My Assistant
Deep Space 2 |
May 27 2005, 03:17 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 17-March 05 Member No.: 206 |
Are there any working theories why the 2 impactor probes (Deep Space 2) that piggybacked on the Mars Polar Lander did not work? Their failure should have nothing to do with the problem with the MPL lander since they were released far above the surface.
I beleive they were designed to withstand 100 gravities of deceleration and still function. Anyone? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Guest_BruceMoomaw_* |
Aug 12 2005, 04:45 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Guests |
The trouble is simply that -- as the failure report makes clear -- the things were so inadequately tested that there were three or four possible ways they might have failed WITHOUT even taking into account the possibility that they ran into some kind of freakishly hard, soft or sloping surface that would have wrecked them even if they hd been properly built.
|
|
|
|
Oct 3 2005, 09:20 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2488 Joined: 17-April 05 From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK Member No.: 239 |
I found an interesting image of the two Mars 96 Small Station landers in the .pdf of the NASA 1996 Mars Missions Press Kit. Interestingly, the document mentions that they would use airbag technology (just two big ones) and says (p52) that the same methods were used for the early Soviet Lunar landings in the 1960s! And on p54 there's mention of the twin penetrator probes returning data for a full year after landing...
...these may be just sloppy reporting on the part of NASA, however - unless there were RTGs involved somewhere along the line. Bob Shaw -------------------- Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
|
|
|
|
Oct 3 2005, 10:05 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Dublin Correspondent ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 1799 Joined: 28-March 05 From: Celbridge, Ireland Member No.: 220 |
QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Oct 3 2005, 10:20 PM) ...these may be just sloppy reporting on the part of NASA, however - unless there were RTGs involved somewhere along the line. Bob Shaw Yep two small RTG's per landers - 86kg total mass, 12kg landed. Much more detail on this Mars 96 page The small landers had 7kg of instruments: Temperature, Pressure, Humidity, Optical Depth, Ion Anemometer, Alpha, Photon and X-Ray spectrometers, Magnetometer, vertical seismometer,, Panoramic Camera, Oxidation, experiment Descent Stage temperatur, pressure and accelerometers, Descent imager. The two 45kg penetrators - powered by a single 0.4W RTG each had 4.5kg of instruments. Camera, Temperature, pressure, Wind speed, humidity, Gamma Spectrometer, X-Ray spectrometer, Alpha Spectrometer, Neutron Spectrometer, Grunt Accelerometer, sub-surface thermoprobe, Seismometer, Magnetometer. 1 year planned surface lifetime for all four "landers". Pretty compact - shame they ended up in the Indian Ocean. |
|
|
|
Oct 4 2005, 11:53 AM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2488 Joined: 17-April 05 From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK Member No.: 239 |
Quite a lot of other detail at http://www.iki.rssi.ru/eng/index.htm - follow the links for interesting Venera etc images.
Bob Shaw -------------------- Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
|
|
|
|
Oct 4 2005, 01:23 PM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2488 Joined: 17-April 05 From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK Member No.: 239 |
The IKI site is interesting - I hadn't realised that the Mars 96 landers were to be released before orbital insertion, but that the Penetrators would be released afterwards. The Russian Penetrators look considerably more thought-out than the American ones, gas-lighting or not!
Mars 96 images from http://www.iki.rssi.ru/mars96/08_mars_e.htm. Bob Shaw -------------------- Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
|
|
|
|
Chmee Deep Space 2 May 27 2005, 03:17 PM
djellison Main theory I heard was that the terrain they ende... May 27 2005, 03:49 PM
dvandorn QUOTE (djellison @ May 27 2005, 10:49 AM)Main... May 27 2005, 06:33 PM
Decepticon QUOTE When told of the plan to crash-land two prob... May 27 2005, 07:01 PM
dvandorn QUOTE (Decepticon @ May 27 2005, 02:01 PM)QUO... May 27 2005, 08:21 PM
Chmee Do you guys think there is any merit in this type ... May 27 2005, 07:15 PM
Bob Shaw If the ACME Spacecraft Co made spaceprobes at leas... May 27 2005, 07:30 PM

Chmee QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ May 27 2005, 03:30 PM)...wh... May 27 2005, 07:51 PM

