IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Deep Space 2
Chmee
post May 27 2005, 03:17 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 154
Joined: 17-March 05
Member No.: 206



Are there any working theories why the 2 impactor probes (Deep Space 2) that piggybacked on the Mars Polar Lander did not work? Their failure should have nothing to do with the problem with the MPL lander since they were released far above the surface.

I beleive they were designed to withstand 100 gravities of deceleration and still function. Anyone?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Guest_BruceMoomaw_*
post Aug 12 2005, 04:45 AM
Post #2





Guests






The trouble is simply that -- as the failure report makes clear -- the things were so inadequately tested that there were three or four possible ways they might have failed WITHOUT even taking into account the possibility that they ran into some kind of freakishly hard, soft or sloping surface that would have wrecked them even if they hd been properly built.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Oct 3 2005, 09:20 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



I found an interesting image of the two Mars 96 Small Station landers in the .pdf of the NASA 1996 Mars Missions Press Kit. Interestingly, the document mentions that they would use airbag technology (just two big ones) and says (p52) that the same methods were used for the early Soviet Lunar landings in the 1960s! And on p54 there's mention of the twin penetrator probes returning data for a full year after landing...

...these may be just sloppy reporting on the part of NASA, however - unless there were RTGs involved somewhere along the line.

Bob Shaw
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
helvick
post Oct 3 2005, 10:05 PM
Post #4


Dublin Correspondent
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1799
Joined: 28-March 05
From: Celbridge, Ireland
Member No.: 220



QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Oct 3 2005, 10:20 PM)
...these may be just sloppy reporting on the part of NASA, however - unless there were RTGs involved somewhere along the line.

Bob Shaw
*


Yep two small RTG's per landers - 86kg total mass, 12kg landed. Much more detail on this Mars 96 page
The small landers had 7kg of instruments:
Temperature, Pressure, Humidity, Optical Depth, Ion Anemometer, Alpha, Photon and X-Ray spectrometers, Magnetometer, vertical seismometer,, Panoramic Camera, Oxidation, experiment Descent Stage temperatur, pressure and accelerometers, Descent imager.

The two 45kg penetrators - powered by a single 0.4W RTG each had 4.5kg of instruments.
Camera, Temperature, pressure, Wind speed, humidity, Gamma Spectrometer, X-Ray spectrometer, Alpha Spectrometer, Neutron Spectrometer, Grunt Accelerometer, sub-surface thermoprobe, Seismometer, Magnetometer.

1 year planned surface lifetime for all four "landers".

Pretty compact - shame they ended up in the Indian Ocean.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Oct 4 2005, 11:53 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



Quite a lot of other detail at http://www.iki.rssi.ru/eng/index.htm - follow the links for interesting Venera etc images.

Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Oct 4 2005, 01:23 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



The IKI site is interesting - I hadn't realised that the Mars 96 landers were to be released before orbital insertion, but that the Penetrators would be released afterwards. The Russian Penetrators look considerably more thought-out than the American ones, gas-lighting or not!

Mars 96 images from http://www.iki.rssi.ru/mars96/08_mars_e.htm.

