My Assistant
Lunar Discovery Proposals, Proposed missions to the Moon |
Jun 7 2005, 10:44 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Solar System Cartographer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10265 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
I need a list of Discovery missions from each of the competitions since the Discover Program commenced. Not including Lunar Prospector, for which I have plenty of information already. Can anybody help me out?
At a minimum I just need a list, I guess, but other information or sources would be very useful as well, as eventually I have to go there as well. Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
|
![]() |
Jul 12 2005, 11:19 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Solar System Cartographer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10265 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Doug - a few members may still be around but the best place to start is LPI in Houston where the full set of minutes of the Apollo Site Selection Board and its associated bodies (Group for Lunar Exploration Planning, Science Working Panel) are preserved. Thousands of pages! I went through them page by page, and also through a set of binders of ASSB materials assembled by Don Wilhelms and left in the Branch History Collection at USGS Flagstaff.
The material you are talking about occupies half of my atlas. It includes dozens of EVA alternatives at places like Rima Prinz, Copernicus, Marius Hills, not to mention multiple potential landing sites around Hadley. I have sampling objectives but not specific EVAs at Littrow (this is not the same site as Taurus-Littrow). I have landing points but not EVAs for Davy. One unfortunate note, the Flagstaff material lacked some of the last few sites (including details of Tsiolkovsky) because they had been borrowed by Harrison Schmitt when I was there (and are still out). I'll have to put it in a second edition. The ASSB stuff and lots more was rescued from the dumpster, literally, by Fran Waranius, then librarian at LPI (Lunar Science Institute as it was then). At the end of Apollo the wretched engineers who run JSC just stacked it all up to be thrown out. She shuttled her car back and forth between JSC and LSI with her trunk full of these unique goodies. Anyway, hang on a bit and you'll have what you need. Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
|
Jul 12 2005, 07:26 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Jul 12 2005, 06:19 AM) Fantastic! And maybe -- just maybe -- Jack Schmitt has more than just Tsiolkovsky materials. Maybe he also has the details on the Littrow traverse plans, and the Davy traverse plans, as well. I'm as sure as I can be (without ever actually having seen them) that these must have been worked up by someone, and I'm hoping against hope that they still exist somewhere... Do you have decent copies of the Apollo 13 traverse plans, by the way? I've seen very poor PDF scans of them -- the target point for 13 was about 300 to 500 meters further west than the point designed for Apollo 14, and Lovell was supposed to make a call during final approach as to whether it was better to land short (to the eventual Apollo 14 landing point, between Triplet and Doublet) and attempt a traverse east to Cone Crater, or land west (beyond Doublet) and attempt a traverse to the smaller, slightly less "fresh" Star Crater. Traverse plans were developed for both contingencies, plus another plan designed for landing west of Star Crater (which would have been about 1.5 to 2 km downrange of the Apollo 14 point). And after the abort, as they rounded the Moon, Lovell radioed back to the ground that he was "still looking for Star Crater," which makes you wonder whether Apollo 13 would have ever even *tried* to visit Cone. As for myself, I never could figure out why they didn't target for a landing point in the valley between Cone Ridge and the Triplet craters -- it was relatively flat and smooth, and would have obviated the need for a 1.5 km trek to get to the most important sampling site there. It's not like Cone Ridge was so high as to pose an impact threat to the LM as it descended, and beginning with the very next flight, the descent profile was adjusted to allow for passing over *much* taller mountains on the way to the landing point. It would have been easy to do. -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
Phil Stooke Lunar Discovery Proposals Jun 7 2005, 10:44 PM
BruceMoomaw I can dig you up the complete set from the first s... Jun 8 2005, 03:14 AM
Phil Stooke Thanks for this, Bruce.
I am compiling an atlas o... Jun 8 2005, 12:46 PM
Phil Stooke Following up on Bruce's comment, I can now con... Jun 11 2005, 09:25 PM
Bob Shaw Does anyone know *why* NASA is being secretive abo... Jun 12 2005, 12:03 AM
Phil Stooke Bob, I think a lot of what goes into a proposal - ... Jun 12 2005, 02:54 AM
BruceMoomaw I haven't forgotten, Phil -- I've just bee... Jun 12 2005, 10:59 AM
BruceMoomaw First fruits of my labor already: I've got the... Jun 12 2005, 11:40 AM
garybeau QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Jun 12 2005, 06:40 AM)(3... Jun 12 2005, 12:16 PM
Phil Stooke There was a fascinating proposal about the time of... Jun 12 2005, 01:58 PM
dvandorn QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Jun 12 2005, 08:58 AM)Th... Jun 12 2005, 04:56 PM
Bob Shaw Jim Irwin's dream about following old tracks a... Jun 12 2005, 05:17 PM

garybeau I think the MER rovers will go down in history as ... Jun 12 2005, 05:44 PM

MiniTES QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Jun 12 2005, 05:17 PM)Jim I... Jul 11 2005, 11:07 AM
MizarKey QUOTE (dvandorn @ Jun 12 2005, 08:56 AM)It al... Jun 13 2005, 04:04 PM
JRehling QUOTE (MizarKey @ Jun 13 2005, 09:04 AM)Doug,... Jun 13 2005, 08:46 PM
dvandorn QUOTE (MizarKey @ Jun 13 2005, 11:04 AM)Doug,... Jun 14 2005, 12:37 AM
Jeff7 QUOTE How do you keep your electronics and instrum... Jun 12 2005, 02:50 PM
Bob Shaw Standardised components *must* at some point save ... Jun 12 2005, 04:41 PM
Phil Stooke Bob is certainly right about standardised componen... Jun 12 2005, 05:17 PM
Phil Stooke Hi, Bob!
