IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Rev 20 Iapetus Non-targeted Jan 25,06, Flyby Discussion
Decepticon
post Jan 4 2006, 06:16 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1279
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



QUOTE
Here's what extrapolating the current SPICE kernels yields:

IAPETUS 2005 NOV 12 14:34:49 185078153 415,451 km arcmin=12.1
IAPETUS 2006 JAN 25 21:13:08 191495653 873,345 km arcmin=5.7

IAPETUS 2006 APR 11 17:16:28 198047853 602,419 km arcmin=8.3
IAPETUS 2007 SEP 10 12:31:28 242699553 1,259 km arcmin=2186.8

Posted by jmknapp


This time a little further out.

Jan. 2006 - 879,000 km - 5.3 km/pixel - eastern Cassini Region and transition zone, part ofthe "moat" posted by VP


If anyone has made a animation of the encounter please post it!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Rob Pinnegar
post Jan 13 2006, 04:00 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 509
Joined: 2-July 05
From: Calgary, Alberta
Member No.: 426



A couple of points:

(1) Has anyone given much consideration to estimating the thickness of the dark layer in Cassini Regio? One would think that, if it is only a very thin layer, there should be at least one small crater somewhere that would show signs of having punched through it. (I realize frost migration could cover up such craters eventually, but it would take time.)

If the layer turns out to be a couple of kilometres thick, or even several hundred metres, this would have major ramifications. Do we have any idea?

(2) Not to kick a dead horse too much, but I'm going to throw in (one of) my old half baked hypotheses back into the ring. This one has to do with Hyperion's origin.

From what I recall, it's currently thought that Titan's atmosphere was originally something like 30 times more massive than it is now, based on isotope data. Considering the atmosphere's current height, one would therefore expect that it must have originally extended outwards quite a bit further than it does now.

This means that, back in the "old days" (i.e. the Hadean Eon) Titan's atmosphere would've made up a pretty good chunk of its total effective cross-section for collisions. From that, it's not too much of a stretch to imagine that, from time to time, large planetesimals would have come blazing through Titan's atmosphere without necessarily colliding with Titan itself.

Some of these planetesimals could have been broken up through a combination of atmospheric drag and the "disintegrative capture" process that was proposed to explain the origin of the Earth's Moon a few decades ago. Both of these effects will slow down the disrupted body, perhaps enough to allow its fragments to be captured into orbit around Saturn. I honestly don't know whether that is dynamically possible, but let's suppose for the moment that it is. (Incidentally, there are some papers on disintegrative capture in the "Origin of the Moon" conference volume from around 1986, if anyone is interested. These papers include some results of simulations, which are the source of some of the assertions I'm making here.)

Anyways, disintegrative capture tends to break the disrupted body into pieces that propagate outwards in a "spray". Since the pieces interact with each other gravitationally after disruption, they don't follow ballistic trajectories, so they wouldn't necessarily end up in Titan-crossing orbits. It wouldn't be surprising if some of the debris ended up in the 4:3 Titan resonance, where one would expect it to coalesce into a small moon. Whether or not we could get something as big as Hyperion out of this process is of course a big question.

If by some miracle this totally conjectural hypothesis were to turn out to be workable, then it would imply that the dark material on Hyperion might not be similar to what we see on Iapetus. Instead, it might be organic material from Titan's early atmosphere, that got assimilated into Hyperion, and hasn't boiled off yet because it's too deep inside the moon.

Any comments?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JRehling
post Jan 16 2006, 06:50 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2530
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 321



QUOTE (Rob Pinnegar @ Jan 13 2006, 08:00 AM)
A couple of points:

(1) Has anyone given much consideration to estimating the thickness of the dark layer in Cassini Regio? One would think that, if it is only a very thin layer, there should be at least one small crater somewhere that would show signs of having punched through it. (I realize frost migration could cover up such craters eventually, but it would take time.)

If the layer turns out to be a couple of kilometres thick, or even several hundred metres, this would have major ramifications. Do we have any idea?