Bob Shaw
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image

Attached Image

Attached Image
Attached Image
 


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Chmee   Deep Space 2   May 27 2005, 03:17 PM
- - djellison   Main theory I heard was that the terrain they ende...   May 27 2005, 03:49 PM
|- - dvandorn   QUOTE (djellison @ May 27 2005, 10:49 AM)Main...   May 27 2005, 06:33 PM
- - Decepticon   QUOTE When told of the plan to crash-land two prob...   May 27 2005, 07:01 PM
|- - dvandorn   QUOTE (Decepticon @ May 27 2005, 02:01 PM)QUO...   May 27 2005, 08:21 PM
- - Chmee   Do you guys think there is any merit in this type ...   May 27 2005, 07:15 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   If the ACME Spacecraft Co made spaceprobes at leas...   May 27 2005, 07:30 PM
||- - Chmee   QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ May 27 2005, 03:30 PM)...wh...   May 27 2005, 07:51 PM
||- - dvandorn   QUOTE (Chmee @ May 27 2005, 02:51 PM)QUOTE (B...   May 27 2005, 08:32 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   On a serious note, the Japanese LUNAR-B (I think) ...   May 27 2005, 07:58 PM
- - djellison   I thought they wanted to called them Divorce and E...   May 27 2005, 08:43 PM
- - edstrick   I never read or saw that a report on the DS-2 pene...   May 29 2005, 05:19 AM
|- - The Messenger   QUOTE (edstrick @ May 28 2005, 10:19 PM)I nev...   Aug 10 2005, 03:23 PM
|- - djellison   QUOTE (The Messenger @ Aug 10 2005, 03:23 PM)...   Aug 10 2005, 03:42 PM
|- - lyford   QUOTE (The Messenger @ Aug 10 2005, 07:23 AM)...   Aug 11 2005, 07:13 AM
- - Phil Stooke   "I sort of wish they had used the cartoon nam...   May 30 2005, 09:35 PM
- - djellison   I entered that DS2 comp as well - with Romulus and...   May 30 2005, 09:44 PM
|- - dvandorn   I wasn't aware of the competition at the time,...   May 31 2005, 06:38 AM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (djellison @ May 30 2005, 10:44 PM)I en...   May 31 2005, 10:58 AM
- - djellison   Well, if they did that, then MPL would have to be ...   May 31 2005, 07:25 AM
|- - dvandorn   Can *you* think of a better way to get people to w...   May 31 2005, 07:40 AM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (dvandorn @ May 31 2005, 08:40 AM)Can *...   May 31 2005, 11:03 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   For God's sake, if there was any such force it...   Aug 11 2005, 01:40 PM
|- - The Messenger   you have been advised once - and that's the on...   Aug 11 2005, 07:20 PM
- - djellison   I was THIS close ( finger and thumb just about tou...   Aug 11 2005, 01:59 PM
- - Chmee   Well, we all know that the Deep Space 2 probes wer...   Aug 11 2005, 06:21 PM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (Chmee @ Aug 11 2005, 11:21 AM)Well, we...   Aug 11 2005, 06:59 PM
|- - The Messenger   QUOTE (JRehling @ Aug 11 2005, 11:59 AM)My ow...   Aug 11 2005, 07:27 PM
- - Gsnorgathon   What do you suppose is the likelihood of the oppos...   Aug 12 2005, 02:04 AM
|- - The Messenger   QUOTE (Gsnorgathon @ Aug 11 2005, 07:04 PM)Wh...   Aug 17 2005, 04:45 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   The trouble is simply that -- as the failure repor...   Aug 12 2005, 04:45 AM
|- - gallen_53   The DS-2 concept of using a 45 deg. sphere-cone fr...   Aug 22 2005, 04:18 AM
|- - Bob Shaw   I found an interesting image of the two Mars 96 Sm...   Oct 3 2005, 09:20 PM
|- - helvick   QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Oct 3 2005, 10:20 PM)...the...   Oct 3 2005, 10:05 PM
||- - Bob Shaw   Quite a lot of other detail at http://www.iki.rssi...   Oct 4 2005, 11:53 AM
||- - Bob Shaw   The IKI site is interesting - I hadn't realise...   Oct 4 2005, 01:23 PM
|- - tedstryk   QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Oct 3 2005, 09:20 PM)I foun...   Oct 3 2005, 10:29 PM
|- - helvick   QUOTE (tedstryk @ Oct 3 2005, 11:29 PM)There ...   Oct 3 2005, 11:17 PM
||- - tty   QUOTE (helvick @ Oct 4 2005, 01:17 AM)If you ...   Oct 5 2005, 06:48 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (tedstryk @ Oct 3 2005, 11:29 PM)There ...   Oct 5 2005, 08:21 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   Actually, it was overboard of me to bring up ...   Aug 17 2005, 10:15 PM
- - djellison   And anyway - the phrase is Hoaglanderati Doug   Aug 17 2005, 10:26 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (djellison @ Aug 17 2005, 11:26 PM)And ...   Aug 18 2005, 03:53 PM
- - edstrick   The Messenger: "Interesting thought. Studies ...   Aug 18 2005, 10:45 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   There have indeed been quite a lot of abstracts on...   Aug 22 2005, 08:33 AM
|- - gallen_53   Bruce Moomaw said QUOTE But keep in mind that bac...   Aug 23 2005, 06:17 AM
- - edstrick   I never saw a "final investigation report...   Aug 22 2005, 08:46 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   I HAVE seen the final DS-2 report, and they though...   Aug 22 2005, 01:00 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   I didn't say it was a DS-2 sized penetrator --...   Aug 23 2005, 08:35 AM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Aug 23 2005, 09:35 AM)I ...   Aug 23 2005, 11:55 AM
|- - The Messenger   http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/marsreports/mpl_report_1.p...   Aug 23 2005, 06:10 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   I see "Messenger" has beaten me to the p...   Aug 23 2005, 10:47 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   Well, Mars 96 wouldn't have worked even if it ...   Oct 4 2005, 03:16 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   Actually, the Russian penetrators bear a very stro...   Oct 5 2005, 11:01 AM
|- - tedstryk   I think a great mission would be to put two of tho...   Oct 5 2005, 01:14 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Oct 5 2005, 12:01 PM)Act...   Oct 5 2005, 08:18 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   "Have you ever seen any specs for the somewha...   Oct 5 2005, 11:04 PM
- - PhilHorzempa   Perhaps soemone else recalls follow-up work done r...   Jun 20 2006, 05:01 AM
|- - PhilHorzempa   QUOTE (PhilHorzempa @ Jun 20 2006, 01:01 ...   Jul 1 2006, 03:47 AM
- - dvandorn   Also (since you revived this thread, Phil), does a...   Jun 20 2006, 05:35 AM
- - djellison   Obviously as part of the MPL MOC search, DS2 impac...   Jun 20 2006, 07:12 AM
|- - mchan   What would a DS2 impact site be expected to look l...   Jun 20 2006, 07:54 AM
- - djellison   Give that Beagle 2 was expected to create a crater...   Jun 20 2006, 08:03 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 08:20 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.