Other Doug, do you have any informat... Jun 12 2005, 05:19 PM
dvandorn It didn't get so far as to have a design of EV... Jun 12 2005, 05:32 PM
BruceMoomaw Phil is right -- I dug up all my material on all o... Jun 13 2005, 01:10 AM
Phil Stooke Bruce - many thanks for this. I seem to have lost... Jun 13 2005, 08:30 PM
BruceMoomaw Sure, Phil. My new E-mail address is rmoomaw@sbcg... Jun 13 2005, 10:33 PM
BruceMoomaw I finally found my super-sparse notes on that prop... Jun 14 2005, 08:21 AM
Phil Stooke Bruce very kindly provided me with quite a bit of ... Jul 11 2005, 09:15 PM
BruceMoomaw I've got quite a lot more coming for you, Phil... Jul 12 2005, 01:48 AM
Phil Stooke Thanks, Bruce! Anything relating to specific ... Jul 12 2005, 02:38 AM
dvandorn Does anyone have addresses or contact information ... Jul 12 2005, 04:50 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (dvandorn @ Jul 12 2005, 05:50 AM)In th... Jul 12 2005, 02:04 PM
Phil Stooke Bob, what you say would certainly apply to Ptolema... Jul 12 2005, 02:36 PM
Bob Shaw Phil:
OK, we're talking about a crater which ... Jul 12 2005, 07:58 PM
Bob Shaw I take back what I said about a rolling plain - Co... Jul 12 2005, 08:02 PM
JRehling QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Jul 12 2005, 12:58 PM)Phil:... Jul 13 2005, 06:40 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (JRehling @ Jul 13 2005, 07:40 PM)The f... Jul 13 2005, 08:52 PM
Phil Stooke Doug, yes, I have Apollo 13 EVA plans, which diffe... Jul 12 2005, 08:26 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Jul 12 2005, 09:26 PM)It... Jul 12 2005, 08:39 PM
Bob Shaw David Shayler's Apollo: The Lost and Forgotten... Jul 12 2005, 11:02 PM
Phil Stooke Bob, yes, Copernicus is an amazing place. The fab... Jul 12 2005, 08:29 PM
BruceMoomaw If I remember correctly, Apollo 12's backup ta... Jul 12 2005, 11:56 PM
Phil Stooke Bruce, the backup site for Apollo 12 and Apolo 13 ... Jul 13 2005, 12:06 AM
Bob Shaw Phil and Bruce;
David Harland's excellent ... Jul 13 2005, 01:41 PM
Phil Stooke Bob, the Shayler book is good, though hideously ex... Jul 13 2005, 12:10 AM
BruceMoomaw Does anyone have maps of the traverses for a landi... Jul 13 2005, 07:26 AM
Phil Stooke Yes, I have an Alphonsus traverse map, though with... Jul 13 2005, 10:57 AM
Bob Shaw I located the proposed Apollo 18 landing site on t... Jul 13 2005, 08:45 PM
Bob Shaw More Apollo 18 - 50% and 25% reductions of the las... Jul 13 2005, 08:47 PM
Bob Shaw Apollo 18, a rather closer view (actually a crop f... Jul 13 2005, 08:49 PM
Bob Shaw And the location - I think - on the Lunar Orbiter ... Jul 13 2005, 08:51 PM
Phil Stooke OK, here's the Apollo 12 backup story. I thin... Jul 13 2005, 01:55 PM
Bob Shaw Phil:
Fascinating!
