My Assistant
A Shocker About Hyperion |
| Guest_BruceMoomaw_* |
Jul 11 2005, 11:15 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Guests |
We now have the first density estimate of it from Cassini -- and it appears
that we have yet ANOTHER icy rubble pile. The estimate: 0.6 grams/cc. Also, the surface is now officially recognized as very weird, in a way that suggests that it is in no way a solid world: http://ciclops.org/view.php?id=1192 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Guest_Myran_* |
Jul 12 2005, 02:40 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Guests |
QUOTE Decepticon wrote: Ok here's one that might be hard to swallow. I think Hyperion is a captured comet. Yes, I cant but agree with you, I find that idea hard to swallow. I would say its ar more likely Hyperion used to be a more 'normal' icy moon, that once in the past took a tremedous blow by one impacting body. The moon shattered and after time recollected but the weak gravity couldnt compress the pieces leaving the spaces that gives it the low density. If thats not the case it could contain frozen gases that are lighter than water, and with a dark material on the surface I do understand how you come to think of a comet, but I seriosuly dont think it is. |
|
|
|
Jul 12 2005, 08:30 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2488 Joined: 17-April 05 From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK Member No.: 239 |
If we're accepting *any* captures as the origin of outer planetary moons (as opposed to a mini solar accretion disk) then surely comet/cometoid bodies are quite likely to be captured - there's lots of 'em, and they have orbits which mess with the gas giants on a regular basis (bet the Jovian Trojans are cometoids!). We saw evidence in the Jupiter system of crater chains from disrupted comets, as well as an actual disrupted comet impact, and as for the first port of call when Cassini hit Saturn's outer suburbs...
...but - and it's a b-i-g BUT: wouldn't we preferentially see these guys on the outer fringes of the systems which they've come to inhabit, not slam-bang up against the planets? The orbital mechanics surrounding a d-i-s-t-a-n-t capture are going to be much more benign than something just above the clouds (well, almost!). Maybe there's a size thing going on, with some ancient KBO population being captured and preserved in almost the inner Solar System while their brethren were gradually pumped out - or in - and only standard-sized comets were left... -------------------- Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
|
|
|
|
Jul 12 2005, 11:18 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 362 Joined: 12-June 05 From: Kiama, Australia Member No.: 409 |
QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Jul 13 2005, 07:30 AM) If we're accepting *any* captures as the origin of outer planetary moons (as opposed to a mini solar accretion disk) then surely comet/cometoid bodies are quite likely to be captured - there's lots of 'em, and they have orbits which mess with the gas giants on a regular basis ( Capture favours retrograde motion and at the outer edge of the family of moons, this is not what we have here. |
|
|
|
Jul 14 2005, 12:10 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 509 Joined: 2-July 05 From: Calgary, Alberta Member No.: 426 |
What about disintegrative capture? If, several billion years ago, an unassuming icy planetesimal on its way through the Saturn system happened to pass within Titan's Roche limit, would Titan have been able to break it up?
From what I remember of disintegrative capture, the fragments of the disrupted body end up leaving the vicinity of the primary body (here Titan) with a pretty large velocity distribution. There is also a lot of dissipation due to internal friction and gravitational interaction of the fragments during the breakup, which means that any debris trapped in Saturnian orbit wouldn't necessarily end up crossing Titan again. One would expect that at least _some_ of the debris would end up in the 4:3 resonance. (Any stuff that didn't end up in a stable resonance would probably end up beating the heck out of Titan and Saturn's other moons.) The debris that would be "slowed down" the most during the disintegration would be the stuff on the Titan facing side. If Titan's upper atmosphere got involved this effect would of course be even more pronounced. If the planetesimal was differentiated this could in part explain the low density of the material captured by Saturn... it would be mostly ice. I have absolutely no idea whether this hypothesis is even remotely feasible from a dynamical standpoint. (Hope I'm not getting any of the basic facts about disintegrative capture wrong. It's been about seven or eight years since I last read up on it.) Cheers Rob |
|
|
|
Jul 14 2005, 09:55 AM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2488 Joined: 17-April 05 From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK Member No.: 239 |
Rob:
Seems reasonable - and presumably would also work in other gas-giant systems with large moons. I'd still like it if some o-o-o-o-ld material could have survived! I still wonder about the Jovian Trojan Asteroids... Bob Shaw -------------------- Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
|
|
|
|
BruceMoomaw A Shocker About Hyperion Jul 11 2005, 11:15 PM
alan Obviously Hoagland is calling the wrong moon an al... Jul 11 2005, 11:33 PM
Decepticon QUOTE (alan @ Jul 11 2005, 07:33 PM)Obviously... Jul 12 2005, 12:09 AM
BruceMoomaw Actually, those strange, small, relatively uniform... Jul 12 2005, 02:03 AM
BruceMoomaw At any rate, now we know: Hyperion's non-spher... Jul 12 2005, 02:07 AM
abalone QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Jul 12 2005, 01:07 PM)Ob... Jul 12 2005, 12:27 PM
Decepticon Ok here's one that might be hard to swallow.
... Jul 12 2005, 01:45 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (abalone @ Jul 13 2005, 12:18 AM)Captur... Jul 13 2005, 02:09 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 06:37 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|