My Assistant
Near-future Extinction Event ? |
| Guest_PhilCo126_* |
Dec 9 2005, 08:16 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Guests |
The Near-Earth Asteroid 99942 Apophis ( former designation 2004 MN4 ) was headline news again this week both in Newspapers & TV news. Observations pointed out that the Asteroid climbed a bit higher on the Torino impact hazard scale ( equivalent cosmic ‘Richter’ scale ) and could hit the Earth ( Southern Hemisphere ) on April 13, 2036 ( a Friday 13th I believe ).
Anyway, Apophis should pass between the Moon & Earth ( distance 250.000 KM ) in April 2029 … an amazing sight visible from Europe! Interesting to know is the fact that European Space Agency ESA plans a mission to find out if an asteroid could be deflected from its course ( Don Quichote mission: Hidalgo is an impacter & Sancho is the observer probe ). American astronauts LU & LOVE wrote a paper in NATURE about a tug-rocket and NASA is making plans for a mission called ‘ The Son of Deep Impact ‘ … to be continued… More on the Asteroid at: http://www.esa.int/gsp/ACT/mission_analysis/asteroid.htm Philip |
|
|
|
![]() |
Dec 9 2005, 07:37 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1636 Joined: 9-May 05 From: Lima, Peru Member No.: 385 |
I have read a paper about "Gravitation Tractor for Towing Asteroids" It takes many years to deviate the asteroid's path. As an example:
if the asteroid is 200 meters diameter, with a density of 2g/cm^3, provided it can maintain a total thrust T = 1 N. The velocity change imparted to the asteroid per year of hovering is Δv = 4.2×10−3 (m/ 2×104 Kg)(d /100m)−2 (m/ s)( yr)−1. Because Δv is largely independent of the asteroid’s detailed structure and composition, the effect on the asteroid’s orbit is predictable and controllable, as needed for a practical deflection scheme. The mean change in velocity required to deflect an asteroid from an Earth impact trajectory is ~3.5×10−2 / t m/s where t is the lead time in years. Thus, in the example above, a 20 ton gravitational tractor can deflect a typical 200m asteroid, given a lead time of about 20 years. The thrust and total fuel requirements of this mission are well within the capability of proposed 100kW nuclear-electric propulsion systems, using about 4 tons of fuel to accomplish the typical 15 km/sec rendezvous and about 400 Kg for the actual deflection. For a given spacecraft mass, the fuel required for the deflection scales linearly with the asteroid mass. Deflecting a larger asteroid requires a heavier spacecraft, longer time spent hovering, or more lead time. However, in the special case where an asteroid has a close Earth approach followed by a later return and impact, the change in velocity needed to prevent an impact can be many orders of magnitude smaller if applied before the close approach. For example, the asteroid 99942 Apophis (2004 MN4), a 320m asteroid that will swing by the Earth at a distance of ~30000km in 2029, has a small 10−4 probability of returning to strike the Earth in 2035 or 2036. If it indeed is on a return impact trajectory, a deflection Δv of only ~10−6m/s a few years before the close approach in 2029 would prevent a later impact (Carusi, personal communication). In this case, a 1 ton gravitational tractor with conventional chemical thrusters could accomplish this deflection mission since only about 0.1 Newtons of thrust are required for a duration of about a month. Should such a deflection mission prove necessary, a gravitational tractor spacecraft offers a viable method of controllably steering asteroid 99942 Apophis away from an Earth impact. We are still on time to catch it up. Rodolfo
Attached File(s)
|
|
|
|
PhilCo126 Near-future Extinction Event ? Dec 9 2005, 08:16 AM
Rob Pinnegar I guess these guys must be pretty certain about th... Dec 9 2005, 10:03 AM
ljk4-1 Paper: astro-ph/0512204
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 05:... Dec 9 2005, 06:17 PM

Richard Trigaux QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Dec 9 2005, 06:17 PM)Pap... Dec 9 2005, 07:15 PM
Richard Trigaux QUOTE (Rob Pinnegar @ Dec 9 2005, 10:03 AM)I ... Dec 9 2005, 07:19 PM
JRehling QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Dec 9 2005, 11:19 AM... Dec 9 2005, 07:27 PM
dvandorn QUOTE (JRehling @ Dec 9 2005, 01:27 PM)If a b... Dec 10 2005, 02:01 AM
Richard Trigaux QUOTE (dvandorn @ Dec 10 2005, 02:01 AM)I wou... Dec 10 2005, 11:40 AM
RNeuhaus Urge to Merge: Here Comes Andromeda
The above ar... Dec 9 2005, 08:13 PM
tty QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Dec 9 2005, 10:13 PM)Urge t... Dec 10 2005, 05:02 PM
mike You mean to say that eventually we'll all die ... Dec 9 2005, 10:22 PM
Richard Trigaux Important things in the discutio above, JRehling,... Dec 10 2005, 10:29 AM
tty QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Dec 10 2005, 12:29 P... Dec 10 2005, 05:22 PM