(2) Not to kick a dead horse too much, but I'm going to throw in (one of) my old half baked hypotheses back into the ring. This one has to do with Hyperion's origin.

From what I recall, it's currently thought that Titan's atmosphere was originally something like 30 times more massive than it is now, based on isotope data. Considering the atmosphere's current height, one would therefore expect that it must have originally extended outwards quite a bit further than it does now.

This means that, back in the "old days" (i.e. the Hadean Eon) Titan's atmosphere would've made up a pretty good chunk of its total effective cross-section for collisions. From that, it's not too much of a stretch to imagine that, from time to time, large planetesimals would have come blazing through Titan's atmosphere without necessarily colliding with Titan itself.

Some of these planetesimals could have been broken up through a combination of atmospheric drag and the "disintegrative capture" process that was proposed to explain the origin of the Earth's Moon a few decades ago. Both of these effects will slow down the disrupted body, perhaps enough to allow its fragments to be captured into orbit around Saturn. I honestly don't know whether that is dynamically possible, but let's suppose for the moment that it is. (Incidentally, there are some papers on disintegrative capture in the "Origin of the Moon" conference volume from around 1986, if anyone is interested. These papers include some results of simulations, which are the source of some of the assertions I'm making here.)

Anyways, disintegrative capture tends to break the disrupted body into pieces that propagate outwards in a "spray". Since the pieces interact with each other gravitationally after disruption, they don't follow ballistic trajectories, so they wouldn't necessarily end up in Titan-crossing orbits. It wouldn't be surprising if some of the debris ended up in the 4:3 Titan resonance, where one would expect it to coalesce into a small moon. Whether or not we could get something as big as Hyperion out of this process is of course a big question.

If by some miracle this totally conjectural hypothesis were to turn out to be workable, then it would imply that the dark material on Hyperion might not be similar to what we see on Iapetus. Instead, it might be organic material from Titan's early atmosphere, that got assimilated into Hyperion, and hasn't boiled off yet because it's too deep inside the moon.

Any comments?
*


The layer is clearly either very thick (at least in some places) or fairly recent (or recently replensihed). An interesting possibility would be if the ridge is simply the thickest portion of a layer that is at least 10 to 15 km thick along that central line, with the depth tapering off to the edges. That's just a quirky possibility, but one that would exclude any of the explanations relying solely on some sort of cloud/debris that Iapetus is sopping up as it passes through it's orbit.

Your model is a two-parter: Titan's atmosphere as a source of dark stuff, and "sopping up from intersatellite space" as the means of delivery of the dark stuff onto Iapetus and Hyperion both.

I see trouble with the means-of-delivery part.

I can't see why Hyperion would have many large craters with no dark stuff (more or less inbetween ones that do have it) if "sopping up" were the means of delivery there. Or why intricate topographical features intruding into crater floors remain bright. Or even the whole of the non-crater-floor surface.

Why would Iapetus just happen to have a big ridge running down the middle of the area where fluffy dark stuff descended upon it? If Iapetus gathered many km of this stuff, how did, eg, Rhea end up with none? How are there bright mountains within western CR? How did dark stuff get to ring the western rims of the Snowman craters which are on the trailing side?

Perhaps Titan's atmosphere did end up as a source of interesting dark material, but if the means of delivery isn't there, then we wouldn't have any dark stuff thus transported to explain!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rob Pinnegar
post Jan 20 2006, 11:47 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 509
Joined: 2-July 05
From: Calgary, Alberta
Member No.: 426



QUOTE (JRehling @ Jan 16 2006, 12:50 PM)
I can't see why Hyperion would have many large craters with no dark stuff (more or less inbetween ones that do have it) if "sopping up" were the means of delivery there. Or why intricate topographical features intruding into crater floors remain bright. Or even the whole of the non-crater-floor surface.

For the most part, I'd intended this disintegrative-capture/atmospheric drag hypothesis as a wild, but possibly workable, idea, that might explain where Hyperion came from, and why it is a rubble pile. The idea that it might have "sopped up" some of Titan's atmosphere was something that I added in at the last minute as I was typing it out. Admittedly, I didn't think that part through very well. The points you've raised here are certainly good ones against it being true.

