IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Gusev From ~100 Meters Up, sol 620-622 Everest raw images-panorama
Nix
post Nov 10 2005, 10:54 PM
Post #1


Chief Assistant
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1409
Joined: 5-January 05
From: Ierapetra, Greece
Member No.: 136



I have recently updated the site with some new mosaics and others to be followed but meanwhile I'm starting to get optimistic about the Everest Panorama. For now I'd like to share the fullres uncorrected panorama as I feel it's interesting in a way, though composed of raw images.


see AwalkonMars home_go 'progress on 360 panoramas'

or directly;

L256 false-color 100%

L2 red channel 50%
L5 green channel 50%
L6 blue channel 50%

Nico


--------------------
photographer, space imagery enthusiast, proud father and partner, and geek.


http://500px.com/sacred-photons &
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
GregM
post Nov 11 2005, 01:57 AM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 123
Joined: 21-February 05
Member No.: 175



.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Nov 14 2005, 01:00 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3652
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (GregM @ Nov 11 2005, 03:57 AM)
I was pretty underwhelmed with the "official" version released recently.
*


Did I understand that they used the L2 instead of L4 filter for the red channel yet again? Why do they insist on using the infrared channel and labeling the final product as true color? I find the official Everest panorama way too red, and that sundial pink chip definitely doesn't add credibility to their "true color" statements. huh.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Nov 14 2005, 01:12 PM
Post #4


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (ugordan @ Nov 14 2005, 01:00 PM)
Why do they insist on using the infrared channel


Because it give a lot more spectral variation to the scene - you get SO much more information from an L2 image than an L4 image. L4 images look very flat, with little of high contrast.


QUOTE (ugordan @ Nov 14 2005, 01:00 PM)
and labeling the final product as true color? I find the official Everest panorama way too red, and that sundial pink chip definitely doesn't add credibility to their "true color" statements.  huh.gif
*


They've not said true colour. They've said APPROXIMATELY true colour. You can 'emulate' an L4-like filter using L2 and L5. Infact Bjorn has done the maths to do just that, and the two are very very very similar indeed. The end resulting mosaic is very little different - if at all - than if it had been taken with L456 instead of L256 - but in taking the L2 channel, they get a lot more information, and a better 3D terrain mesh as there are more feature to co-register between frames.

QUOTE (JPL website)
This panorama spans 360 degrees and consists of images obtained during 81 individual pointings of the panoramic camera. Four filters were used at each pointing. Images through three of the filters, for wavelengths of 750 nanometers, 530 nanometers and 430 nanometers, were combined for this approximately true-color rendering.


QUOTE (Pancam website)
The panorama spans 360 degrees and consists of images obtained in 81 individual pointings and 4 Pancam filters at each pointing. This mosaic is an approximate true color rendering generated using the images acquired through Pancam's 750, 530, and 430 nm filters.


The pink chip is a well documented, well explained result of the near IR response of that colour pigment - it's a specific feature of that chip - http://www.atsnn.com/story/30048.html explains it very well indeed.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Nix   Gusev From ~100 Meters Up   Nov 10 2005, 10:54 PM
- - Reckless   Just downloaded the big one it's great I'm...   Nov 10 2005, 11:50 PM
- - Nix   Thanks! ...back to work for the 'correct...   Nov 10 2005, 11:59 PM
- - GregM   .   Nov 11 2005, 01:57 AM
|- - ugordan   QUOTE (GregM @ Nov 11 2005, 03:57 AM)I was pr...   Nov 14 2005, 01:00 PM
|- - djellison   QUOTE (ugordan @ Nov 14 2005, 01:00 PM)Why do...   Nov 14 2005, 01:12 PM
|- - ugordan   QUOTE (djellison @ Nov 14 2005, 03:12 PM)Beca...   Nov 14 2005, 01:37 PM
- - alan   This is a psychedelic version of the sol 594-7 pan...   Nov 11 2005, 03:07 AM
|- - jamescanvin   Well, without getting involved in another argument...   Nov 11 2005, 03:24 AM
- - Tesheiner   I think we are all looking forward your "corr...   Nov 11 2005, 08:58 AM
- - Nix   I know what you mean. I deselect the sky when matc...   Nov 11 2005, 10:27 AM
- - Tesheiner   Thanks Nico. I have already your sol583-585 panor...   Nov 11 2005, 11:03 AM
- - Nix   three A3's must be nice.. Thing is, I could ma...   Nov 11 2005, 12:52 PM
- - aldo12xu   Hi Nico, just wanted to say your new site looks pr...   Nov 11 2005, 03:54 PM
- - djellison   Actually - it IS what it would look like with huma...   Nov 14 2005, 02:25 PM
|- - ugordan   QUOTE (djellison @ Nov 14 2005, 04:25 PM)Actu...   Nov 14 2005, 03:00 PM
- - maycm   Being a bit of a technical ignoramus when it comes...   Nov 14 2005, 03:22 PM
- - Nix   there. Is it true color? Nope. Is the picture you ...   Nov 14 2005, 03:50 PM
|- - GregM   .   Nov 16 2005, 02:15 AM
|- - tedstryk   I think true-color may be even more relative than ...   Nov 16 2005, 02:22 AM
- - Nix   You're right tedstryk, ad the possiblity that ...   Nov 16 2005, 09:58 AM
- - Bill Harris   QUOTE I think true-color may be even more relative...   Nov 16 2005, 10:24 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 12:48 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.