IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Stereo Home Plate!, long-baseline 3D visualization
dilo
post Sep 16 2005, 06:28 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



I used Sol583 and Sol595 PanCam l256 color images to obtain this nice crossed eyed South view:
Attached Image

This is a 3x stretch enlarged detail of HomePlate (a little bit noisy but showing 3D structure):
Attached Image

I will make soon analglyphed versions... (maybe someone else before me! wink.gif )


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >  
Start new topic
Replies (15 - 29)
Bill Harris
post Sep 20 2005, 06:13 PM
Post #16


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3009
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



Although "we" call the feature behind Homeplate "Cindercone", it's just a convenient name and not an accurate description. First impression was a cindercone, but it seems ot be more of a mesa capped with a resistant rock.

Geologists assign names oddly.

In PaintShop Pro (and I presume PShop) there is a specific menu item where you can spit a 24-bit image into it's component RGB channels, it's
Image->SplitChannel->Split to RGB. You'll end up with three 8-bit grayscale images, each with info for the R,G or B channels. Just save the Red, and a Blue or Green. I disremember which is for the right eye and the left eye.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
general
post Sep 20 2005, 06:26 PM
Post #17


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 236
Joined: 21-June 05
Member No.: 417



QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Sep 20 2005, 08:13 PM)
Although "we" call the feature behind Homeplate  "Cindercone", it's just a convenient name and not an accurate description.  First impression was a cindercone, but it seems ot be more of a mesa capped with a resistant rock.
--Bill
*



I propose the name "Pitcher's mound" cool.gif rolleyes.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bedrockshock
post Sep 20 2005, 11:52 PM
Post #18


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 9
Joined: 17-March 05
Member No.: 210



Anyone interested in a good paper involving probably the Largest known shatter cones can check this linkNew Constraints on the Slate Islands impact structure, Ontario, Canada

A good photo by V. L. Sharpton taken of these monsters is used in "Traces of Catastrphe" by Bevan M. French which used to be available from Johnson Space Center.

Most of the photos I found on the web were poor.


Enjoy

Mike Farley
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
aldo12xu
post Sep 21 2005, 01:56 AM
Post #19


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 320
Joined: 19-June 04
Member No.: 85



Damn, I lived in Thunder Bay, which is 100km to the west, from 1976-86 and I never heard of the Slate Islands as being a meteorite impact site. Here's another good site on the Slate Islands. No close-ups of the shatter cones, though

http://ottawa.rasc.ca/astronomy/earth_craters/slate_islands/


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Sep 21 2005, 05:42 AM
Post #20


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



Yeah Bill, I know what you mean. But I kind of like general's suggestion for a place name. That's one that could stick.

bedrockshock: I'd love to see that PDF, but I keep getting a 404 error. That's possibly the area with the one that Bob mentioned. Has anyone else gotten that file?

aldo12xu: I think the little patch of sloping caprock on the Pitcher's mound is a significant clue, as are other patches of caprock in the basin. I'm not certain they all are the same layer, but they might be related. Regarding anaglyphs; there are a number of sites on the net that describe the process. If we need to get into it further, it can be discussed in the "imagery and tech" forum. But essentially, you are correct. I'm still trying to refine my techniques. Here are two sites that have useful information. There are a number of others.

http://www.scec.org/geowall/makeanaglyph.html
http://www.crystalcanyons.net/Pages/3DGuid...tereoWindow.htm


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Sep 21 2005, 06:19 AM
Post #21


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3009
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



"Pitcher's Mound" works for me.

It seems to me that the caprock on Pitcher's Mound is like the Homeplate caprock with another uneroded unit over it. We'll see it close-up soon enough.

That "404'ed" shattercone PDF seems to be at:

http://www.gi.alaska.edu/~rherrick/reprint...ologySlates.pdf

note _~rherrick_ NOT _~rherricks_. I got to the Robert Herrick homepage but didn't download the PDF (dialup, ya know). The Geological Institute site seems interesting, ditto the http://www.gi.alaska.edu/~rherrick page.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Sep 21 2005, 03:34 PM
Post #22


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



QUOTE (bedrockshock @ Sep 21 2005, 12:52 AM)
Anyone interested in a good paper involving probably the Largest known shatter cones can check this linkNew Constraints on the Slate Islands impact structure, Ontario, Canada

A  good photo by V. L. Sharpton taken of these monsters is used in "Traces of Catastrphe" by Bevan M. French which used to be available from Johnson Space Center.

Most of the photos I found on the web were poor.
Enjoy

Mike Farley
*


Mike:

That paper describes a shatter cone structure which could be 20m across the base, if it conforms to the typical morpholgy! Having said that, it formed in a ~32km crater...

I wonder if the shatter cone image I recall was in French's 'The Moon Book'?

Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bedrockshock
post Sep 21 2005, 11:54 PM
Post #23


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 9
Joined: 17-March 05
Member No.: 210



Thank you Bill Harris for fixing my Slate Islands link problem. I don't necessarily belive the cinder cone like features at home plate are shatter cones but I knew large cones existed at the Sudbury and Slate Islands Impacts. The survival of large Sudbury cones at its heavily eroded age should make shatter cones at Home plate concievable, although I doubt Sudbury ever expierienced the aolian process Gusev has seen.

If I find a nice photo of the Slate Islands shatter cone I "try" to post a link.

Thanks Mike
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Oct 8 2005, 10:13 AM
Post #24


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Time to make better 3D views using larger Sol583=>Sol621 baseline (almost 35m in H-P direction, based on last route map):

Anaglyph:
Attached Image
crossed-eyes:
Attached Image
3x stretch:
Attached Image


From last image, Spirit should "attack" HomePlate coming from NE or SE direction (smaller slopes...)


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Oct 8 2005, 10:21 AM
Post #25


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



..forgot stretched anaglyph...
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nix
post Oct 8 2005, 10:27 AM
Post #26


Chief Assistant
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1409
Joined: 5-January 05
From: Ierapetra, Greece
Member No.: 136



mad.gif you're keeping me out of my work dilo with your images tongue.gif

Nice stereo stuff, I think I'm going to have a long good look at the features visible!

Nico


--------------------
photographer, space imagery enthusiast, proud father and partner, and geek.


http://500px.com/sacred-photons &
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Oct 8 2005, 10:50 AM
Post #27


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



QUOTE (NIX @ Oct 8 2005, 10:27 AM)
mad.gif you're keeping me out of my work dilo with your images tongue.gif
*

biggrin.gif wink.gif


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Oct 8 2005, 01:28 PM
Post #28


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3009
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



Whew, methinks that dilo has been busy!

Actually, Spirit needs court and romance Homplate from that beautiful Northwest and West vertical wall and then drive on top to attack... (smilie for a vicarious leer)

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Oct 8 2005, 06:19 PM
Post #29


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



Looking at Dilo's excellent 3-D images, I wonder if that is another mini version of Home Plate on the edge of the hillock to the right, but seen in profile?

Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Oct 8 2005, 06:32 PM
Post #30


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3009
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



That hillock has been called "Pitcher's Mound" (initially "Cindercone"), and yes, I think that it is the Homeplate unit, with some of an uneroded overlying unit (more rust-orange) above it.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 12:31 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.