By the way, I didn't say anything about Titan's atmosphere being a source for Iapetus' dark material. I agree that at first glance there doesn't seem to be any way THAT could be true.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Decepticon   Rev 20 Iapetus Non-targeted Jan 25,06   Jan 4 2006, 06:16 PM
- - Decepticon   If possible can a MOD fix my date I put 15th inste...   Jan 4 2006, 06:20 PM
- - volcanopele   Fixed   Jan 4 2006, 07:20 PM
- - Decepticon   Sorry I sould have said in topic heading, the enco...   Jan 4 2006, 08:59 PM
|- - volcanopele   QUOTE (Decepticon @ Jan 4 2006, 01:59 PM)Sorr...   Jan 4 2006, 09:07 PM
- - jmknapp   QUOTE (Decepticon @ Jan 4 2006, 02:16 PM)If a...   Jan 5 2006, 04:30 PM
- - Bjorn Jonsson   QUOTE (Decepticon @ Jan 4 2006, 06:16 PM)If a...   Jan 5 2006, 04:57 PM
|- - TritonAntares   Here the planned ISS-observations between january ...   Jan 8 2006, 09:25 PM
|- - TritonAntares   Some additional information: Start UTC __________...   Jan 8 2006, 11:56 PM
- - scalbers   Speaking of Iapetus maps, I'm fine-tuning an u...   Jan 9 2006, 07:42 PM
- - Decepticon   Very Nice!   Jan 10 2006, 12:30 AM
|- - Michael Capobianco   Yes, this map shows the dotted line north of the m...   Jan 10 2006, 01:07 AM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (Michael Capobianco @ Jan 9 2006, 05:07...   Jan 10 2006, 02:22 AM
|- - jmknapp   QUOTE (JRehling @ Jan 9 2006, 10:22 PM)The re...   Jan 10 2006, 11:22 AM
||- - JRehling   QUOTE (jmknapp @ Jan 10 2006, 03:22 AM)The in...   Jan 10 2006, 07:39 PM
|- - scalbers   QUOTE (JRehling @ Jan 10 2006, 02:22 AM)Even ...   Jan 11 2006, 01:18 AM
||- - TritonAntares   QUOTE (scalbers @ Jan 11 2006, 03:18 AM)It lo...   Jan 11 2006, 11:05 AM
||- - JRehling   QUOTE (TritonAntares @ Jan 11 2006, 03:05 AM)...   Jan 12 2006, 05:49 AM
||- - Michael Capobianco   I spent an hour trying to make a stereo image from...   Jan 12 2006, 05:54 PM
|- - Tom Tamlyn   QUOTE (JRehling @ Jan 9 2006, 09:22 PM)A pure...   Jan 12 2006, 04:24 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   Well, during the planning for the primary mission ...   Jan 10 2006, 03:13 AM
- - alan   QUOTE (Michael Capobianco @ Jan 9 2006, 07:07...   Jan 10 2006, 04:20 AM
|- - Michael Capobianco   Very interesting explanation. I'm not convince...   Jan 10 2006, 07:03 PM
- - volcanopele   Another reasonable explanation for bright, polewar...   Jan 10 2006, 07:18 PM
|- - jmknapp   QUOTE (volcanopele @ Jan 10 2006, 03:18 PM)An...   Jan 10 2006, 07:46 PM
|- - volcanopele   QUOTE (jmknapp @ Jan 10 2006, 12:46 PM)Do you...   Jan 10 2006, 08:02 PM
|- - jmknapp   QUOTE (volcanopele @ Jan 10 2006, 04:02 PM)Ga...   Jan 13 2006, 02:16 PM
- - elakdawalla   I listened to a couple of talks at DPS that had be...   Jan 10 2006, 07:58 PM
|- - The Messenger   QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Jan 10 2006, 12:58 PM)I ...   Jan 10 2006, 10:18 PM
|- - tasp   QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Jan 10 2006, 01:58 PM)I ...   Jan 11 2006, 12:36 AM
