IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Batteries, What if they're "broken"
Marcel
post Sep 7 2005, 01:48 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 290
Joined: 26-March 04
From: Edam, The Netherlands
Member No.: 65



I was wondering: since (especially Spirit) dust accumulation isn't a big concern anymore nowadays, we come to the next vulnerable part of the rovers, being their batteries (which has been discussed some months ago in another thread).
I read that it could take a 1000 load-reload cycles before their capacity declines. Now, suppose that the batteries are history by sol 1000 and they don't have any capacity left: then what ?

Would the rover be dead ? Or would it boot up at sunrise again every morning and be able to do any science or driving solely on the array output ? And could this mean that not even the batteries are a possible fatal malfunction (and thus, the rovers could still continue to stay in touch) ? In that case, this mission could continue well beyond any expectation we all have. A potential fatal breakdown of a cricial (not redundant) part could take many years litterally. Especially thinking about the semiconductors that are so tough, cabling that has been made for the environment up there, everything prooved to be so sustaining, that it gets quite hard to think of anything that ends it right away. They work, they prooved to work for muuuuuuch longer than expected and there's no RTG that can run out of energy.

I want MSL to have arrays. And i want it to land in a windy place.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
djellison
post Sep 8 2005, 12:29 PM
Post #2


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Well - look at Voyager. 25 years + with an RTG.

I really really cant see how a solar array could help extend that on Mars.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Marcel   Batteries   Sep 7 2005, 01:48 PM
- - chuckyvt   I'm pretty sure I remember reading somewhere a...   Sep 7 2005, 02:12 PM
|- - tty   QUOTE (chuckyvt @ Sep 7 2005, 04:12 PM)I...   Sep 7 2005, 04:59 PM
- - RNeuhaus   A new technology, nanotubes carbon will improve th...   Sep 7 2005, 03:13 PM
- - djellison   BUT.... it required lots of surface area, doesnt ...   Sep 7 2005, 03:58 PM
|- - RNeuhaus   QUOTE (djellison @ Sep 7 2005, 10:58 AM)BUT.....   Sep 7 2005, 05:07 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (djellison @ Sep 7 2005, 03:58 PM)BUT.....   Sep 8 2005, 06:44 AM
|- - djellison   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Sep 8 2005, 06:44 AM...   Sep 8 2005, 07:58 AM
|- - abalone   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Sep 8 2005, 05:44 PM...   Sep 8 2005, 10:02 AM
||- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (abalone @ Sep 8 2005, 10:02 AM)RTGs em...   Sep 8 2005, 09:10 PM
||- - abalone   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Sep 9 2005, 08:10 AM...   Sep 8 2005, 10:57 PM
||- - SFJCody   QUOTE (abalone @ Sep 8 2005, 10:57 PM)This is...   Sep 8 2005, 11:12 PM
|- - abalone   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Sep 8 2005, 05:44 PM...   Sep 8 2005, 11:33 AM
- - abalone   QUOTE (Marcel @ Sep 8 2005, 12:48 AM)I read t...   Sep 8 2005, 09:55 AM
- - edstrick   The plutonium is primarily an alpha emitter, but t...   Sep 8 2005, 10:14 AM
|- - abalone   QUOTE (edstrick @ Sep 8 2005, 09:14 PM)The pl...   Sep 8 2005, 10:34 AM
|- - Marcel   Funny it came to the RTG discussion again. I did n...   Sep 8 2005, 11:39 AM
- - djellison   Well - look at Voyager. 25 years + with an RTG. ...   Sep 8 2005, 12:29 PM
- - Marcel   I guess you're right about that. Don't kno...   Sep 8 2005, 01:21 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 06:35 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.