My Assistant
Oppy Vs Spirit Power Consumption |
Nov 22 2005, 03:05 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 90 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 289 |
From the following "Space" article LINK
QUOTE Spirit’s solar arrays currently produce about 650 watt hours while Opportunity’s generate up to 700 watt hours, Laubach said. A minimum of 300 watt hours is required for Spirit to function, though Opportunity can operate on slightly less, she added. What is the reason for the lower power requirements of Oppy? I thought the two rovers were identical. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Feb 21 2006, 11:46 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Ahh - you're assuming 100% efficiency in the use of petrol.
Typically, an efficient Petrol engine is 30%, Diesel perhaps as much as 40% or more So you'd need not 72 ml/sol, but more like 220 ml/sol Doug |
|
|
|
Feb 21 2006, 11:53 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 362 Joined: 12-June 05 From: Kiama, Australia Member No.: 409 |
Ahh - you're assuming 100% efficiency in the use of petrol. Typically, an efficient Petrol engine is 30%, Diesel perhaps as much as 40% or more So you'd need not 72 ml/sol, but more like 220 ml/sol Doug It was only intended as a comparison. If you use the petrol in a fuel cell you could get 70% eficiency. Maybe petrol was a poor choice, have worked it out for liquid hydrogen and its about 10.5g/day or about 8kg for the entire mission if we assume a fuel cell efficency of 80%. And before you ask, hey it not my fault there is no oxygen on Mars. I only did the calculations to illustrate the small amount of energy that we are dealing with here |
|
|
|
Feb 21 2006, 01:08 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Dublin Correspondent ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 1799 Joined: 28-March 05 From: Celbridge, Ireland Member No.: 220 |
It was only intended as a comparison. If you use the petrol in a fuel cell you could get 70% eficiency. Maybe petrol was a poor choice, have worked it out for liquid hydrogen and its about 10.5g/day or about 8kg for the entire mission if we assume a fuel cell efficency of 80%. And before you ask, hey it not my fault there is no oxygen on Mars. I only did the calculations to illustrate the small amount of energy that we are dealing with here You'll still need an additional 8x the mass of O2 for your fuel cell ~ 370kg in total. I've got a number somewhere that has a specific power for Fuel cells of ~ 0.03kw /kg. So you'd need about 100kg of fuel cell and maybe 100kgor more of cryo storage for the fuel. It would be kind of bulky. If you forget LH2\LO2 and go for C12H26 (Kerosene)\H2O2 as your oxidiser then you'd have a 10:1 oxidiser:fuel mass ratio. All you really needed for MER was a 90day mission so you could have safely budgeted for only 1kg of fuel, 10kg of oxidiser and throw in about 10kg max for a reliable and efficient 140 watt self contained diesel generator. |
|
|
|
Feb 21 2006, 01:36 PM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2488 Joined: 17-April 05 From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK Member No.: 239 |
You'll still need an additional 8x the mass of O2 for your fuel cell ~ 370kg in total. I've got a number somewhere that has a specific power for Fuel cells of ~ 0.03kw /kg. So you'd need about 100kg of fuel cell and maybe 100kgor more of cryo storage for the fuel. It would be kind of bulky. If you forget LH2\LO2 and go for C12H26 (Kerosene)\H2O2 as your oxidiser then you'd have a 10:1 oxidiser:fuel mass ratio. All you really needed for MER was a 90day mission so you could have safely budgeted for only 1kg of fuel, 10kg of oxidiser and throw in about 10kg max for a reliable and efficient 140 watt self contained diesel generator. Ah, of course, that makes more sense - so, for a mission requiring 'bursts' of mechanical energy, might not a hybrid diesel/solar electric vehicle make a lot of sense? Think of it as a winter warmer... ...and I bet you could have a much smaller engine - look at the engines in R/C models, UAVs etc. Bob Shaw -------------------- Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
|
|
|
|
Feb 26 2006, 12:04 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1599 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
Ah, of course, that makes more sense - so, for a mission requiring 'bursts' of mechanical energy, might not a hybrid diesel/solar electric vehicle make a lot of sense? Think of it as a winter warmer... ...and I bet you could have a much smaller engine - look at the engines in R/C models, UAVs etc. How about a solar concentrator powering a stirling engine turning a flywheel? |
|
|
|
Feb 26 2006, 12:29 AM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2488 Joined: 17-April 05 From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK Member No.: 239 |
How about a solar concentrator powering a stirling engine turning a flywheel? Yes, of course - and a hydrocarbon/oxygen engine as previously described has a major efficiency problem in the sense that it produces heat rather than mechanical energy. But what do we need inside a Mars rover, but *heat*? And as for the exhaust gasses, you store 'em. And then you use them to blow your solar concentrator/panels/etc free of dust... The bottom line is that an exclusive approach to power generation actually *reduces* your options rather than expanding your mission! Bob Shaw -------------------- Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
|
|
|
|
maycm Oppy Vs Spirit Power Consumption Nov 22 2005, 03:05 PM
RNeuhaus QUOTE (maycm @ Nov 22 2005, 10:05 AM)From the... Nov 22 2005, 03:15 PM
helvick QUOTE (maycm @ Nov 22 2005, 04:05 PM)I though... Nov 22 2005, 03:17 PM
Marcel QUOTE (helvick @ Nov 22 2005, 03:17 PM)The on... Nov 24 2005, 08:55 AM
mars loon 12/5/2005
Significant New Power Information from ... Dec 6 2005, 06:55 AM
ElkGroveDan QUOTE (maycm @ Nov 22 2005, 03:05 PM)From the... Nov 22 2005, 03:51 PM
imran QUOTE (maycm @ Nov 22 2005, 03:05 PM)From the... Nov 22 2005, 03:52 PM
helvick QUOTE (imran @ Nov 22 2005, 04:52 PM)Wasn... Nov 22 2005, 05:14 PM
TheChemist QUOTE spirit is travelling down a fairly steep nor... Nov 22 2005, 05:37 PM
helvick QUOTE (TheChemist @ Nov 22 2005, 06:37 PM)Spi... Nov 22 2005, 06:28 PM

