IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

T8 Titan Flyby Oct 28,05, Flyby Discussion
Decepticon
post Oct 1 2005, 01:43 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1279
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



Another flyby coming soon. Interesting observations include radar swath of Huygens landing site.

Just before CA. http://space.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/wspace?t...porbs=1&brite=1

From above... http://space.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/wspace?t...porbs=1&brite=1

I really missed VP encounter updates sad.gif So I tried my best at showing the Hemisphere to be imaged during the flyby.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
elakdawalla
post Oct 26 2005, 02:10 PM
Post #2


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



OK, what the heck is going on with the longitudes in these maps?

Maybe it's too early in the morning for me to be thinking hard but I think there are errors in the longitudes on both the imaging coverage and the RADAR maps. Can somebody please check and tell me if I'm right about that?

I think the imaging coverage map is centered at 180 degrees, but it is labeled as 0 degrees.

I think that the third RADAR globe, the one that shows the T8 swath, has a "120" where it should have a "240."

Am I crazy? They switch their convention all the time, using 180 sometimes and 0 sometimes as the center longitude, but I don't think I've noticed errors before.

--Emily


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JRehling
post Oct 26 2005, 03:58 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2530
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 321



QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Oct 26 2005, 07:10 AM)
OK, what the heck is going on with the longitudes in these maps?

Maybe it's too early in the morning for me to be thinking hard but I think there are errors in the longitudes on both the imaging coverage and the RADAR maps.  Can somebody please check and tell me if I'm right about that?
--Emily
*


You're definitely right. Look at Photojournal. The Radar releases and the T8 preview maps are almost consecutive image listings. Xanadu and Mezzoramia are clearly seen on both maps, and it looks like they either goofed the Radar map by 180 degrees, or maybe made even more serious goofs. Hope they rectify this and withdraw the mislabeled images.

http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/targetFamily/Saturn
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Oct 26 2005, 05:26 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



QUOTE (JRehling @ Oct 26 2005, 08:58 AM)
You're definitely right. Look at Photojournal. The Radar releases and the T8 preview maps are almost consecutive image listings. Xanadu and Mezzoramia are clearly seen on both maps, and it looks like they either goofed the Radar map by 180 degrees, or maybe made even more serious goofs. Hope they rectify this and withdraw the mislabeled images.

http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/targetFamily/Saturn
*

No, we messed up. The last four flyby maps have all been centered at 0 West since that is where most of the coverage is and this is the first flyby since February to switch back to the Shangri-la side. I didn't catch the error till three hours before the image went live ohmy.gif The map is centered on 180 West, regardless of the labels... grrr...

I'm talking about the ISS coverage map. Haven't looked at the RADAR coverage map to closely yet. Why didn't they ask us if they could use our base map?


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Oct 26 2005, 05:44 PM
Post #5


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



QUOTE (volcanopele @ Oct 26 2005, 10:26 AM)
No, we messed up.  The last four flyby maps have all been centered at 0 West since that is where most of the coverage is and this is the first flyby since February to switch back to the Shangri-la side.  I didn't catch the error till three hours before the image went live ohmy.gif  The map is centered on 180 West, regardless of the labels...  grrr...

I'm talking about the ISS coverage map.  Haven't looked at the RADAR coverage map to closely yet.  Why didn't they ask us if they could use our base map?
*


Glad to hear I'm not crazy. I've heard back from the RADAR team that that is a typo too, it should be 240.

I get so confused trying to figure out what's what in these maps (leading? trailing?) - and I forget so often that the ISS maps are truncated just above 60 degrees North -- that I've started to doctor all the maps that I use on our website so that they show a consistent point of view -- centered at 180 and (for now) truncated just above 60 N. I just did the same for the recent RADAR map -- makes it easier to compare where the coverage was. (I also corrected the ISS map longitude while I was at it.)

Attached Image
Attached Image


As for why they didn't use the ISS base map, Rosaly Lopes told me that they wanted to make it more obvious where the RADAR coverage had gotten to so far. I am looking forward to seeing more and more of that blue background getting covered up over the course of the mission.

