My Assistant
The Pioneer Anomaly |
Aug 16 2005, 04:27 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Rover Driver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1015 Joined: 4-March 04 Member No.: 47 |
http://www.planetary.org/news/2005/pioneer_anomaly_faq.html
The planetary society may be checking it out... QUOTE The Planetary Society has committed to raise the funds to preserve the priceless Pioneer data from destruction.
After years of analysis, but without a final conclusion, NASA, astonishingly, gave up trying to solve the "Pioneer Anomaly" and provided no funds to analyze the data. The Pioneer data exists on a few hundred ancient 7- and 9-track magnetic tapes, which can only be read on "antique" outdated computers. The agency is going to scrap, literally demolish, the only computers able to access and process that data in the next few months! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Guest_Richard Trigaux_* |
Sep 3 2005, 09:07 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Guests |
Thanks to recent posters this thread took an interesting turn, that we could summarize that a mission specifically dedicated to the Pionneer anomaly would be potentially very interesting, but that it is not likely to fly one day.
It could become more likely if it is send with other equipments, for instance for the study of solar wind effect, interplanetary magnetic fields, etc. The overal design of such a probe could allow to measure the "Pioneer effect" with much more accuracy, or at least to prove/disprove its existence. How could such a probe work? Basically a test mass, a raw piece of metal, should freely navigate into the solar system, on a trajectory fleeing the sun, while being protected of any spurious accelerations: solar wind, electric/magnetic effecs, outgassing, position control, etc. To achieve this, it would be completelly enclosed into a metal casing, while having no physical contact/interaction with it. The casing would use thrusters to lock itself on a fixed position relative to the test mass. So the overall thing navigates as if it was in really complete vacuum, without solar wind, outgassing, etc. and it can provide accurate informations of pure gravitationnal nature, eventually different of the 1/r2 law, or accounting for unknown bodies. The info on the trajectory corrections achieved by the casing would on its side provide very accurate data on solar wind. This makes this probe more interesting and more likely to fly than just a Pioneer anomaly test probe. The only spurious gravitationnal effect on the test mass would be... the gravitationnal field of the probe itself. Thus the test mass should be placed right at the center of mass of the probe. An error on this would produce a permanent offset that we could not distinguish from true effects. If preleminary calculations show this is a problem, we can use a better overal design: the probe is formed of three parts, linked with cables: at the centre the protective casing, and at the extremities the radio transmitters, thrusters, and any other payload useful for science (and also useful to make this mission more likely). The whole thing rotates on an axis which is perpendicular to the sun direction, right around the test mass. This design will allow to know preciselly the centre of mass and to adjust it. But above all, any permanent offset will be cancelled, as it will pull at times toward the Sun, at times opposite to the Sun. So we can really maintain the test mass free of spurious gravitationnal effects from the probe itself. Such a probe would be relatively light wheight, so that it could be launched on an interstellar trajectory directly from the surface of the Earth, without using gravitationnal assistance. So it could bring results after only a few years. Otherwise we can use Jupiter' assistance. Will this design lead one day to a real experiment? |
|
|
|
Sep 5 2005, 12:13 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2262 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Melbourne - Oz Member No.: 16 |
QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Sep 3 2005, 07:07 PM) How could such a probe work? Basically a test mass, a raw piece of metal, should freely navigate into the solar system, on a trajectory fleeing the sun, while being protected of any spurious accelerations: solar wind, electric/magnetic effecs, outgassing, position control, etc. To achieve this, it would be completelly enclosed into a metal casing, while having no physical contact/interaction with it. The casing would use thrusters to lock itself on a fixed position relative to the test mass. So the overall thing navigates as if it was in really complete vacuum, without solar wind, outgassing, etc. and it can provide accurate informations of pure gravitationnal