- I always think before posting! - Marco -
|
|
|
|
May 26 2005, 04:42 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 877 Joined: 7-March 05 From: Switzerland Member No.: 186 |
QUOTE (dilo @ May 25 2005, 10:18 PM) About focal lenght, real value is 14.67mm on NavCam and 5.58mm with PanCam; these numbers are almost 9 times smaller than those mentioned by Doug because sensor size (the CCD) is smaller than classic picture film; this is exactly the same issue you encounter when reading specification of a digital camera lens, where "equivalent" focal lenght is larger than real focal lenght written on the lens! I hope is more clear now... Yes, thanks, it's clearer, though, are you sure about these (focal lenght) values for Navcam and Pancam? Isn't it inverted? Have you a guess about the proportion between Pancam and human eye for object sizes on Mars? What do you think about this sunset from sol 489? Would sun be smaller if we would be there at the same position and look with one's own eyes westward this sunset - how many times? -------------------- |
|
|
|
May 26 2005, 06:11 PM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2492 Joined: 15-January 05 From: center Italy Member No.: 150 |
QUOTE (Tman @ May 26 2005, 04:42 PM) Yes, thanks, it's clearer, though, are you sure about these (focal lenght) values for Navcam and Pancam? Isn't it inverted? Have you a guess about the proportion between Pancam and human eye for object sizes on Mars? What do you think about this sunset from sol 489? Would sun be smaller if we would be there at the same position and look with one's own eyes westward this sunset - how many times? Oops, you're almost right Tman... in fact, NavCanm value is correct while PanCam focal lenght is 43mm!!! (the smaller number was referred to hazcam Anyway, if you have a 15inch monitor and use a 1024x768 resolution, you should stay about 1m away in order to have the correct view of the sunset image; in fact, consider that scale is 0.28mrad/pixel for PanCam, so distance from monitor must be about 3500 times the pixel size! -------------------- I always think before posting! - Marco -
|
|
|
|
Tman Object Size For Human Eyes May 24 2005, 01:08 PM
djellison Pancam is just about the resolution of 20:20 human... May 24 2005, 01:36 PM
Tman Thanks Doug, I've found it here (below on the ... May 24 2005, 02:43 PM
djellison I think the best analogy is the eye-sight test tha... May 24 2005, 02:56 PM
Tman QUOTE (djellison @ May 24 2005, 04:56 PM)I th... May 24 2005, 04:19 PM
djellison No - 20:20 is the 'score' your eyes get. 2... May 24 2005, 07:04 PM
PaulW QUOTE (djellison @ May 24 2005, 02:04 PM)No -... May 24 2005, 08:25 PM
djellison Ahh - I thought it was more complicated that that ... May 24 2005, 09:10 PM
dvandorn QUOTE (djellison @ May 24 2005, 04:10 PM)Ahh ... May 24 2005, 11:27 PM
lyford Wikipedia to the rescue!
Though it's still... May 25 2005, 02:05 AM
ilbasso There are also a couple of advantages that the Pan... May 25 2005, 02:34 AM
odave QUOTE (ilbasso @ May 24 2005, 10:34 PM)Astron... May 25 2005, 07:22 PM
JRehling QUOTE (ilbasso @ May 24 2005, 07:34 PM)There ... May 25 2005, 08:10 PM
Deimos QUOTE (Tman @ May 26 2005, 04:42 PM)Have you ... May 26 2005, 05:13 PM
Bob Shaw Please ignore this post - it's in the wrong th... May 26 2005, 06:03 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 05:42 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|