--Emily


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Decepticon   T8 Titan Flyby Oct 28,05   Oct 1 2005, 01:43 PM
- - David   QUOTE (Decepticon @ Oct 1 2005, 01:43 PM)Anot...   Oct 1 2005, 04:32 PM
- - volcanopele   that's the entry point into the atmosphere, no...   Oct 1 2005, 04:39 PM
- - Decepticon   Only 8 days away! Looking forward to combini...   Oct 20 2005, 12:57 PM
|- - jmknapp   QUOTE (Decepticon @ Oct 20 2005, 08:57 AM)Onl...   Oct 20 2005, 07:48 PM
- - RPascal   One of the most exciting questions for me is, if t...   Oct 21 2005, 01:36 PM
|- - ugordan   QUOTE (RPascal @ Oct 21 2005, 03:36 PM)Does a...   Oct 21 2005, 01:57 PM
|- - jmknapp   QUOTE (ugordan @ Oct 21 2005, 09:57 AM)My une...   Oct 21 2005, 06:35 PM
||- - ugordan   QUOTE (jmknapp @ Oct 21 2005, 08:35 PM)Here...   Oct 23 2005, 12:20 PM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (ugordan @ Oct 21 2005, 06:57 AM)My une...   Oct 23 2005, 04:11 PM
|- - ljk4-1   QUOTE (JRehling @ Oct 23 2005, 11:11 AM)At C/...   Oct 24 2005, 02:03 PM
|- - jmknapp   The science plan has "T8 Inbound Altimetry...   Oct 24 2005, 02:54 PM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Oct 24 2005, 07:03 AM)Is...   Oct 24 2005, 03:16 PM
- - alan   QUOTE (RPascal @ Oct 21 2005, 01:36 PM)One of...   Oct 21 2005, 02:38 PM
|- - RPascal   QUOTE (alan @ Oct 21 2005, 03:38 PM)The mosai...   Oct 24 2005, 04:00 PM
- - Decepticon   Encouter Update! http://saturn1.jpl.nasa.gov/...   Oct 26 2005, 02:00 AM
- - elakdawalla   OK, what the heck is going on with the longitudes ...   Oct 26 2005, 02:10 PM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Oct 26 2005, 07:10 AM)OK...   Oct 26 2005, 03:58 PM
|- - volcanopele   QUOTE (JRehling @ Oct 26 2005, 08:58 AM)You...   Oct 26 2005, 05:26 PM
|- - elakdawalla   QUOTE (volcanopele @ Oct 26 2005, 10:26 AM)No...   Oct 26 2005, 05:44 PM
- - volcanopele   To make it all up to all of you, here is the RADAR...   Oct 26 2005, 06:01 PM
|- - elakdawalla   QUOTE (volcanopele @ Oct 26 2005, 11:01 AM)To...   Oct 26 2005, 06:06 PM
||- - volcanopele   QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Oct 26 2005, 11:06 AM)Ju...   Oct 26 2005, 06:20 PM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (volcanopele @ Oct 26 2005, 11:01 AM)To...   Oct 26 2005, 06:28 PM
- - volcanopele   Some thoughts: 1) If you like cat scratches, you ...   Oct 26 2005, 06:16 PM
|- - jmknapp   Question on Cassini pointing: does the pointing of...   Oct 27 2005, 03:20 PM
|- - ugordan   QUOTE (jmknapp @ Oct 27 2005, 05:20 PM)Questi...   Oct 27 2005, 04:02 PM
|- - jmknapp   QUOTE (ugordan @ Oct 27 2005, 12:02 PM)There...   Oct 27 2005, 07:09 PM
- - volcanopele   Near 11.3 South, 190 West.   Oct 27 2005, 08:09 PM
|- - jmknapp   Thanks--here's a cool animation. I've been...   Oct 27 2005, 09:09 PM
- - Decepticon   Are there any NT on this Rev?   Oct 28 2005, 12:00 PM