nature, eventually different of the 1/r2 law, or accounting for unknown bodies. The info on the trajectory corrections achieved by the casing would on its side provide very accurate data on solar wind. This makes this probe more interesting and more likely to fly than just a Pioneer anomaly test probe. The only spurious gravitationnal effect on the test mass would be... the gravitationnal field of the probe itself. Thus the test mass should be placed right at the center of mass of the probe. An error on this would produce a permanent offset that we could not distinguish from true effects. If preleminary calculations show this is a problem, we can use a better overal design: the probe is formed of three parts, linked with cables: at the centre the protective casing, and at the extremities the radio transmitters, thrusters, and any other payload useful for science (and also useful to make this mission more likely). The whole thing rotates on an axis which is perpendicular to the sun direction, right around the test mass. This design will allow to know preciselly the centre of mass and to adjust it. But above all, any permanent offset will be cancelled, as it will pull at times toward the Sun, at times opposite to the Sun. So we can really maintain the test mass free of spurious gravitationnal effects from the probe itself. Such a probe would be relatively light wheight, so that it could be launched on an interstellar trajectory directly from the surface of the Earth, without using gravitationnal assistance. So it could bring results after only a few years. Otherwise we can use Jupiter' assistance. Will this design lead one day to a real experiment? Interesting idea, and pretty much identical to the concept for the LISA gravitational wave mission, which would reduce the costs of such a mission considerably if the systems could be reused. Of cource that would rely on LISA ever geiing off the ground, I wrote a undergraduate report about LISA and that was a long time ago! (~9 years) I can't remember what the planned launch date was back then but I don't think it was more than ten years, today, still ten years (2015)! James -------------------- |
|
|
|
remcook The Pioneer Anomaly Aug 16 2005, 04:27 PM
remcook Some background reading...
http://arxiv.org/find/... Aug 16 2005, 04:40 PM
tedstryk Won't New Horizons be spin stabilized when not... Aug 16 2005, 06:53 PM
Jeff7 QUOTE (remcook @ Aug 16 2005, 11:40 AM)Some b... Aug 17 2005, 07:09 PM
remcook Quote from alan stern:
QUOTE Yes, we spin most of... Aug 16 2005, 07:43 PM
Richard Trigaux Could not the Pioneer tapes be saved on a more mod... Aug 17 2005, 06:37 AM
remcook QUOTE It looks like the Pioneers have long stopped... Aug 17 2005, 08:09 PM
deglr6328 QUOTE (remcook @ Aug 17 2005, 08:09 PM)that... Aug 17 2005, 11:10 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (deglr6328 @ Aug 18 2005, 12:10 AM)Not ... Aug 18 2005, 08:24 AM
Richard Trigaux As far as I understand from readings in the press,... Aug 18 2005, 06:59 AM
The Messenger QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Aug 17 2005, 11:59 P... Aug 26 2005, 09:08 PM
antoniseb QUOTE (The Messenger @ Aug 26 2005, 04:08 PM)... Aug 26 2005, 10:42 PM
The Messenger QUOTE (antoniseb @ Aug 26 2005, 03:42 PM)The ... Aug 29 2005, 05:25 PM
algorimancer It seems to me that a simple means of checking thi... Aug 29 2005, 05:40 PM
The Messenger QUOTE (algorimancer @ Aug 29 2005, 10:40 AM)I... Aug 29 2005, 06:12 PM
edstrick Climate orbiter was not radar tracked, it was tran... Aug 30 2005, 08:52 AM
Mongo QUOTE (edstrick @ Aug 30 2005, 08:52 AM)There... Aug 30 2005, 07:12 PM
Bob Shaw Bill:
Your links, er, don't!
Bob Shaw Aug 31 2005, 11:28 AM
Mongo That's strange; I just clicked on them and the... Aug 31 2005, 02:45 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (Mongo @ Aug 31 2005, 03:45 PM)That... Aug 31 2005, 03:42 PM
Mongo QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Aug 31 2005, 03:42 PM)I pro... Aug 31 2005, 03:57 PM
The Messenger I am at least as interested in the flight path ecc... Aug 31 2005, 06:56 PM
antoniseb QUOTE (The Messenger @ Aug 31 2005, 01:56 PM)... Aug 31 2005, 09:58 PM
dvandorn Hmmm... well, the effect must be very, very minor ... Aug 31 2005, 07:24 PM
Richard Trigaux A rather interesting prospective explanation of th... Sep 3 2005, 10:07 AM
remcook some people seem to agree and applied for funding ... Sep 3 2005, 10:18 AM
The Messenger Richard's proposed test of the Pioneer Anomaly... Sep 3 2005, 05:00 PM
Richard Trigaux Messenger,
my idea was intended to detect a gravi... Sep 4 2005, 07:03 AM
Richard Trigaux The LISA observatory project will use three test m... Sep 5 2005, 08:57 AM
The Messenger All of these approaches use assumptions we should ... Sep 5 2005, 04:28 PM
jamescanvin Heading off topic but...
