My Assistant
Haskin Ridge, The Eastern Route Down to the Basin |
Oct 6 2005, 05:59 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 252 Joined: 5-May 05 From: Mississippi (USA) Member No.: 379 |
Now that we know where we are going, I thought we could use a topic about our future route. I hope that a few images will get the rover rolling - downhill.
BACKGROUND ------ From Steve Squyres Misson Update Octoberber 4, 2005 Extending eastward from the summit of Husband Hill is a broad ridge that we've named Haskin Ridge. It trends ENE from the summit, does a little dog-leg to the right, and then trends ESE for a bit. Right at the dog-leg there's a pretty steep step, which we're not certain we can get down. So we're going to descend the upper portion of the ridge, right to where the step is, and assess the situation. If we can see a safe route, then we'll continue down onto the lower portion of Haskin Ridge. ------ My Image of Haskin Ridge I tried to get the best image of Haskin ridge that was available, and this is a crop from a true color TIFF summit panorama, located on the the Cornell Pancam web site. I converted the tif file to a gif file to save some download time. Warning : File Size : 1.7 MB Cornell True Color Pan of Haskin Ridge Reference WEB page of Husband Hill Summit Panorama Warning: File Size : 80 MB !!!! Preliminary Spirit Pancam of "Husband Hill Summit" Panorama Jack PS If you can't see the "steep step" that Squyres mentions - try this orbital image. I believe that the "steep step" is the dark shadow cutting across the ridge that is located directly under the word CRATER. I think that it is also visible in the true color pancam image, but it is less obvious. Orbital View of Husband Hill and Basin |
|
|
|
![]() |
Oct 20 2005, 03:44 AM
Post
#76
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 136 Joined: 13-October 05 From: Malibu, CA Member No.: 527 |
QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Oct 19 2005, 08:03 PM) ... we could easily come across long outcrops running along the side of the hill which could be very tricky obstacle ... True, true... as you say, we just have to go along for the ride and see... The immediate question we face (the 'steep step') won't be the only one coming up in this descent - from what I can see there's going to be several dicey points on the way to Home Plate. With a little luck, we can hopefully avoid the need to reverse our path! Wouldn't that be the pits! Have a great one... Ron |
|
|
|
Oct 20 2005, 05:53 AM
Post
#77
|
||
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2262 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Melbourne - Oz Member No.: 16 |
No better than the navcams really but attached is a screen grab of the Sol 637 drive direction Pancam thumbnails at Pancam data tracking.
Would make a nice pan of where we're headed if the full versions would turn up A Sol 638 version is also down but thumbnails are not showing up yet. 638 p2388.06 12 0 0 12 1 25 pancam_drv_dir_L7R1 James - Addict, hoping I won't have to keep reloading Exploratorium every five mins for much longer. -------------------- |
|
|
|
||
Oct 20 2005, 06:06 AM
Post
#78
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2262 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Melbourne - Oz Member No.: 16 |
QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Oct 20 2005, 03:53 PM) And with that - it's back! http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/spirit/fo...00P1214L0M1.JPG -------------------- |
|
|
|
Oct 20 2005, 06:38 AM
Post
#79
|
||
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2262 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Melbourne - Oz Member No.: 16 |
I don't know If you'll be able to see this better in stereo images (I don't have glasses) but using the parallax calculator It appears that there are no features between 30 and 80 meters in the dead ahead direction.
i.e in this image, Terrain below the added line is closer than 30m above, further than 80m! 50 steep, unknown meters. -------------------- |
|
|
|
||
Oct 20 2005, 07:07 AM
Post
#80
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2262 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Melbourne - Oz Member No.: 16 |
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Oct 20 2005, 08:10 AM
Post
#81
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 4280 Joined: 19-April 05 From: .br at .es Member No.: 253 |
QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Oct 20 2005, 07:53 AM) No better than the navcams really but attached is a screen grab of the Sol 637 drive direction Pancam thumbnails at Pancam data tracking. Wait a minute, James! Did you get those pictures directly from the pancam tracking web? How? Edit: Sometime ago I was playing with that "display_jpeg" button on the webpage with no results. Any trick? |
|
|
|
Oct 20 2005, 11:46 AM
Post
#82
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2895 Joined: 22-April 05 From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands Member No.: 353 |
|
|
|
|
Oct 20 2005, 11:53 AM
Post
#83
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2895 Joined: 22-April 05 From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands Member No.: 353 |
|
|
|
|
Oct 20 2005, 11:55 AM
Post
#84
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2895 Joined: 22-April 05 From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands Member No.: 353 |
|
|
|
|
Oct 20 2005, 11:58 AM
Post
#85
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2895 Joined: 22-April 05 From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands Member No.: 353 |
|
|
|
|
Oct 20 2005, 12:35 PM
Post
#86
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2895 Joined: 22-April 05 From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands Member No.: 353 |
|
|
|
|
Oct 20 2005, 12:39 PM
Post
#87
|
|||
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 4280 Joined: 19-April 05 From: .br at .es Member No.: 253 |
QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Oct 20 2005, 08:38 AM) I don't know If you'll be able to see this better in stereo images (I don't have glasses) but using the parallax calculator It appears that there are no features between 30 and 80 meters in the dead ahead direction. i.e in this image, Terrain below the added line is closer than 30m above, further than 80m! 50 steep, unknown meters. Right. But if you have a look to the pancam picture left of the one you mentioned (2P183010735EFFAH00P2388L7M1, see below) there IS a path i.e. continuity which avoids the step. In two days (drives) Spirit may reach that point. |
||
|
|
|||
Oct 20 2005, 12:42 PM
Post
#88
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2895 Joined: 22-April 05 From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands Member No.: 353 |
|
|
|
|
Oct 20 2005, 12:55 PM
Post
#89
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 4280 Joined: 19-April 05 From: .br at .es Member No.: 253 |
Nice pano Jvandriel!
Let me use it to extend on my last comment, if you don't mind. That's the pancam panorama taken after sol 638 drive. The step can be seen on the three rightmost frames, while the path I painted before can be seen a bit to the left of the center. |
|
|
|
Oct 20 2005, 01:06 PM
Post
#90
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2895 Joined: 22-April 05 From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands Member No.: 353 |
Tesheiner,
I think you are right. The only place where Spirit can cross that step is where you painted the route and a little bit more to the right. jvandriel |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 12:35 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|