IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Rev 16 - Oct 2-21, 2005 - Telesto, Tethys, Dione D1, Dione-Telesto-Enceladus
jmknapp
post Oct 9 2005, 08:46 PM
Post #16


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1061
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



How bright is Saturn-shine, compared to the normal sunshine?

How good of a picture can they get of the shadowed side under a full Saturn?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Oct 9 2005, 09:30 PM
Post #17


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4061
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (ugordan @ Oct 8 2005, 08:55 PM)
Ah, you're right. Just checked, Voyagers' digital tape recorders have a 500 megabit capacity... rolleyes.gif
*


I remember reading somewhere that it could hold thirty-something images.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_BruceMoomaw_*
post Oct 9 2005, 09:53 PM
Post #18





Guests






More like 100 images per recorder (or a little more; I'd have to recheck, but it's definitely over 100 each).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_BruceMoomaw_*
post Oct 9 2005, 09:53 PM
Post #19





Guests






Oh, excuse me; I thought you were referring to CASSINI'S recorders. Voyager's, I don't know about.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Oct 10 2005, 01:12 PM
Post #20


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4061
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



Does anyone know if the NT of Enceladus will be used? If it covers any "new" territory, it seems like a great opportunity. Also, repeat coverage for Enceladus is much more important than for a moon like Iapetus, since change detection is a priority.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Oct 10 2005, 01:45 PM
Post #21


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3538
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (tedstryk @ Oct 10 2005, 03:12 PM)
Does anyone know if the NT of Enceladus will be used?  If it covers any "new" territory, it seems like a great opportunity.  Also, repeat coverage for Enceladus is much more important than for a moon like Iapetus, since change detection is a priority.
*


Earlier in the thread I said:
"While Cassini will make a fairly close non-targeted approach to Enceladus, from the recently released Dione flyby description I figure there aren't any Enceladus observations programmed. Instead, the spacecraft will be engaged in a rather lengthy data downlink session at the time of C/A to Enceladus."

From 42 000 km, 74 deg phase, there is an opportunity for some pretty good ISS NA coverage, perhaps a 4x4 mosaic, but as I said, I don't believe any actual observations are planned... unsure.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Oct 10 2005, 01:54 PM
Post #22


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3538
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Oct 9 2005, 11:53 PM)
Oh, excuse me; I thought you were referring to CASSINI'S recorders.  Voyager's, I don't know about.
*


Well, if the figure for the 500 megabit (around 64 megabytes) Voyager recorder is true, IIRC the resolution of the Voyager ISS cameras is about 800x800 so that's about 640 kb per image. That would indeed turn out to be around 100 images max -- the advantage that Voyagers had over Cassini is that they could downlink new images in real time (at least during Jupiter and Saturn encounters) so the storage limit probably wasn't that big of an issue as is with Cassini.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Oct 10 2005, 03:00 PM
Post #23


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4061
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



Data Storage Subsystem
----------------------
The Digital Tape Recorder (DTR) was used to store data when
real-time communications with Earth were either not possible
or not scheduled. The DTR recorded data on eight tracks;
rates were 115.2 kilobits per second (record only), 21.6
kilobits per second (playback only), and 7.2 kilobits per
second (record and playback). Capacity of each track was 12
images or equivalent.

My original figure was based on the Uranus encounter. I forgot that this was shared with the other instruments.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JRehling
post Oct 10 2005, 03:07 PM
Post #24


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1519
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 321



QUOTE (jmknapp @ Oct 9 2005, 01:46 PM)
How bright is Saturn-shine, compared to the normal sunshine?

How good of a picture can they get of the shadowed side under a full Saturn?
*


It depends on which moon, and which phase Saturn is in from the moon's perspective. To answer this question without doing any math, I can tell you that they got very good saturnshine images of Iapetus, so have no fears about Dione, which receives orders of magnitude more saturnshine. The downside is that closer moons mean higher relative velocity, and thus shorter exposure times, but the added luminance will surely make up for that. We should get great images.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Oct 10 2005, 03:09 PM
Post #25


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1153
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



I really want the scan platform now. sad.gif

Out of all the things to cut from the final design. blink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Oct 10 2005, 03:23 PM
Post #26


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3538
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (Decepticon @ Oct 10 2005, 05:09 PM)
I really want the scan platform now. sad.gif

Out of all the things to cut from the final design. blink.gif
*


Look at the bright side, instrument pointing turned out to be more accurate and steady (Dr. Carolyn Porco described the spacecraft as a "tripod in space" smile.gif ) this way than it would have been with a scan platform. I don't miss the scan platform that much though it would have been nice to have a real-time downlink capability on Cassini instead of the 15 hr observation/9 hr downlink scheme...

Plus, it's one thing less to worry about getting stuck...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Oct 13 2005, 01:53 AM
Post #27


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1153
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



New pics In!



http://saturn1.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/ima...?browseLatest=1
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Oct 13 2005, 01:54 AM
Post #28


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1153
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



I have NO WORDS! blink.gif blink.gif biggrin.gif biggrin.gif biggrin.gif biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Oct 13 2005, 02:13 AM
Post #29


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1153
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



Ahh here we go. http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...heQ=0&storedQ=0
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Oct 13 2005, 02:13 AM
Post #30


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1620
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



Telesto
http://saturn1.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/ima...5/N00041281.jpg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 04:15 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.