IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Opportunity At Erebus, MOC cPROTO image
SigurRosFan
post Oct 24 2005, 12:57 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 531
Joined: 24-August 05
Member No.: 471



http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2005/10/24/

cPROTO Oppy:


--------------------
- blue_scape / Nico -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Guest_Edward Schmitz_*
post Oct 29 2005, 10:13 PM
Post #2





Guests






The ground truth that we have from the rovers tells us that the dunes are evolving too slowly to see any motion from orbit. At best (with current res), we would have to wait upwards of a century to see anything. Probably longer...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Oct 30 2005, 03:10 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (Edward Schmitz @ Oct 29 2005, 05:13 PM)
The ground truth that we have from the rovers tells us that the dunes are evolving too slowly to see any motion from orbit.  At best (with current res), we would have to wait upwards of a century to see anything.  Probably longer...
*

I disagree. The ground truth shows that disturbed martian soil at Meridiani (as in disturbed by the MER tracks) starts blowing around after only a day or two. And it shows that the drift surfaces are not cemented.

The only thing that keeps the drifts from changing dramatically from day to day is an equilibrium that has evolved between the grain sizes and the winds' transport capacities. Change that equilibrium (for example, by adding a few tons of dust per square kilometer, say in a dust storm), and I'd bet the drifts will evolve much faster and more noticeably.

Of course, if this dust storm kills Oppy, it'll be sort of hard to show how the greater levels of deposition will affect the drifts...

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcel
post Oct 31 2005, 02:03 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 290
Joined: 26-March 04
From: Edam, The Netherlands
Member No.: 65



QUOTE (dvandorn @ Oct 30 2005, 03:10 PM)
The only thing that keeps the drifts from changing dramatically from day to day is an equilibrium that has evolved between the grain sizes and the winds' transport capacities. 
-the other Doug
*


Exactly. BUT: why should adding some dust to the surface change this ? The dunes are the dunes and adding more dust cannot alter the original dunes underneath that easy. The dust can accumulate on them, but it will be blown away more easy than the material of the dunes itself. Just like the only transportation of material we actually saw happening was the change in oppy's tracks. But this was in an unnatural (non Mars induced) circumstance: by crunching the topsoil that is "stripped" from its "finest fines" by eons of wind, fines from underneath are liberated and go there way immediately. To my point of view, that's what we saw happening within day's, but that's about it. We did not see ANY movement, not even with MI, considering the untouched surface.

I think these dunes are altered and formed in highly rare happenings of major windspeeds. And i think it took an unbelievable long time to form.

Besides: there's not a single reason why observations from orbit could add new insights about these processes....because not even Oppy sees it moving from a million times closer than any orbiter......
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 01:51 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.