My Assistant
China Announces Manned Lunar Mission In 2017 |
Nov 5 2005, 04:41 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 123 Joined: 21-February 05 Member No.: 175 |
Several published reports today finally disclosed China’s much anticipated long-term human spaceflight aspirations. Audacious would be an understatement:
EVA in the next few years A space station by 2010 Robotic exploration of the Moon Human landing on the Moon by 2017 Helium-3 mining on the Moon Observatories on the Moon Bold? Yes. Difficult? Very. Expensive? Without a doubt. Crazy? Maybe. Overambitious? Maybe. A ruse? Maybe. Possible? Yes. If the national will to do so exists in the long-term. Likely? Who really knows? Very symbolically, the day before, the NASA administrator spoke before the relevant congressional subcommittee and told them flat-out that NASA simply does not have nearly enough money to carry out its mandate. They cannot fly the shuttle in any quantity, finish the ISS in whatever form, or get to the moon at all, with the monies currently available. Whether that needed extra money will ever come is still a very open question. Political support for human spaceflight in the United States is currently lukewarm at best, and outright hostile at worst. Essentially, if the United States as a nation and society does not recommit itself to human space exploration in the very near future, it will falter and possibly disappear from the endeavor over the next decade. This is not my prediction, but the prediction of many experts in the US. Although predicting the future is foggy at the best of times, the general trend lines here are unmistakable: China is aiming to be a dominant, if not the dominant, player in human spaceflight. It may take time - but they will get there sooner or later. The United States on the other hand seems uncertain, or possibly unwilling, to remain a major player. It is currently in unmistakable decline, in spite of still being the current dominant space power. In 1985, the United States successfully flew 9 Space Shuttle missions in that year alone, including two just two weeks apart. Today, even if all the current shuttle technical problems did not exist, the US could not under any circumstances even come close to matching that ability. It is simply not physically able to do so any more, the institution has been allowed to atrophy and whither. It is in a state of not only negative growth, but negative development. If left on their current trends, those trend lines will meet and cross at some point in the future. The paradigm will have changed, probably permanently. When they will cross is open to debate, but the larger issue is the fact that if left unchecked, the trend lines will cross. Does America have what it takes to reverse the trend? Does America care to? Will it become to human spaceflight what Portugal became to exploring the Americas 500 years ago? Or will it come back from its current state of decline? Will we have to learn Mandarin to really get the most out of the next lunar landing by humans? |
|
|
|
GregM China Announces Manned Lunar Mission In 2017 Nov 5 2005, 04:41 AM
Waspie_Dwarf 2017 is a very optomistic target. The Chinese gove... Nov 6 2005, 04:45 AM
Steve G [quote= Un-needed quote removed
[/quote]
Shenzho... Dec 31 2005, 08:59 PM
GravityWaves QUOTE (Waspie_Dwarf @ Nov 6 2005, 01:45 A... Apr 11 2006, 06:28 AM
Stephen QUOTE (Waspie_Dwarf @ Nov 6 2005, 04:45 A... Apr 18 2006, 04:27 AM
ljk4-1 QUOTE (Stephen @ Apr 18 2006, 12:27 AM) 2... Apr 18 2006, 01:20 PM
ljk4-1 The latest issue of The Space Review has an articl... Apr 10 2006, 04:24 PM
BruceMoomaw Pfaw. Luo has been asked repeatedly over the past... Apr 11 2006, 07:16 AM
GravityWaves Bruce, I'm not going to get drawn into politic... Apr 11 2006, 08:27 AM
Bob Shaw I'm delighted to say that, in my view, there *... Apr 11 2006, 02:02 PM
Marz I'm confused.
1. Why would another nation... Apr 11 2006, 04:40 PM
PhilHorzempa As for a Chinese manned mission to the Moon, we sh... Apr 11 2006, 08:05 PM
ljk4-1 http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2006-04/...ent_4... Apr 17 2006, 06:43 PM
Bill Harris I'm not wanting to turn this into a geo-politi... Apr 17 2006, 08:11 PM
ljk4-1 QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Apr 17 2006, 04:11 P... Apr 17 2006, 08:28 PM
BruceMoomaw The headline and first paragraph of that Xinhua ne... Apr 17 2006, 10:07 PM
Bob Shaw Bruce is right - half the WWW sites which have pic... Apr 18 2006, 12:54 PM
Phil Stooke "2017 is still more than a decade away. How m... Apr 18 2006, 01:30 PM
Bill Harris From the Project Horizon site:
"Project HORI... Apr 18 2006, 03:27 PM
BruceMoomaw Arthur C. Clarke once noted that -- while the Brit... Apr 18 2006, 10:06 PM
remcook some more on China's plans from the washington... Apr 19 2006, 01:57 PM
BruceMoomaw Ignoring the editorial's absurd conclusion tha... Apr 19 2006, 03:12 PM
BruceMoomaw Here are those two short items in the April 10 Avi... Apr 21 2006, 12:53 PM
ljk4-1 QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Apr 21 2006, 08:53 A... Apr 21 2006, 01:07 PM
ljk4-1 Here are some more details on the radio telescope ... Apr 25 2006, 02:32 PM
ljk4-1 China To Launch Satellites For Lunar Surveying
ht... May 9 2006, 06:55 PM
ljk4-1 China Moon Probe Readied for April 2007 liftoff
... May 18 2006, 05:57 PM
Stephen QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ May 18 2006, 05:57 P... May 19 2006, 06:15 AM
GravityWaves QUOTE (Stephen @ May 19 2006, 03:15 AM) ... Aug 4 2006, 03:48 PM
BruceMoomaw Yes -- and notice how carefully vague he is about ... May 19 2006, 11:35 AM
ljk4-1 Paolo Ulivi has an amazing Web page on Chinese pla... May 19 2006, 03:27 PM
DonPMitchell It's easy to talk the talk. The US and USSR a... May 19 2006, 04:10 PM
dvandorn China made a decision, about 20 years ago, to catc... May 20 2006, 03:59 PM
GravityWaves A top official in China's space program has se... Jul 5 2006, 01:04 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 03:10 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|