Bob Shaw I hate to point out a grim and downright unsettlin... Dec 10 2005, 06:17 PM


Richard Trigaux QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Dec 10 2005, 06:17 PM)I hat... Dec 11 2005, 12:53 PM


dvandorn QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Dec 11 2005, 06:53 A... Dec 11 2005, 08:20 PM

Richard Trigaux QUOTE (tty @ Dec 10 2005, 05:22 PM)Actually t... Dec 11 2005, 12:28 PM

JRehling QUOTE (tty @ Dec 10 2005, 09:22 AM)Actually t... Dec 11 2005, 05:44 PM

Richard Trigaux QUOTE (JRehling @ Dec 11 2005, 05:44 PM)Two b... Dec 11 2005, 06:08 PM
dvandorn QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Dec 10 2005, 04:29 A... Dec 11 2005, 02:51 AM
mchan QUOTE (dvandorn @ Dec 10 2005, 06:51 PM)Actua... Dec 11 2005, 03:37 AM
tty QUOTE (dvandorn @ Dec 11 2005, 04:51 AM)Actua... Dec 12 2005, 07:54 PM
tfisher QUOTE (PhilCo126 @ Dec 9 2005, 04:16 AM)The N... Dec 10 2005, 03:24 PM
PhilCo126 Well the diameter of Apophis is 320 meter so it wo... Dec 10 2005, 06:23 PM
mike It could be that if a few more species become exti... Dec 10 2005, 08:56 PM
Tom Ames QUOTE (mike @ Dec 10 2005, 03:56 PM)It could ... Dec 13 2005, 01:38 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (Tom Ames @ Dec 13 2005, 02:38 AM)Yeah,... Dec 14 2005, 11:09 PM
BruceMoomaw Yep -- remember that deafening series of "exp... Dec 11 2005, 06:34 AM
mike If I weren't at least a little selfish, I... Dec 11 2005, 09:41 PM
BruceMoomaw We're getting rather off the subject here; but... Dec 11 2005, 09:46 PM
PhilCo126 An impact on the Moon would be an amazing sight ..... Dec 12 2005, 08:04 AM
Richard Trigaux QUOTE (PhilCo126 @ Dec 12 2005, 08:04 AM)An i... Dec 12 2005, 08:25 AM
Richard Trigaux Dvandorn and BruceMoomaw,
my point was certainly ... Dec 12 2005, 08:52 AM
dvandorn And on this, Richard, we must agree to disagree. ... Dec 12 2005, 09:18 AM
Richard Trigaux QUOTE (dvandorn @ Dec 12 2005, 09:18 AM)And o... Dec 12 2005, 09:48 AM
ljk4-1 QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Dec 12 2005, 04:48 A... Dec 12 2005, 02:34 PM
RNeuhaus Setting back to the topic, after a nuke explotion ... Dec 12 2005, 02:27 PM
BruceMoomaw Believe me, when the human race starts modifying t... Dec 12 2005, 09:52 PM
tty QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Dec 12 2005, 11:52 PM)Be... Dec 12 2005, 10:21 PM
BruceMoomaw While we're on this cheery subject: I've a... Dec 12 2005, 09:56 PM
ljk4-1 QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Dec 12 2005, 04:56 PM)Wh... Dec 12 2005, 10:23 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Dec 12 2005, 10:56 PM)Wh... Dec 12 2005, 11:14 PM
tuomio Great power brings great responsibilities. Ongoing... Dec 12 2005, 10:38 PM
mike Eh, the whole 'technology is bad' issue co... Dec 12 2005, 10:44 PM
BruceMoomaw "Cheer up -- it's largely a one-generatio... Dec 13 2005, 01:27 AM
BruceMoomaw As for "Gaia being a superorganism that delib... Dec 13 2005, 01:31 AM
ljk4-1 QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Dec 12 2005, 08:31 PM)As... Dec 14 2005, 08:58 PM

JRehling The real hope for our civilization is that science... Dec 14 2005, 10:53 PM


Richard Trigaux QUOTE (JRehling @ Dec 14 2005, 10:53 PM)The r... Dec 15 2005, 09:59 AM


JRehling QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Dec 15 2005, 01:59 A... Dec 15 2005, 05:40 PM


Richard Trigaux QUOTE (JRehling @ Dec 15 2005, 05:40 PM)I qui... Dec 15 2005, 07:49 PM

