My Assistant
Low-light-level Imaging: Rings, Nightsides, Etc., Low light observations: Saturn System |
Nov 4 2005, 11:59 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1870 Joined: 20-February 05 Member No.: 174 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Nov 4 2005, 02:46 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Solar System Cartographer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10265 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
edstrick, your 'something' is Janus.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2005, 10:51 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1870 Joined: 20-February 05 Member No.: 174 |
Phil: Thanks. I didn't go back and check.
Here's 3 more from the F-ring "movie" #42291 is also one of the inner "potatos" in front of the rings. In both of these shots, this and #42321, the part of the moon's nightside that is not illuminated by a crescent Saturn is darker then the background. There clearly is a "glow" behind these moons that is not scattered light from the F-Ring in the camera, but is an extended halo of the rings that I'm not sure has been this clearly seen before. (There was one crescent ?Thethys? series some months back that also had a bright background glow behind the moon.) Note you can also see the G-Ring. #42273, 42269, and 42312 all have crescent moons behind the rings, with most of the nightsides illuminated by Saturn shine. Finally, in a recent series of "E-Ring" wide angle images, W00012012 is maybe the best example, what I expect is Enceladus appears to have a bright fringe on the nightside silhoueted against the E-ring glow that I'm inclined to think is not jpg artifact. All the images in this sequence that are well enough exposed to show the brightness difference between the nightside and the E-ring without wiping out the nightside show it. It looks real, but the horrible compression artifacts in these 512 x 512 wide angle images leave me mentally flipping back and forth. |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2005, 10:56 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1870 Joined: 20-February 05 Member No.: 174 |
Oh.. also. In the well exposed images in this series, the midplane of the E-ring appears DARKER then the ring just above and below the midplane. Beyond this bright zone of the E-ring that I presume is at Enceladus' orbit, the ring brightness descreases, but this dark centerline disappears faster than the ring fades. To the left, towards Saturn, the ring brightness drops somewhat, it doesn't widen, so we're nearly in the ring plane..... and the faint dark band pretty much disappears!
"Go Figure!" |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2005, 02:51 PM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2492 Joined: 15-January 05 From: center Italy Member No.: 150 |
Stunning images, apart the "quantization" artifact... so I worked on them to have smoother realistic gradients.
-------------------- I always think before posting! - Marco -
|
|
|
|
Nov 6 2005, 04:32 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 178 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 498 |
Is that the ring's atmosphere that we can see giving a wedge of light or is it an imaging artifact?
|
|
|
|
Nov 6 2005, 07:52 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1870 Joined: 20-February 05 Member No.: 174 |
I presume it's not a gas atmosphere, but rather micrometer or smaller sized dust, down in the size range where it can be electrically charged by radiation or photoelectric effect, then moved out of the ring plane by magnetic field effects. That's what I believe is1 the explanation of the diffuse halo around Jupiter's rings.
And, Dilo, that did nicely improve the cosmetics of the images without blurring detail in the more adequately exposed parts. Nice. |
|
|
|
Nov 6 2005, 07:58 AM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2492 Joined: 15-January 05 From: center Italy Member No.: 150 |
QUOTE (edstrick @ Nov 6 2005, 07:52 AM) , Dilo, that did nicely improve the cosmetics of the images without blurring detail in the more adequately exposed parts. Nice. This is exactly what I tried to do... thanks! -------------------- I always think before posting! - Marco -
|
|
|
|
Nov 10 2005, 02:54 AM
Post
#9
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2492 Joined: 15-January 05 From: center Italy Member No.: 150 |
Another enhanced view (from last published raw img); here rings are almost edge-on and their inclination/position seems a little bit "odd"....
-------------------- I always think before posting! - Marco -
|
|
|
|
Nov 11 2005, 12:40 AM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2262 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Melbourne - Oz Member No.: 16 |
QUOTE (dilo @ Nov 10 2005, 01:54 PM) Another enhanced view (from last published raw img); here rings are almost edge-on and their inclination/position seems a little bit "odd".... That's a great image dilo, unusual geometry, thanks. I love the ring-shine onto Saturns night side James -------------------- |
|
|
|
Nov 11 2005, 08:02 AM
Post
#11
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
QUOTE (edstrick @ Nov 6 2005, 09:52 AM) I presume it's not a gas atmosphere, but rather micrometer or smaller sized dust, down in the size range where it can be electrically charged by radiation or photoelectric effect, then moved out of the ring plane by magnetic field effects. Personally, I don't think the halo around the rings (main rings at least) is real, it's more likely scattered light in the camera optics. If you take any NAC image of a bright or well-exposed target and stretch the contrast, you'll notice the same ghostly halo. It's either perfectly normal or as if there's still some haze left on the NAC optics that hadn't been removed. I've seen the same halo even around Jupiter images taken before the haze anomaly so I take it the most probable reason is the light bouncing off the CCD back onto the shutters/filters/support structures and back again to the detector, though this is probably a low order effect. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Nov 11 2005, 10:06 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1870 Joined: 20-February 05 Member No.: 174 |
Ugordan:
I know all about the scattered light problems. It definately doesn't help. but you can see the nightside of Janus and the other small moon <Epimetheus? Prometheus?> in silhouette against the glow as *darker* than the background. That portion of any glow MUST be behind the moon, not in the camera. |
|
|
|
Nov 11 2005, 10:48 AM
Post
#13
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
QUOTE (edstrick @ Nov 11 2005, 12:06 PM) Ugordan: I know all about the scattered light problems. It definately doesn't help. but you can see the nightside of Janus and the other small moon <Epimetheus? Prometheus?> in silhouette against the glow as *darker* than the background. That portion of any glow MUST be behind the moon, not in the camera. I can see your point. There certainly seems to be material behind the small moons, but do note that they're visually near the F ring which is not very narrowly contained, I don't know if the G ring is inside their orbit OTOH so that could also be a factor. However, I believe the majority of the glow is due to scattered light, it would be much more favorable if Cassini was almost aligned with the ring plane, cutting scattered light to a minimum. That would certainly make a more convincing case. In the two images of the small moons it's clearly visible that the glow appears to be at its thickest around the main rings and not spread along the width of the scene as one would expect if the material was outside the main rings (F,G rings), but still in the ring plane. THAT part of the glow I believe is optical artifact and not real and it could be misinterpreted as a sign of significant amounts of material above and below the main rings. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Nov 11 2005, 10:59 AM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 147 Joined: 30-June 05 From: Bristol, UK Member No.: 423 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 11 2005, 11:39 AM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1870 Joined: 20-February 05 Member No.: 174 |
And you can see the G-Ring just above and partially behind the moon.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 09:44 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|