IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Oppy Vs Spirit Power Consumption
maycm
post Nov 22 2005, 03:05 PM
Post #1


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 90
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 289



From the following "Space" article LINK

QUOTE
Spirit’s solar arrays currently produce about 650 watt hours while Opportunity’s generate up to 700 watt hours, Laubach said. A minimum of 300 watt hours is required for Spirit to function, though Opportunity can operate on slightly less, she added.


What is the reason for the lower power requirements of Oppy?

I thought the two rovers were identical.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
djellison
post Feb 21 2006, 11:46 AM
Post #2


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14457
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Ahh - you're assuming 100% efficiency in the use of petrol.

Typically, an efficient Petrol engine is 30%, Diesel perhaps as much as 40% or more

So you'd need not 72 ml/sol, but more like 220 ml/sol smile.gif

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
abalone
post Feb 21 2006, 11:53 AM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 362
Joined: 12-June 05
From: Kiama, Australia
Member No.: 409



QUOTE (djellison @ Feb 21 2006, 10:46 PM) *
Ahh - you're assuming 100% efficiency in the use of petrol.

Typically, an efficient Petrol engine is 30%, Diesel perhaps as much as 40% or more

So you'd need not 72 ml/sol, but more like 220 ml/sol smile.gif

Doug

It was only intended as a comparison. If you use the petrol in a fuel cell you could get 70% eficiency. Maybe petrol was a poor choice, have worked it out for liquid hydrogen and its about 10.5g/day or about 8kg for the entire mission if we assume a fuel cell efficency of 80%. And before you ask, hey it not my fault there is no oxygen on Mars.

I only did the calculations to illustrate the small amount of energy that we are dealing with here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
helvick
post Feb 21 2006, 01:08 PM
Post #4


Dublin Correspondent
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1799
Joined: 28-March 05
From: Celbridge, Ireland
Member No.: 220



QUOTE (abalone @ Feb 21 2006, 11:53 AM) *
It was only intended as a comparison. If you use the petrol in a fuel cell you could get 70% eficiency. Maybe petrol was a poor choice, have worked it out for liquid hydrogen and its about 10.5g/day or about 8kg for the entire mission if we assume a fuel cell efficency of 80%. And before you ask, hey it not my fault there is no oxygen on Mars.
I only did the calculations to illustrate the small amount of energy that we are dealing with here

You'll still need an additional 8x the mass of O2 for your fuel cell ~ 370kg in total. I've got a number somewhere that has a specific power for Fuel cells of ~ 0.03kw /kg. So you'd need about 100kg of fuel cell and maybe 100kgor more of cryo storage for the fuel. It would be kind of bulky.

If you forget LH2\LO2 and go for C12H26 (Kerosene)\H2O2 as your oxidiser then you'd have a 10:1 oxidiser:fuel mass ratio. All you really needed for MER was a 90day mission so you could have safely budgeted for only 1kg of fuel, 10kg of oxidiser and throw in about 10kg max for a reliable and efficient 140 watt self contained diesel generator.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Feb 21 2006, 01:36 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



QUOTE (helvick @ Feb 21 2006, 01:08 PM) *
You'll still need an additional 8x the mass of O2 for your fuel cell ~ 370kg in total. I've got a number somewhere that has a specific power for Fuel cells of ~ 0.03kw /kg. So you'd need about 100kg of fuel cell and maybe 100kgor more of cryo storage for the fuel. It would be kind of bulky.

If you forget LH2\LO2 and go for C12H26 (Kerosene)\H2O2 as your oxidiser then you'd have a 10:1 oxidiser:fuel mass ratio. All you really needed for MER was a 90day mission so you could have safely budgeted for only 1kg of fuel, 10kg of oxidiser and throw in about 10kg max for a reliable and efficient 140 watt self contained diesel generator.


Ah, of course, that makes more sense - so, for a mission requiring 'bursts' of mechanical energy, might not a hybrid diesel/solar electric vehicle make a lot of sense? Think of it as a winter warmer... ...and I bet you could have a much smaller engine - look at the engines in R/C models, UAVs etc.

Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Feb 26 2006, 12:04 AM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1599
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Feb 21 2006, 08:36 AM) *
Ah, of course, that makes more sense - so, for a mission requiring 'bursts' of mechanical energy, might not a hybrid diesel/solar electric vehicle make a lot of sense? Think of it as a winter warmer... ...and I bet you could have a much smaller engine - look at the engines in R/C models, UAVs etc.