sattrackpro QUOTE (helvick @ Nov 22 2005, 11:28 AM)Can an... Jan 21 2006, 02:27 PM
maycm QUOTE (TheChemist @ Nov 22 2005, 01:37 PM)Spi... Nov 22 2005, 07:28 PM
RNeuhaus Interesting graph. The worst time would be around ... Dec 6 2005, 03:52 PM
mars loon QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Dec 6 2005, 03:52 PM)Intere... Dec 10 2005, 02:23 PM
ljk4-1 Rovers Exceed Expectations
http://www.cornellsun.... Jan 20 2006, 03:30 PM
ljk4-1 QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Jan 20 2006, 10:30 AM)Ro... Jan 23 2006, 05:18 PM
sattrackpro There are many differences, but primary is the lat... Jan 21 2006, 02:02 PM
mars loon QUOTE (sattrackpro @ Jan 21 2006, 02:02 PM)Dr... Jan 21 2006, 02:50 PM
PhilCo126 Are all the drive motors on the wheels in operatio... Jan 21 2006, 03:04 PM
Marcel QUOTE (PhilCo126 @ Jan 21 2006, 03:04 PM)Are ... Jan 24 2006, 11:07 AM
ljk4-1 TWIN MARS ROVERS STILL EXPLORING AFTER TWO YEARS
-... Jan 25 2006, 05:34 PM
sattrackpro QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Jan 25 2006, 10:34 AM)TW... Jan 26 2006, 03:00 AM
mcaplinger QUOTE (sattrackpro @ Jan 25 2006, 07:00 PM)Bu... Jan 26 2006, 05:38 AM
djellison Quite - if you're asking for a certain 90 sols... Jan 26 2006, 10:17 AM
helvick QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 26 2006, 11:17 AM)I... Jan 26 2006, 01:04 PM
elakdawalla QUOTE (helvick @ Jan 26 2006, 05:04 AM)And re... Feb 2 2006, 10:43 PM
RNeuhaus QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Feb 2 2006, 05:43 PM)Wha... Feb 3 2006, 04:27 AM
helvick QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Feb 2 2006, 11:43 PM)Wha... Feb 3 2006, 09:03 AM
djellison I think basically - you have to have the rovers ... Feb 3 2006, 10:07 AM
Cugel This is easy to reproduce at home:
1. Take your g... Feb 3 2006, 10:51 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (Cugel @ Feb 3 2006, 11:51 AM)This is e... Feb 3 2006, 01:46 PM
djellison The MER battery's have a better thermal profil... Feb 3 2006, 10:53 AM
tty As for freezing a battery to death, oddly enough i... Feb 3 2006, 12:03 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (tty @ Feb 3 2006, 01:03 PM)As for free... Feb 3 2006, 01:48 PM
djellison I used to freeze tamagochi's for fun
Doug Feb 3 2006, 01:03 PM
Cugel Actually not so difficult to grasp: a battery is n... Feb 3 2006, 04:45 PM
ljk4-1 February 9, 2006 | If NASA's Mars Exploration ... Feb 11 2006, 04:11 AM
helvick I've overhauled my solar power estimate charts... Feb 18 2006, 09:45 PM
jamescanvin QUOTE (helvick @ Feb 19 2006, 08:45 AM) I... Feb 19 2006, 01:26 AM
Tom Tamlyn Very impressive work!
What is responsible for... Feb 19 2006, 02:47 AM

