My Assistant
Power From Solar Panels, How do MER generate so much power? |
Aug 15 2005, 03:16 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 8-June 04 Member No.: 80 |
At the beginning of their missions, both Spirit and Opportunity generated 800 watts of power. I did some searching from the web, and the solar panels I found sold commercially only generate 125 watts at most. I'm far from being an expert in solar power, but how could the solar panels on MER generate far more power on Mars than ones available here on Earth? Does NASA have more advanced solar panels that are not available commercially?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Aug 16 2005, 12:01 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1870 Joined: 20-February 05 Member No.: 174 |
One of the zillion things I wish the rovers had is a real thermal infrared camera. They did take some MiniTES data, don't know about images, at night for surface physical properties analysis. The heating up/cooling down curves tell a lot about grain size and/or cementation of soils, and thermal conductivity stuff about rocks.
You want a cooled detector.. doesn't have to be cryogenic, but below CO2 ice temp helps... wavelength is say 20 to 40 micrometers. CCD cameras work out to about 1.0 or 1.1 max micrometers. "Middle" infrared <definitions vary with discipline> covers reflected radiation from 1 micrometer to about 5 micrometers, where sunlit hot soils start to produce thermal emissions in the afternoon. Beyond 5 micrometers, solar illumination drops more and more and thermal emission takes over. 5 to 15 micrometers work in the daytime, but at night and in winter, you need wavelengths longwards of 15 micrometers to get enough thermal emission to spit at. (15 micrometers is the big atmosphere CO2 opacity band.. Rovers use it to measure atmosphere thermal structure from beneath, orbiters do from above.) A 1-day time lapse image from a thermal IR camera would really tell you a lot about physical properties of rocks and soils we just can't get much of from MiniTES with it's limited sampling at any station during day and night and it's essentially non-imaging resolution. The maps it can make are wonderful scientifically,but they're spectral maps, not images except in the crudest sense. Oh, Well... |
|
|
|
pioneer Power From Solar Panels Aug 15 2005, 03:16 PM
djellison Yes - they are very very expensive, very very effi... Aug 15 2005, 03:27 PM
helvick Doug's right. The cells themselves are very ef... Aug 15 2005, 03:55 PM
djellison Given RTG power - MSL is expected to have about 22... Aug 15 2005, 04:03 PM
helvick QUOTE (djellison @ Aug 15 2005, 05:03 PM)Give... Aug 15 2005, 04:24 PM
Chmee With that much power they could add a light source... Aug 15 2005, 04:58 PM
Marcel QUOTE (Chmee @ Aug 15 2005, 04:58 PM)With tha... Aug 16 2005, 07:16 AM
pioneer Thanks guys. Aug 15 2005, 05:23 PM
deglr6328 The current CCDs on the MERs are also sensitive to... Aug 16 2005, 07:35 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 01:50 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|