IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

E2 Rhea Images
Phil Stooke
post Jul 15 2005, 04:26 PM
Post #1


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10265
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Here's one of the latest Rhea images showing the prominent ray crater.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Gsnorgathon
post Jul 15 2005, 06:50 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 260
Joined: 23-January 05
From: Seattle, WA
Member No.: 156



I shamefully confess that I haven't given the matter much thought, but I still can't get over the fact that the ray crater doesn't look fresh to me. Am I missing something?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Jul 15 2005, 08:12 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



QUOTE (Gsnorgathon @ Jul 15 2005, 07:50 PM)
I shamefully confess that I haven't given the matter much thought, but I still can't get over the fact that the ray crater doesn't look fresh to me. Am I missing something?
*


Phil:

The surface certainly looks strange.

There's a lot of craters with central peaks, and a lot of distinctly non-circular craters, too - the old 'Lunar grid' afficionados would have a field day!

The population distribution seems a little odd. It looks to me like there's an underlying rolling and eroded landscape peppered with bigger craters, as if a well-gardened moon had suffered a series of periods of catastrophic impacts.

The 'bright' impact crater isn't as bright as I'd have expected - the ejecta blanket is still very visible, but the relationship between ejecta blanket visiblity and rays seems somehow skewed as compared to our own Moon.

Perhaps 'fresh' ejecta is subject to faster UV damage, sublimation, and/or micrometeoroid damage, and that's what we're seeing - a different sort of weathering...

Of course, it could all be down to the filters on the camera!

Just my 10 cents!

Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 04:44 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.