- - Rob Pinnegar   The notion posted above, regarding Hyperion's ...   Jan 11 2006, 02:24 PM
|- - ugordan   It seems to me thermal conditions on Hyperion...   Jan 11 2006, 02:51 PM
||- - JRehling   QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 11 2006, 06:51 AM)As far...   Jan 11 2006, 09:27 PM
|- - jmknapp   QUOTE (Rob Pinnegar @ Jan 11 2006, 10:24 AM)T...   Jan 12 2006, 01:41 PM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (jmknapp @ Jan 12 2006, 05:41 AM)Rather...   Jan 12 2006, 03:02 PM
- - alan   QUOTE Forgive me, but I'm having a little trou...   Jan 12 2006, 05:05 AM
|- - Tom Tamlyn   QUOTE (alan @ Jan 12 2006, 12:05 AM)CR = Cass...   Jan 13 2006, 03:37 AM
- - tasp   In regards to Hyperion, given the chaotic rotation...   Jan 12 2006, 03:34 PM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (tasp @ Jan 12 2006, 07:34 AM)In regard...   Jan 12 2006, 06:08 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   QUOTE (JRehling @ Jan 12 2006, 06:08 PM)Chaot...   Jan 13 2006, 12:37 PM
- - Phil Stooke   The supposed chaotic rotation of Hyperion was only...   Jan 13 2006, 01:09 PM
- - Rob Pinnegar   A couple of points: (1) Has anyone given much con...   Jan 13 2006, 04:00 PM
|- - ugordan   QUOTE (Rob Pinnegar @ Jan 13 2006, 05:00 PM)F...   Jan 14 2006, 11:00 PM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (Rob Pinnegar @ Jan 13 2006, 08:00 AM)A...   Jan 16 2006, 06:50 PM
|- - TritonAntares   Here some info about the transmission times - name...   Jan 20 2006, 12:32 AM
|- - Rob Pinnegar   QUOTE (JRehling @ Jan 16 2006, 12:50 PM)I can...   Jan 20 2006, 11:47 PM
|- - tasp   QUOTE (Rob Pinnegar @ Jan 20 2006, 05:47 PM)B...   Jan 21 2006, 06:53 AM
|- - Rob Pinnegar   QUOTE (tasp @ Jan 21 2006, 12:53 AM)Possibly ...   Jan 21 2006, 04:34 PM
- - hubdel11   Let's go ! http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/mult...   Jan 21 2006, 06:40 PM
- - Decepticon   Looks like something whizzed by the camera on this...   Jan 21 2006, 07:27 PM
|- - ugordan   QUOTE (Decepticon @ Jan 21 2006, 08:27 PM)Loo...   Jan 21 2006, 07:33 PM
|- - TritonAntares   Two new Iapetus images released. Here is one: ...   Jan 23 2006, 10:46 PM
|- - TritonAntares   Another series of 49 Iapetus images has been relea...   Jan 24 2006, 11:11 PM
|- - ugordan   Check out this Jan 24 image from 954 000 km. What ...   Jan 25 2006, 07:04 PM
|- - TritonAntares   QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 25 2006, 09:04 PM)Check ...   Jan 25 2006, 07:50 PM
|- - TritonAntares   13 new Iapetus images released; one takeout: Date...   Jan 26 2006, 08:12 PM
|- - jmknapp   QUOTE (TritonAntares @ Jan 26 2006, 04:12 PM)...   Jan 27 2006, 03:26 PM
|- - TritonAntares   QUOTE (jmknapp @ Jan 27 2006, 05:26 PM)In pol...   Jan 27 2006, 05:06 PM
|- - nprev   QUOTE (TritonAntares @ Jan 27 2006, 10:06 AM)...   Jan 28 2006, 06:31 AM
||- - tasp   QUOTE (nprev @ Jan 28 2006, 12:31 AM)Iapetus ...   Jan 29 2006, 03:34 AM