How about a solar concentrator powering a stirling engine turning a flywheel? wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Feb 26 2006, 12:29 AM
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



QUOTE (stevesliva @ Feb 26 2006, 12:04 AM) *
How about a solar concentrator powering a stirling engine turning a flywheel? wink.gif


Yes, of course - and a hydrocarbon/oxygen engine as previously described has a major efficiency problem in the sense that it produces heat rather than mechanical energy. But what do we need inside a Mars rover, but *heat*? And as for the exhaust gasses, you store 'em. And then you use them to blow your solar concentrator/panels/etc free of dust...

The bottom line is that an exclusive approach to power generation actually *reduces* your options rather than expanding your mission!

Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- maycm   Oppy Vs Spirit Power Consumption   Nov 22 2005, 03:05 PM
- - RNeuhaus   QUOTE (maycm @ Nov 22 2005, 10:05 AM)From the...   Nov 22 2005, 03:15 PM
- - helvick   QUOTE (maycm @ Nov 22 2005, 04:05 PM)I though...   Nov 22 2005, 03:17 PM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (helvick @ Nov 22 2005, 03:17 PM)The on...   Nov 24 2005, 08:55 AM
|- - mars loon   12/5/2005 Significant New Power Information from ...   Dec 6 2005, 06:55 AM
- - ElkGroveDan   QUOTE (maycm @ Nov 22 2005, 03:05 PM)From the...   Nov 22 2005, 03:51 PM
- - imran   QUOTE (maycm @ Nov 22 2005, 03:05 PM)From the...   Nov 22 2005, 03:52 PM
|- - helvick   QUOTE (imran @ Nov 22 2005, 04:52 PM)Wasn...   Nov 22 2005, 05:14 PM
- - TheChemist   QUOTE spirit is travelling down a fairly steep nor...   Nov 22 2005, 05:37 PM
|- - helvick   QUOTE (TheChemist @ Nov 22 2005, 06:37 PM)Spi...   Nov 22 2005, 06:28 PM
||- - sattrackpro   QUOTE (helvick @ Nov 22 2005, 11:28 AM)Can an...   Jan 21 2006, 02:27 PM
|- - maycm   QUOTE (TheChemist @ Nov 22 2005, 01:37 PM)Spi...   Nov 22 2005, 07:28 PM
- - RNeuhaus   Interesting graph. The worst time would be around ...   Dec 6 2005, 03:52 PM
|- - mars loon   QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Dec 6 2005, 03:52 PM)Intere...   Dec 10 2005, 02:23 PM
|- - ljk4-1   Rovers Exceed Expectations http://www.cornellsun....   Jan 20 2006, 03:30 PM
|- - ljk4-1   QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Jan 20 2006, 10:30 AM)Ro...   Jan 23 2006, 05:18 PM
- - sattrackpro   There are many differences, but primary is the lat...   Jan 21 2006, 02:02 PM
|- - mars loon   QUOTE (sattrackpro @ Jan 21 2006, 02:02 PM)Dr...   Jan 21 2006, 02:50 PM
- - PhilCo126   Are all the drive motors on the wheels in operatio...   Jan 21 2006, 03:04 PM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (PhilCo126 @ Jan 21 2006, 03:04 PM)Are ...   Jan 24 2006, 11:07 AM
|- - ljk4-1   TWIN MARS ROVERS STILL EXPLORING AFTER TWO YEARS -...   Jan 25 2006, 05:34 PM
|- - sattrackpro   QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Jan 25 2006, 10:34 AM)TW...   Jan 26 2006, 03:00 AM
|- - mcaplinger   QUOTE (sattrackpro @ Jan 25 2006, 07:00 PM)Bu...   Jan 26 2006, 05:38 AM
- - djellison   Quite - if you're asking for a certain 90 sols...   Jan 26 2006, 10:17 AM
|- - helvick   QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 26 2006, 11:17 AM)I...   Jan 26 2006, 01:04 PM
|- - elakdawalla   QUOTE (helvick @ Jan 26 2006, 05:04 AM)And re...   Feb 2 2006, 10:43 PM
|- - RNeuhaus   QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Feb 2 2006, 05:43 PM)Wha...   Feb 3 2006, 04:27 AM
|- - helvick   QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Feb 2 2006, 11:43 PM)Wha...   Feb 3 2006, 09:03 AM
- - djellison   I think basically - you have to have the rovers ...   Feb 3 2006, 10:07 AM