QUOTE (The Messenger ... Sep 6 2005, 12:17 AM
The Messenger QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Sep 5 2005, 05:17 PM)Hea... Sep 6 2005, 05:53 AM
Richard Trigaux Thanks jamescanvin for the image and the info it c... Sep 6 2005, 06:37 AM
jamescanvin QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Sep 6 2005, 04:37 PM... Sep 7 2005, 12:27 AM
Richard Trigaux QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Sep 7 2005, 12:27 AM)Yes... Sep 7 2005, 05:42 AM
dvandorn Once again, I'm asking a question that I proba... Sep 7 2005, 07:36 AM
Richard Trigaux QUOTE (dvandorn @ Sep 7 2005, 07:36 AM)Does a... Sep 7 2005, 10:28 AM
The Messenger QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Sep 7 2005, 03:28 AM... Sep 8 2005, 06:21 PM
Richard Trigaux QUOTE (The Messenger @ Sep 8 2005, 06:21 PM)I... Sep 9 2005, 07:21 AM
The Messenger QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Sep 9 2005, 12:21 AM... Sep 12 2005, 01:49 PM
Richard Trigaux QUOTE (The Messenger @ Sep 12 2005, 01:49 PM)... Sep 12 2005, 02:23 PM
The Messenger QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Sep 12 2005, 07:23 A... Sep 12 2005, 06:56 PM
Richard Trigaux QUOTE (The Messenger @ Sep 12 2005, 06:56 PM)... Sep 13 2005, 10:15 AM
ljk4-1 QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Sep 13 2005, 05:15 A... Sep 13 2005, 01:17 PM
edstrick I'd have to check, but I think the Apollo 17 i... Sep 7 2005, 08:22 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (edstrick @ Sep 7 2005, 09:22 AM)The in... Sep 7 2005, 09:42 AM

dvandorn QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Sep 7 2005, 04:42 AM)Oooh, ... Sep 7 2005, 06:33 PM

Bob Shaw QUOTE (dvandorn @ Sep 7 2005, 07:33 PM)Oh, th... Sep 7 2005, 08:47 PM
dvandorn QUOTE (edstrick @ Sep 7 2005, 03:22 AM)I... Sep 7 2005, 06:41 PM
edstrick When the gravimeter was proposed, selected and des... Sep 7 2005, 10:38 AM
Richard Trigaux QUOTE (edstrick @ Sep 7 2005, 10:38 AM)When t... Sep 7 2005, 02:38 PM
edstrick "From what I understand, though, even with th... Sep 8 2005, 10:49 AM
edstrick It has been hoped that cosmic sources of gravitati... Sep 9 2005, 07:45 AM
Richard Trigaux QUOTE (edstrick @ Sep 9 2005, 07:45 AM)As far... Sep 9 2005, 08:17 AM
The Messenger Suggestions, by anyone, of engineering on this sca... Sep 13 2005, 04:16 PM
Richard Trigaux QUOTE (The Messenger @ Sep 13 2005, 04:16 PM)... Sep 13 2005, 06:06 PM
The Messenger Returning to the Pioneer Anomally:
You may or may... Sep 14 2005, 03:31 PM
Richard Trigaux Messenger, yes the Earth does have a "gravita... Sep 14 2005, 03:46 PM
ljk4-1 http://www.issi.unibe.ch/teams/Pioneer/
The Pione... Oct 3 2005, 04:46 AM
edstrick ljk4-1: "...The Pioneer Explorer Collaboratio... Oct 3 2005, 07:15 AM
Richard Trigaux Thanks ljk4-1 for your interesting contribution. A... Oct 3 2005, 08:15 AM
deglr6328 sooooo did the planetary soc. get the data or what... Oct 3 2005, 09:53 AM
elakdawalla QUOTE (deglr6328 @ Oct 3 2005, 02:53 AM)soooo... Nov 10 2005, 01:29 AM
ljk4-1 QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Nov 9 2005, 08:29 PM) We... Nov 10 2005, 02:33 PM
