IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

A Potential Major Discovery, bye bye nonbaryonic dark matter hello GR
deglr6328
post Oct 10 2005, 09:08 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 356
Joined: 12-March 05
Member No.: 190



Fred Cooperstock and Steven Tieu of Northeastern University and the University of Victoria respectively have a paper on arXiv which apparently shows that using general relativity with corrections for non-linear effects and other such things I do not understand results in a VERY good fit for the explanation of why galaxies rotate the way they do and thus removes any need for non-baryonic "dark matter" haloes around the galaxy! If it is a valid result and is verified it will be a really major discovery. Even CERN is now carrying a blurb about the paper.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Guest_Myran_*
post Oct 11 2005, 04:28 PM
Post #2





Guests






'Dark energy' are a term sometime used for the cosmological constant, one idea proposed by Albert Einstein and which have had a renaissance in recent years. The idea of the cosmological constant had a comeback after astronomers measured the light from novas used as 'standard candles' to get distance and the velocity (redshift) for the galaxies they were part of.
The study (actually more than one) yielded the result that the galaxies in the universe appeared to increase their speed as the universe continues to expand, and one theory are that this was caused by 'dark energy' the term meaning that its unseen.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blobrana
post Oct 11 2005, 05:44 PM
Post #3


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 45
Joined: 8-August 05
Member No.: 457



The word on the street says that:
The theory fails when modelling the galactic rotation speeds of dwarf galaxies.
The theory fails to agree with observations near the galactic centre.
The theory derives the galactic density from the rotation curves- they should be doing it the other way around.
The small number of bright galaxies they chose have high inclination angles.
The theory fails to address why galaxy clusters are held together.

Singular disk of matter in the Cooperstock and Tieu galaxy model
Authors: Mikolaj Korzynski

Recently a new model of galactic gravitational field, based on ordinary General Relativity, has been proposed by Cooperstock and Tieu in which no exotic dark matter is needed to fit the observed rotation curve to a reasonable ordinary matter distribution. We argue that in this model the gravitational field is generated not only by the galaxy matter, but by a thin, singular disk as well.
The model should therefore be considered unphysical.

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0508/0508377.pdf (PDF)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- deglr6328   A Potential Major Discovery   Oct 10 2005, 09:08 PM
- - Sunspot   Article at space.com too: http://www.space.com/sc...   Oct 10 2005, 10:58 PM
|- - dilo   QUOTE (Sunspot @ Oct 10 2005, 10:58 PM)Articl...   Oct 11 2005, 04:37 AM
- - Richard Trigaux   hmmmmm.... interesting. This would ultimately e...   Oct 11 2005, 09:06 AM
- - Myran   'Dark energy' are a term sometime used for...   Oct 11 2005, 04:28 PM
- - blobrana   The word on the street says that: The theory fails...   Oct 11 2005, 05:44 PM
- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (blobrana @ Oct 11 2005, 05:44 PM)Recen...   Oct 11 2005, 06:08 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 09:06 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.