IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

A Question On Maximum Resolution Of Visual Images
Mariner9
post Nov 6 2005, 06:49 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 220
Joined: 13-October 05
Member No.: 528



The rule of thumb being bandied about by the project scientists and engineers is that the visual infrared imagary of Titan is degraded by the haze, and the effective resolution is roughly a factor of five higher than the listed "per pixel" value.

So, most of the imagary I've seen so far seems to be effectively above 2-3KM per pixel.

Cassini passes fairly close to Titan, I would think we'd be getting images in the 50-100 meter ranges, but I'm not seeing any images like that.

I'm assuming this has a lot to do with approach geometry and my impression that the best images are taken much closer to areas corresponding to Titan noon, than say Titan 6:00PM. So far the closest approaches were probably closer to the terminator than the center of the dayside, so we're getting much lower resolution. I also imagine that the time-share situtation with the instrument pointing (God I miss the Voyager and Galileo scan platforms) has something to do with this also.

My question is this, later in the tour are we going to get any of the visual imagary at that higher resolution, so we can make out features smaller than the current sets?

And any idea just how high resolution we can hope for?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Guest_BruceMoomaw_*
post Nov 8 2005, 03:02 PM
Post #2





Guests






Well, they don't actually preclude ISS (or the other optical instruments) -- they just mean that those instruments can't make observations during the brief period of closest approach. So far, SAR has been done on four of the eight Titan flybys -- and that 50-50 division is supposed to be maintained during the rest of the mission. However, the science schedule is only worked out for the first ten or so Titan flybys in advance, and there is considerable talk of increasing radar coverage. For instance, one of the passes currently planned for gravity science (which rules out ALL other science observations), would allow either ISS-VIMS coverage of "Lake Ontario" in the south polar region, or radar altimetry of it (which might pick up a specular reflection off any liquid), or SAR mapping of some neighboring regions. It may well be reassigned for one of those goals.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 10:50 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.