|- - jmknapp   QUOTE (Decepticon @ Oct 28 2005, 08:00 AM)Are...   Oct 28 2005, 12:31 PM
|- - ugordan   QUOTE (jmknapp @ Oct 28 2005, 02:31 PM)Nontar...   Oct 28 2005, 01:26 PM
|- - jmknapp   QUOTE (ugordan @ Oct 28 2005, 09:26 AM)108000...   Oct 28 2005, 06:32 PM
- - volcanopele   Best image I am aware of: http://saturn.jpl.nasa....   Oct 28 2005, 06:59 PM
- - RPascal   Mosaic North-direction During my last attempts to...   Oct 28 2005, 10:29 PM
|- - volcanopele   QUOTE (RPascal @ Oct 28 2005, 03:29 PM)Mosaic...   Oct 31 2005, 06:00 PM
|- - RPascal   QUOTE (volcanopele @ Oct 31 2005, 07:00 PM)No...   Oct 31 2005, 09:55 PM
|- - tfisher   On his pagehttp://www.beugungsbild.de/huygens/ISS_...   Oct 31 2005, 11:40 PM
- - scalbers   Interesting that the azimuth answer may have been ...   Oct 29 2005, 04:06 PM
|- - RPascal   QUOTE (scalbers @ Oct 29 2005, 05:06 PM)I hav...   Oct 29 2005, 07:56 PM
- - Decepticon   I wonder if everything is OK?   Oct 30 2005, 11:50 PM
- - Toma B   QUOTE (Decepticon @ Oct 31 2005, 02:50 AM)I w...   Oct 31 2005, 07:10 AM
|- - elakdawalla   QUOTE (Toma B @ Oct 31 2005, 12:10 AM)I'm...   Oct 31 2005, 04:19 PM
|- - The Messenger   QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Oct 31 2005, 09:19 AM)Pa...   Oct 31 2005, 06:04 PM
- - volcanopele   Everything is fine.   Oct 31 2005, 05:16 PM
- - Sunspot   http://ciclops.org/view_event.php?id=41 Some RAW ...   Oct 31 2005, 07:10 PM
|- - tfisher   QUOTE (Sunspot @ Oct 31 2005, 03:10 PM)http:/...   Oct 31 2005, 08:37 PM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (tfisher @ Oct 31 2005, 01:37 PM)The on...   Oct 31 2005, 11:52 PM
|- - volcanopele   QUOTE (JRehling @ Oct 31 2005, 04:52 PM)Voyag...   Nov 1 2005, 12:19 AM
|- - ljk4-1   QUOTE (JRehling @ Oct 31 2005, 06:52 PM)This ...   Nov 4 2005, 04:24 PM
- - volcanopele   That is MT3   Oct 31 2005, 09:05 PM
- - volcanopele   Yes, but their resolution in that frame (7 km/pixe...   Nov 1 2005, 12:18 AM
- - tfisher   Here's a false color view of Titan's surfa...   Nov 4 2005, 07:13 AM
|- - tfisher   I worked a bit harder to balance the curves for th...   Nov 4 2005, 08:21 AM
|- - tfisher   QUOTE (tfisher @ Nov 4 2005, 04:21 AM)I love ...   Nov 4 2005, 01:37 PM
|- - tedstryk   This is some great stuff! It will be interest...   Nov 4 2005, 03:25 PM
- - Decepticon   I'll take it a grain of salt and 2 shots of wh...   Nov 4 2005, 02:11 PM
- - tfisher   Okay, one final attempt for me. This time I stack...   Nov 4 2005, 05:35 PM
|- - jmknapp   QUOTE (tfisher @ Nov 4 2005, 01:35 PM)Okay, o...   Nov 4 2005, 10:57 PM
|- - tfisher   QUOTE (jmknapp @ Nov 4 2005, 06:57 PM)Out of ...   Nov 5 2005, 05:36 PM
- - Decepticon   "Naming New Lands" New CICLOPS Update. ...   Nov 4 2005, 11:18 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 08:37 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.