IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

A Note From Don Brownlee On "stardust"
Guest_BruceMoomaw_*
post Oct 27 2005, 07:29 AM
Post #1





Guests






Don Brownlee's response yesterday to two questions on Stardust:

Moomaw: "I see that NASA, in its next Discovery proposal, is going to allow proposals for extended missions for both Deep Impact and Stardust in the "Missions of Opportunity" category. A few years ago, you told me that it was extremely unlikely that it would be possible to use Stardust's coming Earth flyby to retarget it to any future comet or asteroid flybys simply because it will be almost out of maneuvering fuel. Have you since identified any possible targets for such a flyby?

"Also, regarding the peculiar craters on Wild 2: is a consensus being reached that they are indeed sublimation pits rather than impact craters -- and is it possible that the craters on Tempel 1 might also be sublimation pits, despite their more rounded slope profiles?"
__________________________

Brownlee: "We could have done another comet flyby, but this would have involved trajectory changes before the Earth return. This is a risk to our main mission and a risk that we chose not to take. It is likely that Stardust will pass near an asteroid in the near future, but we have not looked into this in any detail. The orbit will be smaller after the flyby and I am not sure how far it will go into the asteroid belt.

"The great depressions on Wild 2 are a real mystery because nothing like them was seen on any of the other 3 comets that have been imaged. The presence of normal-looking impact craters seen by Deep Impact indicates that old comet surfaces do retain normal looking impact craters. The features on Wild 2 might be ablation-modified craters or just odd craters, but absence on the other comets argues against this. Temple 1 clearly has a very old cratered surface; and in contrast, my belief is that Wild 2 has a young heavily modified surface. Why it would look so different from Halley, a very active and presumably highly altered surface, is unknown.

"It is possible that Wild 2 had an earlier history closer to the Sun that created these features. It is also possible that comets are just a diverse bunch."
_______________________

Now, since the only asteroid-relevant instrument Stardust will have left after the flyby is a camera -- and one without a working color filter wheel -- it is seriously doubtful whether a simple photographic flyby of one near-Earth asteroid would be worth even the relatively small sum for an extended mission. Still, you never know for certain.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th December 2024 - 07:47 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.