- - Cugel   This is easy to reproduce at home: 1. Take your g...   Feb 3 2006, 10:51 AM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (Cugel @ Feb 3 2006, 11:51 AM)This is e...   Feb 3 2006, 01:46 PM
- - djellison   The MER battery's have a better thermal profil...   Feb 3 2006, 10:53 AM
- - tty   As for freezing a battery to death, oddly enough i...   Feb 3 2006, 12:03 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (tty @ Feb 3 2006, 01:03 PM)As for free...   Feb 3 2006, 01:48 PM
- - djellison   I used to freeze tamagochi's for fun Doug   Feb 3 2006, 01:03 PM
- - Cugel   Actually not so difficult to grasp: a battery is n...   Feb 3 2006, 04:45 PM
|- - ljk4-1   February 9, 2006 | If NASA's Mars Exploration ...   Feb 11 2006, 04:11 AM
- - helvick   I've overhauled my solar power estimate charts...   Feb 18 2006, 09:45 PM
|- - jamescanvin   QUOTE (helvick @ Feb 19 2006, 08:45 AM) I...   Feb 19 2006, 01:26 AM
|- - Tom Tamlyn   Very impressive work! What is responsible for...   Feb 19 2006, 02:47 AM
||- - helvick   QUOTE (Tom Tamlyn @ Feb 19 2006, 02:47 AM...   Feb 19 2006, 01:10 PM
|- - RNeuhaus   QUOTE (helvick @ Feb 18 2006, 04:45 PM) I...   Feb 19 2006, 03:23 AM
|- - climber   QUOTE (helvick @ Feb 18 2006, 10:45 PM) I...   Feb 21 2006, 01:41 PM
||- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (climber @ Feb 21 2006, 01:41 PM) T...   Feb 21 2006, 02:12 PM
||- - helvick   QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Feb 21 2006, 02:12 PM) ...   Feb 21 2006, 02:24 PM
||- - helvick   Climber, I had a quick look at this and dumped ou...   Feb 21 2006, 06:16 PM
||- - climber   QUOTE (helvick @ Feb 21 2006, 07:16 PM) C...   Feb 21 2006, 11:08 PM
||- - helvick   QUOTE (climber @ Feb 21 2006, 11:08 PM) I...   Feb 21 2006, 11:51 PM
|- - jamescanvin   QUOTE (helvick @ Feb 19 2006, 08:45 AM) S...   Feb 21 2006, 09:43 PM
- - alan   QUOTE (helvick @ Feb 19 2006, 07:10 AM) T...   Feb 19 2006, 02:02 PM
|- - helvick   QUOTE (alan @ Feb 19 2006, 02:02 PM) No e...   Feb 19 2006, 02:38 PM
|- - helvick   A slight update. Browsing back through this I real...   Feb 19 2006, 09:42 PM
|- - abalone   QUOTE (helvick @ Feb 20 2006, 08:42 AM) A...   Feb 21 2006, 11:18 AM
|- - Bob Shaw   Abalone: 1950s Moon and Mars exploration plans as...   Feb 21 2006, 11:47 AM
- - djellison   Ahh - you're assuming 100% efficiency in the u...   Feb 21 2006, 11:46 AM
|- - abalone   QUOTE (djellison @ Feb 21 2006, 10:46 PM)...   Feb 21 2006, 11:53 AM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (abalone @ Feb 21 2006, 11:53 AM) i...   Feb 21 2006, 11:59 AM
|- - helvick   QUOTE (abalone @ Feb 21 2006, 11:53 AM) I...   Feb 21 2006, 01:08 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (helvick @ Feb 21 2006, 01:08 PM) Y...   Feb 21 2006, 01:36 PM
||- - stevesliva   QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Feb 21 2006, 08:36 AM) ...   Feb 26 2006, 12:04 AM
||- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (stevesliva @ Feb 26 2006, 12:04 AM...   Feb 26 2006, 12:29 AM
|- - abalone   QUOTE (helvick @ Feb 22 2006, 12:08 AM) Y...   Feb 21 2006, 08:30 PM
|- - helvick   QUOTE (abalone @ Feb 21 2006, 08:30 PM) I...   Feb 21 2006, 09:11 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (helvick @ Feb 21 2006, 09:11 PM) A...   Feb 21 2006, 10:20 PM
- - djellison   Here's my cunning maths on the matter My dig...   Feb 21 2006, 12:11 PM
- - djellison   I would have thought slopes of 25 degrees would be...   Feb 21 2006, 09:52 PM
- - helvick   QUOTE (djellison @ Feb 21 2006, 09:52 PM)...   Feb 21 2006, 11:02 PM
- - RNeuhaus   QUOTE (djellison @ Feb 21 2006, 04:52 PM)...   Feb 22 2006, 03:31 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 08:22 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.