dvandorn QUOTE (Chmee @ May 27 2005, 02:51 PM)QUOTE (B... May 27 2005, 08:32 PM
Bob Shaw On a serious note, the Japanese LUNAR-B (I think) ... May 27 2005, 07:58 PM
djellison I thought they wanted to called them Divorce and E... May 27 2005, 08:43 PM
edstrick I never read or saw that a report on the DS-2 pene... May 29 2005, 05:19 AM
The Messenger QUOTE (edstrick @ May 28 2005, 10:19 PM)I nev... Aug 10 2005, 03:23 PM
djellison QUOTE (The Messenger @ Aug 10 2005, 03:23 PM)... Aug 10 2005, 03:42 PM
lyford QUOTE (The Messenger @ Aug 10 2005, 07:23 AM)... Aug 11 2005, 07:13 AM
Phil Stooke "I sort of wish they had used the cartoon nam... May 30 2005, 09:35 PM
djellison I entered that DS2 comp as well - with Romulus and... May 30 2005, 09:44 PM
dvandorn I wasn't aware of the competition at the time,... May 31 2005, 06:38 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (djellison @ May 30 2005, 10:44 PM)I en... May 31 2005, 10:58 AM
djellison Well, if they did that, then MPL would have to be ... May 31 2005, 07:25 AM
dvandorn Can *you* think of a better way to get people to w... May 31 2005, 07:40 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (dvandorn @ May 31 2005, 08:40 AM)Can *... May 31 2005, 11:03 AM
BruceMoomaw For God's sake, if there was any such force it... Aug 11 2005, 01:40 PM
The Messenger you have been advised once - and that's the on... Aug 11 2005, 07:20 PM
djellison I was THIS close ( finger and thumb just about tou... Aug 11 2005, 01:59 PM
Chmee Well, we all know that the Deep Space 2 probes wer... Aug 11 2005, 06:21 PM
JRehling QUOTE (Chmee @ Aug 11 2005, 11:21 AM)Well, we... Aug 11 2005, 06:59 PM
The Messenger QUOTE (JRehling @ Aug 11 2005, 11:59 AM)My ow... Aug 11 2005, 07:27 PM
Gsnorgathon What do you suppose is the likelihood of the oppos... Aug 12 2005, 02:04 AM
The Messenger QUOTE (Gsnorgathon @ Aug 11 2005, 07:04 PM)Wh... Aug 17 2005, 04:45 PM
gallen_53 The DS-2 concept of using a 45 deg. sphere-cone fr... Aug 22 2005, 04:18 AM
tedstryk QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Oct 3 2005, 09:20 PM)I foun... Oct 3 2005, 10:29 PM
helvick QUOTE (tedstryk @ Oct 3 2005, 11:29 PM)There ... Oct 3 2005, 11:17 PM

tty QUOTE (helvick @ Oct 4 2005, 01:17 AM)If you ... Oct 5 2005, 06:48 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (tedstryk @ Oct 3 2005, 11:29 PM)There ... Oct 5 2005, 08:21 PM
BruceMoomaw Actually, it was overboard of me to bring up ... Aug 17 2005, 10:15 PM
djellison And anyway - the phrase is Hoaglanderati
Doug Aug 17 2005, 10:26 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (djellison @ Aug 17 2005, 11:26 PM)And ... Aug 18 2005, 03:53 PM
edstrick The Messenger:
"Interesting thought. Studies ... Aug 18 2005, 10:45 AM
BruceMoomaw There have indeed been quite a lot of abstracts on... Aug 22 2005, 08:33 AM
gallen_53 Bruce Moomaw said
QUOTE But keep in mind that bac... Aug 23 2005, 06:17 AM
edstrick I never saw a "final investigation report... Aug 22 2005, 08:46 AM
BruceMoomaw I HAVE seen the final DS-2 report, and they though... Aug 22 2005, 01:00 PM
BruceMoomaw I didn't say it was a DS-2 sized penetrator --... Aug 23 2005, 08:35 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Aug 23 2005, 09:35 AM)I ... Aug 23 2005, 11:55 AM
The Messenger http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/marsreports/mpl_report_1.p... Aug 23 2005, 06:10 PM
BruceMoomaw I see "Messenger" has beaten me to the p... Aug 23 2005, 10:47 PM
BruceMoomaw Well, Mars 96 wouldn't have worked even if it ... Oct 4 2005, 03:16 AM
BruceMoomaw Actually, the Russian penetrators bear a very stro... Oct 5 2005, 11:01 AM
tedstryk I think a great mission would be to put two of tho... Oct 5 2005, 01:14 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Oct 5 2005, 12:01 PM)Act... Oct 5 2005, 08:18 PM
BruceMoomaw "Have you ever seen any specs for the somewha... Oct 5 2005, 11:04 PM
PhilHorzempa Perhaps soemone else recalls follow-up work done r... Jun 20 2006, 05:01 AM
PhilHorzempa QUOTE (PhilHorzempa @ Jun 20 2006, 01:01 ... Jul 1 2006, 03:47 AM
dvandorn Also (since you revived this thread, Phil), does a... Jun 20 2006, 05:35 AM
djellison Obviously as part of the MPL MOC search, DS2 impac... Jun 20 2006, 07:12 AM
mchan What would a DS2 impact site be expected to look l... Jun 20 2006, 07:54 AM
djellison Give that Beagle 2 was expected to create a crater... Jun 20 2006, 08:03 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 08:20 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|