||- - TritonAntares   QUOTE (nprev @ Jan 28 2006, 08:31 AM)Is that ...   Jan 29 2006, 10:24 PM
||- - nprev   QUOTE (TritonAntares @ Jan 29 2006, 03:24 PM)...   Jan 29 2006, 10:50 PM
||- - TritonAntares   QUOTE (nprev @ Jan 30 2006, 12:50 AM)Whups...   Jan 30 2006, 12:46 AM
||- - TritonAntares   Another 13 Iapetus cresents released... Two takeo...   Jan 30 2006, 08:57 AM
||- - Rob Pinnegar   QUOTE (TritonAntares @ Jan 29 2006, 06:46 PM)...   Jan 30 2006, 03:17 PM
||- - TritonAntares   QUOTE (Rob Pinnegar @ Jan 30 2006, 05:17 PM)T...   Jan 30 2006, 03:41 PM
|- - jmknapp   QUOTE (TritonAntares @ Jan 27 2006, 01:06 PM)...   Jan 28 2006, 11:52 AM
|- - TritonAntares   Another 13 new Iapetus images released... Two ta...   Jan 29 2006, 05:30 PM
||- - Rob Pinnegar   QUOTE (TritonAntares @ Jan 29 2006, 11:30 AM)...   Jan 29 2006, 05:49 PM
|- - TritonAntares   QUOTE (jmknapp @ Jan 28 2006, 01:52 PM)... I...   Feb 2 2006, 08:17 PM
||- - TritonAntares   Greuti - a member of a german forum - kindly simul...   Feb 3 2006, 11:40 AM
||- - Tman   QUOTE (TritonAntares @ Feb 3 2006, 12:40 PM)G...   Feb 3 2006, 08:25 PM
|- - TritonAntares   QUOTE (jmknapp @ Jan 28 2006, 12:52 PM) ....   Mar 7 2006, 02:23 AM
- - Decepticon   Can that area be associated with the Basin imaged ...   Jan 26 2006, 11:42 PM
|- - Rob Pinnegar   QUOTE (Decepticon @ Jan 26 2006, 05:42 PM)Can...   Jan 27 2006, 12:24 AM
|- - TritonAntares   QUOTE (Decepticon @ Jan 27 2006, 01:42 AM)Can...   Jan 27 2006, 01:02 AM
- - Decepticon   Hogland is gonna have a Hay Day with this. Last w...   Jan 28 2006, 05:04 AM
|- - nprev   QUOTE (Decepticon @ Jan 27 2006, 10:04 PM)Hog...   Jan 28 2006, 06:27 AM
- - Toma B   Here are images from latest non-targeted Iapetus f...   Jan 28 2006, 08:12 AM
- - Decepticon   Cool! I was waiting to see something like that...   Jan 28 2006, 08:18 AM
- - scalbers   Thanks to Toma in post #65 for that great montage....   Jan 28 2006, 09:17 PM
- - nprev   Tasp, you're too kind..thanks! Well, if...   Jan 29 2006, 06:09 AM
- - Rob Pinnegar   One more thing... Take a look at the image of Ia...   Jan 29 2006, 06:21 PM
|- - TritonAntares   QUOTE (Rob Pinnegar @ Jan 29 2006, 08:21 PM)T...   Jan 29 2006, 10:09 PM
- - Phil Stooke   Steve Albers suggested a long time ago that I post...   Jan 30 2006, 01:52 PM
- - Toma B   Here is final version of image covering Iapetus no...   Jan 30 2006, 11:22 PM
|- - tasp   QUOTE (Toma B @ Jan 30 2006, 05:22 PM)Here is...   Jan 31 2006, 12:46 AM
|- - tasp   QUOTE (Toma B @ Jan 30 2006, 05:22 PM)Here is...   Jan 31 2006, 02:32 AM
|- - Rob Pinnegar   QUOTE (tasp @ Jan 30 2006, 08:32 PM)Is it pos...   Jan 31 2006, 03:53 PM
- - scalbers   Here's an Iapetus map update, including the 95...   Feb 1 2006, 12:11 AM
- - Decepticon   I got my fingers crossed for some saturnshine imag...   Mar 7 2006, 03:31 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 04:48 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.