elakdawalla QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Nov 10 2005, 07:33 AM)De... Nov 10 2005, 04:46 PM
edstrick <grin> by "anomaly" I mean an ord... Oct 3 2005, 09:57 AM
Richard Trigaux QUOTE (edstrick @ Oct 3 2005, 09:57 AM)<gr... Oct 3 2005, 12:40 PM
edstrick Aliens?... I thought it was the CIA and FBI.... or... Oct 4 2005, 06:27 AM
Richard Trigaux QUOTE (edstrick @ Oct 4 2005, 06:27 AM)Aliens... Oct 4 2005, 07:37 AM
edstrick You know what the problem is with make-believe par... Oct 4 2005, 10:51 AM
Richard Trigaux QUOTE (edstrick @ Oct 4 2005, 10:51 AM)You kn... Oct 4 2005, 04:41 PM
ljk4-1 Astrophysics, abstract
astro-ph/0504367
From: Gary... Oct 4 2005, 07:35 PM
ljk4-1 Paper: astro-ph/0506281
replaced with revised ve... Oct 26 2005, 02:08 PM
ljk4-1 Paper (*cross-listing*): gr-qc/0511026
Date: Sun... Nov 9 2005, 04:32 PM
Myran Calculations using the 'MOND' theory (Modi... Nov 9 2005, 09:10 PM
Richard Trigaux I wonder if we could do any theory of any kind, ad... Nov 9 2005, 09:21 PM
mike That's what a theory is. Nov 9 2005, 09:42 PM
Myran QUOTE Richard Trigaux said: I wonder if we could d... Nov 10 2005, 05:21 AM
lyford Call me old fashioned, but I am a bit wary of jett... Nov 10 2005, 06:41 AM
The Messenger QUOTE (lyford @ Nov 9 2005, 11:41 PM)Call me ... Nov 10 2005, 04:44 PM
lyford QUOTE (The Messenger @ Nov 10 2005, 08:44 AM)... Nov 10 2005, 10:06 PM
ljk4-1 Astrophysics, abstract
astro-ph/0505310
From: Mic... Dec 20 2005, 04:05 PM
ljk4-1 General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, abstract... Jan 3 2006, 02:31 AM
tfisher I just read through the last paper linked. They... Jan 3 2006, 07:10 AM
ljk4-1 Paper: astro-ph/0504367
Date (v1): Sun, 17 Apr 20... Jan 4 2006, 06:18 PM
tasp I bet it is not as simple as this, but I will pos... Jan 5 2006, 04:14 AM
mchan QUOTE (tasp @ Jan 4 2006, 08:14 PM)Any possib... Jan 5 2006, 06:06 AM
ugordan QUOTE (mchan @ Jan 5 2006, 07:06 AM)One probl... Jan 5 2006, 08:52 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 5 2006, 09:52 AM)Wasn... Jan 5 2006, 01:16 PM
ljk4-1 Can New Horizons participate in this experiment? ... Jan 5 2006, 02:22 PM
djellison QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Jan 5 2006, 02:22 PM)Can... Jan 5 2006, 02:43 PM
ugordan QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 5 2006, 03:43 PM)That... Jan 5 2006, 02:50 PM
tasp If an objection to putting a Voyager into a slow s... Jan 5 2006, 02:45 PM
djellison Damn good point actually UG - hadnt thought of tha... Jan 5 2006, 02:58 PM
ugordan QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 5 2006, 03:58 PM)Then ... Jan 5 2006, 03:05 PM
NMRguy QUOTE (Alan Stern @ Feb 23 2005, 09:20 AM)Yes... Jan 5 2006, 05:19 PM
AlexBlackwell QUOTE (NMRguy @ Jan 5 2006, 05:19 PM)Alan add... Jan 5 2006, 05:56 PM
tty QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 5 2006, 05:05 PM)Might h... Jan 5 2006, 06:47 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 03:59 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|