IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V  « < 3 4 5  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
James Webb Space Telescope, information, updates and discussion
Big_Gazza
post Jul 7 2011, 10:42 AM
Post #61


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 66
Joined: 8-November 05
From: Australia
Member No.: 547



Oh dear, the spectre of cancellation of the JWST is being raised... mad.gif

http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n1107/06jwst/

I can think of a few expenditures that can be slashed to pay for the HST successor....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Syrinx
post Jul 7 2011, 09:38 PM
Post #62


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 128
Joined: 31-May 08
From: San Jose, California, USA
Member No.: 4168



I became ill when I read about this yesterday.

I think a lot of us want to say some things that would violate UMSF's posting terms.

I'll just say it made me consider (someday) moving to a different country. And I know my sentiment is shared by a lot of engineers.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jul 7 2011, 11:08 PM
Post #63


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 6954
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Let's all take a deep breath, calm down, and hope for the best...and keep Rule 1.2 firmly in mind.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Explorer1
post Jul 8 2011, 12:58 AM
Post #64


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 887
Joined: 13-February 10
From: British Columbia
Member No.: 5221



Surely the components already made won't be trashed, will they? (Assuming this actually happens; remember Dawn's resurrections!)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hungry4info
post Jul 8 2011, 03:12 AM
Post #65


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1006
Joined: 26-July 08
Member No.: 4270



If it goes like SIM(-lite), the hardware will probably be disposed of.


--------------------
-- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Hullender
post Jul 8 2011, 02:56 PM
Post #66


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1010
Joined: 29-November 05
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Member No.: 590



If no one has any new facts to bring to the discussion, I'm not sure we can accomplish much just speculating about it. I remember Kepler was in trouble at one point for similar reasons (poor management) and NASA forced them to reorganize, but I don't remember the details. Does anyone know any details?

--Greg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jul 9 2011, 12:19 AM
Post #67


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 6954
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Also recall that Dawn WAS effectively cancelled for many of the same reasons, but of course did fly. It's way, way too early to begin mourning for JWST, people.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mongo
post Sep 15 2011, 09:03 PM
Post #68


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 631
Joined: 13-June 04
Member No.: 82



News Flash: James Webb Space Telescope SAVED!

The news has just come in: the United States Senate has decided to fully fund the James Webb Space Telescope, and it should be set to launch in 2018, which is the earliest it can possibly go ahead at this point.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Sep 15 2011, 09:59 PM
Post #69


Administrator
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 13709
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



How many times do I have to clean up this thread because of rule 1.2?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V  « < 3 4 5
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st August 2014 - 11:54 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.