IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

11 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 10 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Dione Image Products
jasedm
post May 21 2008, 05:39 PM
Post #106


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 489
Joined: 22-January 06
Member No.: 655



Very noticeable that the feature previously known as Cassandra (~245deg West 42 deg South) doesn't show up too well on the new map. It was exceptionally prominent in distant Voyager images because of the albedo differential (and was assumed to be a ray crater)
The name Cassandra has now been used for a nearby crater by the IAU as the 'rays' with Cassini's better vision appear to be a series of tectonic features radiating from a central source.

Great to be party to the mapping of new worlds
smile.gif

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post May 22 2008, 02:23 PM
Post #107


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4061
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



This is some very interesting work. The first, third, and fifth pages are the most interesting:

http://www.dlr.de/en/desktopdefault.aspx/t...ry-1/51_read-1/
http://www.dlr.de/en/desktopdefault.aspx/t...ry-1/51_read-2/
http://www.dlr.de/en/desktopdefault.aspx/t...ry-1/51_read-3/
http://www.dlr.de/en/desktopdefault.aspx/t...ry-1/51_read-4/
http://www.dlr.de/en/desktopdefault.aspx/t...ry-1/51_read-5/


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Mar 19 2009, 08:23 PM
Post #108


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3538
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



I've recently been playing around with the September 30th 2007 flyby PDS data. Here's the inbound 2-frame mosaic, IR1/GRN/UV3 stretched, low-res color overlaid on full frame clear images:



Here's one of the highest resolution footprints in enhanced (boosted saturation and UV channel) IR1/GRN/UV3 color, taken from 47 000 km:


Notice the small, yellowish craters. There's material for a high resolution color mosaic, but there might be several data dropouts. I didn't even attempt it due to substantial viewing geometry change. I did do the outbound global mosaic, 7 NAC frames also in IR1/GRN/UV3 color, about 90 000 km distance:




Lastly, here's a quick-n-dirty enhancement of the splat subtly visible in even more distant imagery:

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jasedm
post Mar 19 2009, 08:31 PM
Post #109


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 489
Joined: 22-January 06
Member No.: 655



Fabulous work! - I particularly like the crescent view.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Mar 19 2009, 09:09 PM
Post #110


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4061
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (ugordan @ Mar 19 2009, 08:23 PM) *
Lastly, here's a quick-n-dirty enhancement of the splat subtly visible in even more distant imagery:

Attached Image

Wow, that crater left quite a splat! Great work, Ugordan!


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Mar 19 2009, 10:05 PM
Post #111


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3538
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Here's the raw image merge from this post using calibrated data for comparison:

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Mar 19 2009, 11:38 PM
Post #112


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4061
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



By "raw" do you mean true raw images or the "raw" jpegs?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Mar 20 2009, 12:23 AM
Post #113


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3119
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (tedstryk @ Mar 19 2009, 03:09 PM) *
Wow, that crater left quite a splat! Great work, Ugordan!

Seconded! That splat is quite remarkable. Makes you wonder whether a darker, redder body impacted Dione, or an impactor exhumed a darker, redder layer out from under the bland icy crust.

Doesn't look like a deeper or fresher crater than others which left no splat, so I'm leaning towards the former.

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Mar 20 2009, 12:37 AM
Post #114


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4583
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



No, that's not the real color.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Mar 20 2009, 08:37 AM
Post #115


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3538
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (tedstryk @ Mar 20 2009, 12:38 AM) *
By "raw" do you mean true raw images or the "raw" jpegs?

I was referring to the raw (as in JPEG) merge from that post, only done with PDS data this time.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Mar 20 2009, 08:41 AM
Post #116


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3538
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (dvandorn @ Mar 20 2009, 01:23 AM) *
Makes you wonder whether a darker, redder body impacted Dione, or an impactor exhumed a darker, redder layer out from under the bland icy crust.

Phil is right, that's not the actual color, it's an enhancement to show the outlines of the splat. The ejecta blanket is subtly yellowish in stretched colors - similar to the high res shot showing a small crater inside. In natural color it's effectively unnoticeable.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Mar 23 2009, 03:20 PM
Post #117


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1153
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



Amazing work. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
scalbers
post Jul 3 2009, 05:58 PM
Post #118


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 741
Joined: 5-March 05
From: Boulder, CO
Member No.: 184



Anything coming up for the non-targeted flyby on July 11? Looks about 87000km distance on dmuller's Cassini timeline.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jasedm
post Jul 3 2009, 06:28 PM
Post #119


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 489
Joined: 22-January 06
Member No.: 655



Hi Steve,
Having checked out the Ciclops 'looking ahead' article for the next revolution, it appears there are no plans to image Dione on this pass. A shame, as I think some N. polar territory which has been poorly imaged hitherto would have been in view at Voyager-class distances (see SSS simulation below).

Obviously equinox studies are rightly taking precedence for the next month or so at or around periapse.

Dione will have a handful of very good passes in the XXM (if approved) so that's yet another thing to look forward to on this mission.

Jase




Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jasedm
post Jul 15 2009, 01:04 PM
Post #120


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 489
Joined: 22-January 06
Member No.: 655



I spoke too soon, and reckoned without the ingenuity of the image-sequencing people....
They nabbed an opnav-range image of Dione which reveals some more detail in the N. polar region.

Range 427,997 taken on 11th July, slightly enhanced and cropped and rotated to match the solar system simulator view alongside.



Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

11 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 10 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th June 2013 - 05:33 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.