IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

I'm Off To The Complex Meeting...
Guest_BruceMoomaw_*
post Oct 29 2005, 12:24 PM
Post #1





Guests






...that is, the Nov. 2-4 meeting of the National Academy of Sciences' Committee on Lunar and Planetary Exploration which advises NASA on mission selection, to do a print article on it for "Astronomy" magazine.

The meeting's agenda is at http://www4.nas.edu/webcr.nsf/MeetingDispl...-D?OpenDocument ; it looks extremely interesting. Anyone have anything they'd especially like me to ask about while I'm there?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
djellison
post Oct 30 2005, 10:09 AM
Post #2


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



I think they should be some discussion of the Falcon lauch vehicle. IF...IF it works, it would undercut the EELV's by a factor of 4. Are they being considered a serious prospect for future beyond-leo-missions if found to be a reliable platform. What impact might this have for Lo-Mart and Boeing.

Phoenix, MSL and MRO outreach efforts. Are they intending to exercise a similar system to that of MER, and with MRO, is the infrastructure in place to allow the promised online access to images very rapidly - what sort of turn-around-time will be expected for MRO images to get online?

Any end-of-life-predictions for MGS, MODY and MEX w.r.t. acting as a backup relay for MSL. I think the loss of MTO as you say Bruce - WILL impact MSL -without doubt. Some of the largest data products such as HDTV res des-movie, 5fps movies on the ground etc, will surely be lost.

Comments on the demo-transition of MER-A to UHF operations only - does this impact planning in any way? Are there savings to be had w.r.t. DSN requirements by doing this?

Has the recent JPL lay-offs impacted MSL development in any way?

To be honest, you're a harsh bastard, so I cant think of anything scathing that I know you wont have thought of already smile.gif

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Oct 30 2005, 06:44 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2558
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 30 2005, 02:09 AM)
Phoenix, MSL and MRO outreach efforts. Are they intending to exercise a similar system to that of MER, and with MRO, is the infrastructure in place to allow the promised online access to images very rapidly - what sort of turn-around-time will be expected for MRO images to get online?

*


You might be interested to read what I believe is the current data release policy for the Mars Exploration Program:

http://pds-geosciences.wustl.edu/missions/mep/mepdmp.pdf

It specifies a six-month data validation period, encourages but does not require more timely release, but does require that "each Principal Investigator will also release a significant subset of data earlier as a form of public outreach and education. These releases will typically be available within a week of data receipt."

Actually implementing this is the responsibility of the individual instrument team.
I don't know the specifics of any of the MRO teams' plans, and it's too early to say for MSL.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- BruceMoomaw   I'm Off To The Complex Meeting...   Oct 29 2005, 12:24 PM
- - Redstone   Bruce, I can't pass up this opportunity! ...   Oct 29 2005, 04:11 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   Good questions, and I'll try to include all of...   Oct 30 2005, 12:53 AM
- - djellison   I think they should be some discussion of the Falc...   Oct 30 2005, 10:09 AM
|- - mcaplinger   QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 30 2005, 02:09 AM)I th...   Oct 30 2005, 04:14 PM
|- - mcaplinger   QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 30 2005, 02:09 AM)Phoe...   Oct 30 2005, 06:44 PM
|- - volcanopele   QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Oct 30 2005, 11:44 AM)Act...   Nov 2 2005, 06:26 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Oct 30 2005, 04:14 PM)It...   Oct 31 2005, 01:30 AM
- - djellison   Hi MC, I appreciate your comments, and it's go...   Oct 31 2005, 08:07 AM
|- - mcaplinger   QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 31 2005, 12:07 AM)The ...   Oct 31 2005, 02:55 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   Yes, that's a point -- could such a less ambit...   Oct 31 2005, 09:05 AM
- - djellison   I'm trying to think what it might be able to d...   Oct 31 2005, 09:19 AM
- - Redstone   One more question, Bruce. If I understand this rig...   Oct 31 2005, 02:06 PM
- - djellison   So it raises the question - why was MTO proposed i...   Oct 31 2005, 03:21 PM
|- - mcaplinger   QUOTE (djellison @ Oct 31 2005, 07:21 AM)why ...   Oct 31 2005, 04:28 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   Its main benefit probably would have been in enabl...   Oct 31 2005, 11:09 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   I'm back, and I do have news. I'd tell it...   Nov 5 2005, 08:36 AM
|- - The Messenger   QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Nov 5 2005, 01:36 AM)Mea...   Nov 7 2005, 09:21 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   I'd already gotten the explanation for the ...   Nov 8 2005, 02:04 AM
|- - The Messenger   QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Nov 7 2005, 07:04 PM)I...   Nov 9 2005, 06:14 AM
- - remcook   bruce, any idea in what timeframe the huygens iss...   Nov 9 2005, 10:16 AM
|- - volcanopele   QUOTE (remcook @ Nov 9 2005, 03:16 AM)bruce, ...   Nov 15 2005, 10:01 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   Damned if I know. I'm getting pretty frustrat...   Nov 9 2005, 10:44 AM
- - Redstone   Bruce, how long until the Astronomy article shows ...   Nov 10 2005, 03:18 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   I don't think the "Astronomy" articl...   Nov 10 2005, 08:11 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 09:04 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.