IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

A Shocker About Hyperion
Guest_BruceMoomaw_*
post Jul 11 2005, 11:15 PM
Post #1





Guests






We now have the first density estimate of it from Cassini -- and it appears
that we have yet ANOTHER icy rubble pile. The estimate: 0.6 grams/cc.
Also, the surface is now officially recognized as very weird, in a way that
suggests that it is in no way a solid world:
http://ciclops.org/view.php?id=1192
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Guest_Myran_*
post Jul 12 2005, 02:40 PM
Post #2





Guests






QUOTE
Decepticon wrote: Ok here's one that might be hard to swallow.


I think Hyperion is a captured comet. 


Yes, I cant but agree with you, I find that idea hard to swallow.

I would say its ar more likely Hyperion used to be a more 'normal' icy moon, that once in the past took a tremedous blow by one impacting body. The moon shattered and after time recollected but the weak gravity couldnt compress the pieces leaving the spaces that gives it the low density.
If thats not the case it could contain frozen gases that are lighter than water, and with a dark material on the surface I do understand how you come to think of a comet, but I seriosuly dont think it is.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Jul 12 2005, 08:30 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



If we're accepting *any* captures as the origin of outer planetary moons (as opposed to a mini solar accretion disk) then surely comet/cometoid bodies are quite likely to be captured - there's lots of 'em, and they have orbits which mess with the gas giants on a regular basis (bet the Jovian Trojans are cometoids!). We saw evidence in the Jupiter system of crater chains from disrupted comets, as well as an actual disrupted comet impact, and as for the first port of call when Cassini hit Saturn's outer suburbs...

...but - and it's a b-i-g BUT: wouldn't we preferentially see these guys on the outer fringes of the systems which they've come to inhabit, not slam-bang up against the planets? The orbital mechanics surrounding a d-i-s-t-a-n-t capture are going to be much more benign than something just above the clouds (well, almost!).

Maybe there's a size thing going on, with some ancient KBO population being captured and preserved in almost the inner Solar System while their brethren were gradually pumped out - or in - and only standard-sized comets were left...


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
abalone
post Jul 12 2005, 11:18 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 362
Joined: 12-June 05
From: Kiama, Australia
Member No.: 409



QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Jul 13 2005, 07:30 AM)
If we're accepting *any* captures as the origin of outer planetary moons (as opposed to a mini solar accretion disk) then surely comet/cometoid bodies are quite likely to be captured - there's lots of 'em, and they have orbits which mess with the gas giants on a regular basis (
*

Capture favours retrograde motion and at the outer edge of the family of moons, this is not what we have here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rob Pinnegar
post Jul 14 2005, 12:10 AM
Post #5


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 509
Joined: 2-July 05
From: Calgary, Alberta
Member No.: 426



What about disintegrative capture? If, several billion years ago, an unassuming icy planetesimal on its way through the Saturn system happened to pass within Titan's Roche limit, would Titan have been able to break it up?

From what I remember of disintegrative capture, the fragments of the disrupted body end up leaving the vicinity of the primary body (here Titan) with a pretty large velocity distribution. There is also a lot of dissipation due to internal friction and gravitational interaction of the fragments during the breakup, which means that any debris trapped in Saturnian orbit wouldn't necessarily end up crossing Titan again. One would expect that at least _some_ of the debris would end up in the 4:3 resonance. (Any stuff that didn't end up in a stable resonance would probably end up beating the heck out of Titan and Saturn's other moons.)

The debris that would be "slowed down" the most during the disintegration would be the stuff on the Titan facing side. If Titan's upper atmosphere got involved this effect would of course be even more pronounced. If the planetesimal was differentiated this could in part explain the low density of the material captured by Saturn... it would be mostly ice.

I have absolutely no idea whether this hypothesis is even remotely feasible from a dynamical standpoint. (Hope I'm not getting any of the basic facts about disintegrative capture wrong. It's been about seven or eight years since I last read up on it.)

Cheers
Rob
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Jul 14 2005, 09:55 AM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



Rob:

Seems reasonable - and presumably would also work in other gas-giant systems with large moons. I'd still like it if some o-o-o-o-ld material could have survived!

I still wonder about the Jovian Trojan Asteroids...

Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 06:37 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.