My Assistant
Massive Asteroids Transformed The Earth's Surface |
Aug 5 2005, 10:11 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1887 Joined: 20-November 04 From: Iowa Member No.: 110 |
At least three massive asteroids smashed into the Earth more than 3.2 billion years ago, and caused such destruction, they dramatically changed the structure and composition of the Earth's surface. This is according to new research from scientists at the Australian National University. The team uncovered evidence of major earthquakes, faulting, and volcanic eruptions that were so violent they dramatically changed the way the Earth's surface was forming. This happened during a period that the Moon also suffered heavy bombardment.
“Our findings are further evidence that the seismic aftershocks of these massive impacts resulted in the abrupt termination of an over 300 million years-long evolutionary stage dominated by basaltic volcanic activity and protracted accretion of granitic plutons,” Dr Glikson said. “The precise coincidence of the faulting and igneous activity with the impact deposits, coupled with the sharp break between basaltic crust and continental formations, throws a new light on the role of asteroid impacts in terrestrial evolution,” Dr Glikson said. http://www.universetoday.com/am/publish/ea...ids.html?582005 Could one of the geologist interpret this please. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Guest_Richard Trigaux_* |
Aug 10 2005, 10:46 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Guests |
Thanks all for your precisions.
First the idea as what "something special" happened 3.2 billions years ago is the occurence of large (in the 1000kms) bassins on the Moon, which formed in a relatively short time. This simultaneousity hints at a special event, a group of large bodies with the same origin. This must not be confused with the initial bombing of all the planets at the origin of the solar system, which culminated 4.5 B years ago and decreased steadily since. If the 3.2 B years event is not local to Earth, we may expect that Mare Caloris (Mercury) Hellas (Mars) and eventually others formed simultaneously. But we do not know the dates of these events. But the fact that there is a group of large objects crashing on the Moon nearby in the same time makes that the idea of "A second Terrestrial satellite " not so "special pleading" as you say Bob Shaw. Of course other origins are possible, fo instance a large collision in the asteriod belt, and it is even more likely. (At the origin there was only some spherical asteroids, but numerous collisions occured which created the thousands angulous bodies we know today). The original theory of the "second satellite of Earth" was in fact more complicated, it was rather a belt of debris: either an unique body never formed, or it broke appart. (Remember that at that time the Moon was much closer from Earth, so there was little place for the accretion of a third body, and matter rather formed a great number of small bodies, like today with the numerous little satellites at the rim of Saturn's ring). So when these bodies may have hit the Moon, due to the loss of mass, angular momentum rearanged the axis of rotation of the Moon, untill the next shock, so Bob Shaw, I think it would be rather difficult to infer orbital data of the impactors from the distribution of today marks. Thank you tty for your precisions. The date you give (3.8 billion years) is what I was speaking about, but I did not remembered the figure. Perhaps this date is the date when the first continents began to form. Life seems much older, but this is known only from the evolution of DNA which has its own "clock" and we are not sure that this clock moves at a constant rate. There was a discution about the effect of shockwaves on the opposite side of Mare Caloris, but these effects were purely tectonic, without melting of rock (But mountains were jumping and turned upside down like a pancake in its pan, if was rather better not to be here). At last very large impact bassins like those we are discussing about (about 1000kms) could have formed in Earth past, but if they were into oceans, all the traces disappeared in 100 or 200 millions years, with the plate tectonics on the ocean floor. And 3.2 billions years ago, there was no large continents like today. So such impacts can be identified only by their ejecta (which may have covered the whole Earth). Are these ejecta basaltic/mantellic, or continental? A last element is the evolution of life itself. It is now generally accepted that recent (less than Cambian time) impacts modeled the evolution of superior living beings. But 3.2 or 3.8 billons years ago, the skate of the evolution was rather setting the DNA code structure tself. Specialists have an hypothesis as what the genetic code is the result of an evolution in very ancient times. For instance there is a theory as what our three codons code evolved from a two codons code. So very ancien, but very large impacts may have driven the evolution of our DNA well before the appearance of our most ancient bacteria Oooof record of the longest post to date!!! |
|
|
|
alan Massive Asteroids Transformed The Earth's Surface Aug 5 2005, 10:11 PM
blobrana QUOTE (alan @ Aug 6 2005, 02:41 AM)Could one ... Aug 8 2005, 01:08 PM
Chmee You can imagine what Ceres and Vesta sized asteroi... Aug 8 2005, 02:47 PM
Richard Trigaux Fascinating prospect!
