IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Pandora Rev14 Nt, Pandora's close-up
um3k
post Sep 7 2005, 03:03 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 345
Joined: 2-May 05
Member No.: 372



Here are all the images from Cassini's recent Pandora encounter:




(final 5 images in next post)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
um3k
post Sep 7 2005, 03:06 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 345
Joined: 2-May 05
Member No.: 372



(continued from previous post)



I'll post a color image soon, if someone else doesn't beat me to it.

Pandora is a very strange place, indeed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
um3k
post Sep 7 2005, 03:42 PM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 345
Joined: 2-May 05
Member No.: 372



Here's color (IR3, UV3, P0+GRN; top left), as well as a 3d anaglyph (top right) and a cross-eyed stereo pair (bottom).
JPEG (low quality, fast download):
Attached Image

PNG (high quality, slow download):
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Sep 7 2005, 07:22 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



Is it just me, or do most of the craters on Pandora seem to be in advanced states of erosional degradation?

Also, there is a highly interesting pattern of radial spokes within the crater roughly midway between "top" and "bottom" in thiese images, about a quarter of the width of the images to the right of the terminator.

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Sep 7 2005, 07:46 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Probably not erosion. I suspect that dust from the F-ring has mantled the surface, giving it an overall muted appearance, by shallowing smaller craters and covering over the smallest craters.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Sep 8 2005, 10:55 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



um3k, I had same idea about producing false color (IR3, UV3, GRN) image, then an enhanced color version (lot of work to minimize cosmic rays tracks):

Attached Image


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
um3k
post Sep 9 2005, 02:00 AM
Post #7


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 345
Joined: 2-May 05
Member No.: 372



QUOTE (dilo @ Sep 8 2005, 06:55 PM)
um3k, I had same idea about producing false color (IR3, UV3, GRN) image, then an enhanced color version (lot of work to minimize cosmic rays tracks):

Attached Image

*

Very cool! I've made a super-res image, I'll upload it soon. It is made of three images, I can't do more than that due to motion issues. I didn't do much cosmic ray removal, either. But it's still pretty decent. wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
um3k
post Sep 9 2005, 02:24 AM
Post #8


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 345
Joined: 2-May 05
Member No.: 372



Here's that superres I promised you:

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Sep 9 2005, 03:05 AM
Post #9


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4408
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (um3k @ Sep 9 2005, 02:24 AM)
Here's that superres I promised you:

Attached Image

*


Nice work! I can't wait to see what that will do when we have raw data to use!


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Sep 10 2005, 08:54 AM
Post #10


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



QUOTE (um3k @ Sep 9 2005, 02:24 AM)
Here's that superres I promised you:

Attached Image

*

Interesting!... is it possible to remove jpeg artifacts in order to better see details?


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Sep 10 2005, 11:57 AM
Post #11


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1279
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



QUOTE (dilo @ Sep 10 2005, 04:54 AM)
Interesting!... is it possible to remove jpeg artifacts in order to better see details?
*



Lots of topics on google...

http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&rls=GGLG...tifacts&spell=1
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Sep 13 2005, 11:50 AM
Post #12


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10265
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



um3k's super-res pic is very nice... I hadn't noticed the set of grooves near the terminator before (I'm only geting very brief glimpses of things). I'm very fond of grooves.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
um3k
post Sep 13 2005, 02:54 PM
Post #13


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 345
Joined: 2-May 05
Member No.: 372



Thank you for your compliments, everyone! I think I might do a rotation movie later today. wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
um3k
post Sep 13 2005, 10:40 PM
Post #14


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 345
Joined: 2-May 05
Member No.: 372



Here's that rotation movie I promised:
Attached Image


Sorry, no noise reduction.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Sep 15 2005, 05:05 AM
Post #15


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Finally, thanks to um3k animantion, I was able to do make 3D Pandora images:
anaglyph:
Attached Image
crossed eyes:
Attached Image

Imperfections are due to slight illumination change...


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_BruceMoomaw_*
post Sep 15 2005, 06:05 AM
Post #16





Guests






Those grooves make it look even more like Phobos. By the way, http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2005/pdf/1186.pdf suggests that the grooves on Phobos are not crackes in its actual structure produced by the Stickney impact, but are instead tracks plowed in the regolith by big ejecta blocks from Stickney as they bounced and rolled across the surface.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Toma B
post Nov 16 2005, 02:32 PM
Post #17


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 648
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Subotica
Member No.: 384



Finally there is oficial image of Pandora on Cassini main page...
Nice!!!



Cassini's best close-up view of Saturn's F ring shepherd moon, Pandora, shows that this small ring-moon is coated in fine dust-sized icy material.

Craters formed on this object by impacts appear to be covered by debris, a process that probably happens rapidly in a geologic sense. The grooves and small ridges on Pandora (84 kilometers, or 52 miles across) suggest that fractures affect the overlying smooth material.

The crisp craters on another Saturn moon, Hyperion, provide a contrasting example of craters on a small object (see PIA07740).

Cassini acquired infrared, green and ultraviolet images on Sept. 5, 2005, which were combined to create this false-color view. The image was taken with the Cassini spacecraft narrow-angle camera at a distance of approximately 52,000 kilometers (32,000 miles) from Pandora and at a Sun-Pandora-spacecraft, or phase, angle of 54 degrees. Resolution in the original image was about 300 meters (1,000 feet) per pixel. The image has been magnified by a factor of two to aid visibility.


--------------------
The scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, and he delights in it because it is beautiful.
Jules H. Poincare

My "Astrophotos" gallery on flickr...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Nov 16 2005, 02:55 PM
Post #18


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10265
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Bruce commented (some time ago) on a suggestion that the grooves on Phobos may be caused by ejecta from its big crater stickney rather than as surface expressions of deep fractures.

This reference:

http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/do...fobjectid=36756

suggests that Mars basin ejecta did the deed instead. Personally (IM not-so-H O) I think Murray does a better job than Wilson and Head of making the case for ejecta. I prefer a fracture explanation myself, and I have suggested previously that the fractures responsible may be more like terrestrial jointing, produced by relaxation after excavation from a parent body. At any rate, fractures or ejecta, the tie to Stickney is very dubious.

This dispute is why I have a particular interest in scrutinizing small bodies for evidence of grooves. It's nice to see a few on Pandora.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 04:43 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.