My Assistant
Iapetus New Year's Eve Mosaic |
Dec 2 2005, 04:34 PM
Post
#1
|
||
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
From the PDS data, consists of only two multispectral footprints taken during the encounter. I used IR1 + BL filters with a synthetic green to minimize problems with changing viewing geometry during different exposures. The end result is practically the same, color-wise. The image stitching could have been better, but I believe it's fairly decent as is.
-------------------- |
|
|
|
||
![]() |
Dec 2 2005, 06:03 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3242 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
? I just looked at the GLOCOLA sequence, where you got those images, and there are GRN filter images for both footprints. Why the synthetic image? The GRN images are N1483150949_1 and N1483150968_1 for the bottom frame and N1483152093_1 for the bottom frame. If you want a true color mosaic, there are also RED filter images for both frames (top=N1483152247_1 and bottom=N1483151197_1).
EDIT: AHHH! I should have read the ENTIRE post. Sorry, you wanted to prevent fringing... Iapetus rotates so slowly and the encounter was so slow that you shouldn't have that problem... -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
|
Dec 2 2005, 06:09 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
I know there are GRN images as well as RED ones but the time between exposures produces bad color fringing. IIRC, the IR1 and BL1 were taken immeiately one after the other so the perspective is close to identical. Also I wanted to see what could be one with only 2 filters. I think the end result looks very similar to the official CICLOPS release.
I don't have any software that's able to reproject all images to the same viewing geometry, if you know any such programs, I'm listening... EDIT on your edit: There *shouldn't* be fringing, but believe me there is... -------------------- |
|
|
|
Dec 2 2005, 06:34 PM
Post
#4
|
||
![]() Interplanetary Dumpster Diver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 4408 Joined: 17-February 04 From: Powell, TN Member No.: 33 |
QUOTE (ugordan @ Dec 2 2005, 04:34 PM) From the PDS data, consists of only two multispectral footprints taken during the encounter. I used IR1 + BL filters with a synthetic green to minimize problems with changing viewing geometry during different exposures. The end result is practically the same, color-wise. The image stitching could have been better, but I believe it's fairly decent as is. One thing you could do for gap fill is generate a wide angle color view, and then overlay it on higher resolution black and white data for the areas not covered by high resolution color data. -------------------- |
|
|
|
||
Dec 2 2005, 06:38 PM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
QUOTE (tedstryk @ Dec 2 2005, 07:34 PM) One thing you could do for gap fill is generate a wide angle color view, and then overlay it on higher resolution black and white data for the areas not covered by high resolution color data. Tried that. Actually, I gave up at the point on trying to fit the NAC clear frame of the belly-band, the viewing angle is so much different than this mosaic, it just wouldn't fit. Without any proper processing tools, this is about the best I can do... Even with better tools I wonder how much better one can do, given the *weirdest* shape of this moon. -------------------- |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 04:43 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|