Why not? With more and ... Aug 8 2005, 04:23 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Aug 8 2005, 05:23 PM... Aug 8 2005, 04:55 PM
tty These three impact layers have been known for quit... Aug 8 2005, 06:37 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (tty @ Aug 8 2005, 07:37 PM)These three... Aug 8 2005, 08:40 PM
tty QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Aug 8 2005, 10:40 PM)Well, ... Aug 9 2005, 06:26 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (tty @ Aug 9 2005, 07:26 PM)That's ... Aug 9 2005, 09:35 PM
dvandorn I don't know, Richard -- I agree with Bob, I t... Aug 10 2005, 02:42 PM
tty QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Aug 10 2005, 12:46 P... Aug 10 2005, 06:04 PM
blobrana Hum,
There is also the complication of `coinci... Aug 11 2005, 04:12 AM
Bob Shaw Now here's a coincidence worthy of Arthur Koes... Aug 12 2005, 12:44 PM
Richard Trigaux I do not believe too much in massive volcanic epis... Aug 13 2005, 09:42 AM
Bob Shaw Richard:
I think the Chixculub/Deccan Traps link ... Aug 13 2005, 12:42 PM
elakdawalla QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Aug 13 2005, 05:42 AM)I thi... Aug 13 2005, 04:45 PM
Richard Trigaux QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Aug 13 2005, 04:45 PM)Bu... Aug 14 2005, 09:28 AM
Richard Trigaux I do not see any reason so that secondary impact m... Aug 13 2005, 04:20 PM
tty QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Aug 13 2005, 06:20 P... Aug 13 2005, 05:17 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (tty @ Aug 13 2005, 06:17 PM)Actually t... Aug 13 2005, 08:38 PM
dvandorn The Moon rotated a heck of a lot faster 3.8 billio... Aug 13 2005, 08:47 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (dvandorn @ Aug 13 2005, 09:47 PM)The M... Aug 13 2005, 08:58 PM
dvandorn Tycho was created something like 109 million years... Aug 13 2005, 09:20 PM
Richard Trigaux Thanks elakdawalla for your detailed discution on ... Aug 14 2005, 08:47 AM
tty QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Aug 14 2005, 10:47 A... Aug 14 2005, 05:44 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (tty @ Aug 14 2005, 06:44 PM)It is true... Aug 14 2005, 06:23 PM
Richard Trigaux QUOTE (tty @ Aug 14 2005, 05:44 PM)It is true... Aug 14 2005, 06:48 PM
Richard Trigaux Hi all,
about the three fallout layers in the 3... Aug 14 2005, 08:59 AM
tty I've been reading up on earlier studies of the... Aug 14 2005, 05:11 PM
Richard Trigaux QUOTE (tty @ Aug 14 2005, 05:11 PM)I've b... Aug 14 2005, 07:12 PM
tty QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Aug 14 2005, 09:12 P... Aug 14 2005, 11:03 PM
deglr6328 QUOTE (tty @ Aug 14 2005, 05:44 PM)It is true... Aug 14 2005, 06:52 PM
Richard Trigaux Thanks tty for the dates.
What would be interesti... Aug 15 2005, 09:22 AM
tty QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Aug 15 2005, 11:22 A... Aug 15 2005, 07:11 PM
Richard Trigaux Yes, Emily's article was very interesting, and... Aug 16 2005, 06:23 AM
dvandorn QUOTE (tty @ Aug 15 2005, 02:11 PM)They ((lun... Aug 16 2005, 06:47 AM
elakdawalla OK, I finally dug up that paper I wrote for profes... Aug 15 2005, 05:46 PM
Richard Trigaux QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Aug 15 2005, 05:46 PM)OK... Aug 15 2005, 07:10 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Aug 15 2005, 06:46 PM)..... Aug 15 2005, 07:29 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Aug 15 2005, 06:46 PM)OK... Aug 15 2005, 07:38 PM
tty Interesting new data on the Late Heavy Bombardment... Sep 19 2005, 10:16 AM
edstrick Elakdawalla: "paper I wrote for professor Pe... Sep 19 2005, 10:38 AM
ljk4-1 COSMIC COMPONENT DISCOVERED IN BEDOUT BRECCIA
Lua... Mar 22 2006, 03:57 PM
Richard Trigaux Info: a meteorite which hit the Earth in the 19th ... Mar 22 2006, 05:41 PM
ljk4-1 Review: Cosmic Collisions
---
The universe is rep... Apr 17 2006, 05:34 PM
RNeuhaus New Insight into Earth’s Early Bombardment
Resea... Apr 18 2006, 02:34 AM
alan Big Bang In Antarctica: Killer Crater Found Under ... Jun 2 2006, 12:58 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 09:31 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|