Richard Trigaux QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Dec 14 2005, 08:58 PM)Yo... Dec 15 2005, 09:52 AM


ljk4-1 QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Dec 15 2005, 04:52 A... Dec 15 2005, 03:15 PM

lyford QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Dec 14 2005, 12:58 PM)Yo... Dec 15 2005, 08:18 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Dec 13 2005, 02:31 AM)As... Dec 14 2005, 11:22 PM
dvandorn In re the "good vs. evil" issue -- I thi... Dec 13 2005, 07:12 AM
mike Eh, you guys are just afraid that humanity might a... Dec 13 2005, 05:26 PM
Richard Trigaux Cheap cabaret philosophy just to continue doing no... Dec 13 2005, 07:16 PM
tty QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Dec 13 2005, 09:16 P... Dec 13 2005, 10:08 PM
Richard Trigaux QUOTE (tty @ Dec 13 2005, 10:08 PM)Causing an... Dec 14 2005, 11:24 AM
RNeuhaus QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Dec 14 2005, 06:24 A... Dec 14 2005, 05:26 PM
lyford Rodolfo -
I agree completely - we should be enth... Dec 14 2005, 07:21 PM
RNeuhaus The paragraph was extracted from http://www.space.... Dec 14 2005, 09:01 PM
Richard Trigaux QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Dec 14 2005, 09:01 PM)That ... Dec 15 2005, 09:56 AM
RNeuhaus QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Dec 15 2005, 04:56 A... Dec 15 2005, 02:48 PM
BruceMoomaw "With enough diffuse speculation, how can any... Dec 15 2005, 11:36 AM
JRehling QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Dec 15 2005, 03:36 AM)... Dec 15 2005, 05:29 PM
mike QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Dec 15 2005, 03:36 AM)... Dec 15 2005, 06:12 PM
Chmee QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Dec 15 2005, 07:36 AM)... Dec 15 2005, 06:22 PM
dvandorn This is something that we need to spend some time ... Dec 15 2005, 05:11 PM
BruceMoomaw OK; but then, when the Sacred Asteroidal Republic ... Dec 15 2005, 06:13 PM
BruceMoomaw And in response to Mike: why should I go to the tr... Dec 15 2005, 06:20 PM
mike QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Dec 15 2005, 10:20 AM)An... Dec 15 2005, 08:13 PM
BruceMoomaw Well, while we really ARE geting off the subject o... Dec 15 2005, 09:19 PM
mike Avoided nuclear war by 'a succession of miracl... Dec 15 2005, 10:41 PM
BruceMoomaw So who's complaining? Why complain about the ... Dec 15 2005, 10:51 PM
BruceMoomaw P.S.: Regarding the fact that we've avoided nu... Dec 15 2005, 10:59 PM
tty QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Dec 16 2005, 12:59 AM)P.... Dec 16 2005, 08:39 PM
mike By calling them 'miracles' you are acknowl... Dec 16 2005, 12:59 AM
lyford Don't forget these narrowly avoided rays of su... Dec 16 2005, 01:42 AM
BruceMoomaw Yeah, Lyford, I didn't mention the narrow Indi... Dec 16 2005, 02:42 AM
mike It certainly does seem to be easier to destroy tha... Dec 16 2005, 03:55 PM
ljk4-1 Humanity will survive for the same reason American... Dec 16 2005, 04:28 PM
chris Nick Bostrom from the University of Oxford Philoso... Dec 16 2005, 04:50 PM
BruceMoomaw More on Lyford's question at http://www.lpi.us... Dec 16 2005, 11:00 PM
lyford Thanks Bruce - interesting
QUOTE Here we consider ... Dec 17 2005, 12:19 AM
Bob Shaw Bruce:
Perhaps we should *encourage* all sorts of... Dec 17 2005, 12:43 AM
edstrick Note that Cis-Lunar manned transportation capacity... Dec 17 2005, 06:33 AM
ustrax Nice thing to play with...
http://www.lpl.arizo... Jan 5 2006, 04:01 PM
ljk4-1 THE COMING DARK AGE
Newsletter
December, 2005
1... Jan 5 2006, 10:10 PM
ustrax QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Jan 5 2006, 10:10 PM)THE... Jan 5 2006, 11:16 PM
ljk4-1 A NEO to monitor:
http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/20... Jan 9 2006, 03:43 PM
ljk4-1 TOP STORIES
COMETS & ASTEROIDS - our new Spec... Feb 16 2006, 05:57 PM
ljk4-1 STELLAR CHEMISTRY
- Killer GRB Unlikely In The Ga... Apr 19 2006, 02:54 PM
Richard Trigaux Interesting result. But it eliminates the only sim... Apr 19 2006, 06:26 PM
ljk4-1 We are not really prepared to stop a space rock fr... Apr 25 2006, 03:02 PM
Richard Trigaux To deflect an asteroid, we would need the equivale... Apr 25 2006, 03:19 PM
Bob Shaw Richard:
The 'gravitational tractor' conc... Apr 25 2006, 04:09 PM
Richard Trigaux The gravitation is a very weak force, and a gravit... Apr 25 2006, 04:28 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 08:53 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|