helvick QUOTE (Tom Tamlyn @ Feb 19 2006, 02:47 AM... Feb 19 2006, 01:10 PM
RNeuhaus QUOTE (helvick @ Feb 18 2006, 04:45 PM) I... Feb 19 2006, 03:23 AM
climber QUOTE (helvick @ Feb 18 2006, 10:45 PM) I... Feb 21 2006, 01:41 PM

Bob Shaw QUOTE (climber @ Feb 21 2006, 01:41 PM) T... Feb 21 2006, 02:12 PM

helvick QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Feb 21 2006, 02:12 PM) ... Feb 21 2006, 02:24 PM

helvick Climber,
I had a quick look at this and dumped ou... Feb 21 2006, 06:16 PM

climber QUOTE (helvick @ Feb 21 2006, 07:16 PM) C... Feb 21 2006, 11:08 PM

helvick QUOTE (climber @ Feb 21 2006, 11:08 PM) I... Feb 21 2006, 11:51 PM
jamescanvin QUOTE (helvick @ Feb 19 2006, 08:45 AM) S... Feb 21 2006, 09:43 PM
alan QUOTE (helvick @ Feb 19 2006, 07:10 AM) T... Feb 19 2006, 02:02 PM
helvick QUOTE (alan @ Feb 19 2006, 02:02 PM) No e... Feb 19 2006, 02:38 PM
helvick A slight update. Browsing back through this I real... Feb 19 2006, 09:42 PM
abalone QUOTE (helvick @ Feb 20 2006, 08:42 AM) A... Feb 21 2006, 11:18 AM
Bob Shaw Abalone:
1950s Moon and Mars exploration plans as... Feb 21 2006, 11:47 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (abalone @ Feb 21 2006, 11:53 AM) i... Feb 21 2006, 11:59 AM
abalone QUOTE (helvick @ Feb 22 2006, 12:08 AM) Y... Feb 21 2006, 08:30 PM
helvick QUOTE (abalone @ Feb 21 2006, 08:30 PM) I... Feb 21 2006, 09:11 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (helvick @ Feb 21 2006, 09:11 PM) A... Feb 21 2006, 10:20 PM
djellison Here's my cunning maths on the matter
My dig... Feb 21 2006, 12:11 PM
djellison I would have thought slopes of 25 degrees would be... Feb 21 2006, 09:52 PM
helvick QUOTE (djellison @ Feb 21 2006, 09:52 PM)... Feb 21 2006, 11:02 PM
RNeuhaus QUOTE (djellison @ Feb 21 2006, 04:52 PM)... Feb 22 2006, 03:31 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 08:22 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|