Bob Shaw Jul 13 2005, 02:14 PM
BruceMoomaw QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Jul 13 2005, 10:57 AM)Ye... Jul 14 2005, 04:08 AM
dvandorn QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Jul 13 2005, 11:08 PM)St... Jul 14 2005, 04:00 PM
BruceMoomaw Once again, however, they very badly wanted to get... Jul 14 2005, 05:10 PM
Phil Stooke One other factor was not in Alphonus's favor: ... Jul 15 2005, 04:03 AM
Phil Stooke I just want to follow up on Bob's comment on A... Jul 15 2005, 04:16 AM
Bob Shaw Phil and Bruce:
You've both said that the US ... Jul 15 2005, 11:26 AM
Phil Stooke Luna 16 flew before Apollo 14. Its flight profile... Jul 15 2005, 12:35 PM
Phil Stooke I should have added, there is a map in the last AS... Jul 15 2005, 12:44 PM
BruceMoomaw "So: how did the Apollo-era planners know wha... Jul 15 2005, 09:38 PM
Phil Stooke The near-Crisium region is defined by orbital dyna... Jul 15 2005, 09:55 PM
Bob Shaw Phil:
There must be more than that to it, as the ... Jul 15 2005, 11:45 PM
Phil Stooke Well, Bob, yes, there's more to it, but that... Jul 16 2005, 12:03 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Jul 16 2005, 01:03 AM)We... Jul 16 2005, 12:11 AM
dvandorn Yes, Bob, that's exactly how the Soviets did i... Jul 17 2005, 08:27 AM
tedstryk "The Luna sample returns happened at landings... Jul 17 2005, 12:40 PM
Phil Stooke Applied Space Resources (RIP) planned a mission ca... Jul 17 2005, 03:55 PM
Phil Stooke Since we have been talking about the Luna sample r... Jul 19 2005, 02:23 PM
BruceMoomaw Huh? The retrorocket on the Block 2 Rangers would... Jul 19 2005, 06:27 PM
Phil Stooke Bruce is quite right and what I said was unintenti... Jul 19 2005, 08:44 PM
BruceMoomaw Actually, I'm relieved that I was correct -- t... Jul 19 2005, 11:43 PM
dvandorn I have the (in)famous Ranger issue of National Geo... Jul 20 2005, 12:15 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (dvandorn @ Jul 20 2005, 01:15 AM)I hav... Jul 20 2005, 12:21 AM
BruceMoomaw It had a smaller solid motor inside the big conica... Jul 20 2005, 02:24 AM
edstrick ...."on whether the drop tests had been rigor... Jul 20 2005, 08:42 AM
dvandorn The lunar regolith compacts very, very quickly int... Jul 21 2005, 05:44 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (dvandorn @ Jul 21 2005, 06:44 AM)The l... Jul 21 2005, 09:02 AM
edstrick The LM impacts were extremely oblique... 80 degree... Jul 21 2005, 10:37 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (edstrick @ Jul 21 2005, 11:37 AM)The L... Jul 21 2005, 10:44 AM
AndyG QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Jul 21 2005, 10:44 AM)*Real... Jul 21 2005, 02:09 PM
Phil Stooke The best reference for artificial impact craters o... Jul 21 2005, 01:55 PM
ljk4-1 QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Jul 21 2005, 08:55 AM)Th... Jul 21 2005, 03:42 PM
ljk4-1 QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Jul 21 2005, 10:42 AM)Th... Jul 21 2005, 04:00 PM
edstrick Phil said: LRO will allow a search for all impact ... Jul 22 2005, 10:20 AM
ljk4-1 QUOTE (edstrick @ Jul 22 2005, 05:20 AM)Phil ... Jul 22 2005, 01:25 PM
edstrick "And of course Surveyor 4 - did it land okay ... Jul 22 2005, 08:04 PM
ljk4-1 QUOTE (edstrick @ Jul 22 2005, 03:04 PM)... Jul 22 2005, 08:18 PM
Phil Stooke Meridiani? Yikes, it was off course!
Phil Jul 22 2005, 08:09 PM
edstrick "Meridiani? Yikes, it was off course!... Jul 23 2005, 08:12 AM
edstrick Assuming Surveyor 4 did not explode, could it have... Jul 23 2005, 08:21 AM
Phil Stooke Medii, edstrick! Sinus Medii... Meridiani is ... Jul 23 2005, 11:20 AM
BruceMoomaw Apparently Surveyor 4 lost contact at precisely th... Jul 23 2005, 07:55 PM
Bob Shaw Will any of the mineralogical instruments under co... Jul 23 2005, 09:58 PM
Phil Stooke Bruce, that Technology Week story would be interes... Jul 23 2005, 10:51 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Jul 23 2005, 11:51 PM)Br... Jul 23 2005, 11:31 PM
edstrick Medii, edstrick! Sinus Medii... Meridiani is q... Jul 24 2005, 05:06 AM
BruceMoomaw QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Jul 23 2005, 10:51 PM)Br... Jul 24 2005, 05:11 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 02:59 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|