[X] My Assistant

[The Singing Badg...]

For a while I've been realising that scale is difficult to judge in rover pictures. Given the close horizon on Mars, I often suspect that the features I'm looking at may be smaller than I think. For example, would climbing the Columbia Hills be an easy ten-minute stroll or an epic climb for a human?

Of course I can look up the numerical sizes of these features but numbers don't always make things as clear as pictures. Perhaps some of you who specialise in image manipulation might be able to produce some versions of rover pictures with a superimposed average-sized human figure, to give an idea of how these features would appear to human explorers?

Just a thought. If it sounds utterly pointless, ignore me!