IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Stardust Raw Images Of Wild 2
elakdawalla
post Jan 10 2006, 09:40 PM
Post #1


Bloggette par Excellence
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4503
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



I just created an index page to the 72 raw images captured by Stardust of Wild 2 on the day of the encounter (downloading the original images from the PDS in a jiffy with that wGet software -- what a great innovation):

Stardust Encounter with Wild 2: Raw Image Catalog

As I was working with it to compose more stuff about Wild 2 for our website I realized that all those raw images are flipped left-to-right. Compare this one:

to the maps from the Brownlee et al Science publication:

I am assuming that these (as well as the ones in the Sekanina et al paper that follows it) have the correct orientation.

And yet the most famous picture of Wild 2, the one used for the cover of Science in fact, has not been flipped.


This is really key (and confusing) in part because of the team's names for those big, flat-floored depressions -- Left and Right Foot. Which one's left and which one's right depends on whether the images have been flipped or not!

I'm sure this is not news to people who paid more attention to Stardust when the encounter happened than I did. Does anybody here know anything about why the images in the PDS are flipped?

--Emily


--------------------
My blog - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jan 10 2006, 09:59 PM
Post #2


Administrator
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 13851
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Didnt the Stardust camera employ a mirror to flip the view? Might have had something to do with it. Either they didnt compensate for it when did the press imagery and have for the raw release, or vice-versa.

Looking at this - http://www.nasa.gov/mov/139826main_stardust-trajectory.mov - the spacecraft was overtaken by the comet in a deep-impact style. So, if you were a human spacecraft, with your head 'up' (i.e. standing in the same orientation as one would stood on the north pole of earth) - the comet would have travelled from right to left.

Thus - the early images should have the shadowed side of the comet on the left, and the last images the shadow on the right - or to put it another way - the comet should start with the lighting from the right, and finish with it being lit from the left.

i.e. the sequence as it sits on that (very very good) website is geometrically wrong.

Now - the problem is - you could take an image that appears to be the wrong way round, and either rotate 180 degrees, or flip horez, and have different results. Now - if the PDS released data is as it came from the CCD - then it will need to be flipped left to right.

I think smile.gif

Much kudos on the website - did you do that pulling-of-data-from-PDS headers all by hand ohmy.gif


Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Jan 10 2006, 10:04 PM
Post #3


Bloggette par Excellence
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4503
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



Aha! A mirror! I think you've figured out the puzzle. It did in fact use an articulated scan mirror for pointing -- of course that would produce a mirror-image on the CCD. Too bad they didn't take that out of the PDS release, though I guess what's in the PDS does accurately reflect what hit the CCD.

--Emily


--------------------
My blog - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Jan 10 2006, 10:07 PM
Post #4


Bloggette par Excellence
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4503
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 10 2006, 01:59 PM)
Much kudos on the website - did you do that pulling-of-data-from-PDS headers all by hand ohmy.gif
*

Nope, it all came from the oh-so-wonderful INDEX.TAB file, which can always be found in the INDEX folder in every disk from the PDS. The file consists of tons of columns of data, the significance of which you can discover from inspection of the INDEX.LBL file in the same folder. For grins, I've attached my translation of the Stardust Wild 2 disk's INDEX.LBL file.

I open the INDEX.TAB file in Excel, mess around with it, move columns, play with number formatting, concatenate things together into strings, bring that into Word, split things into paragraphs (Find and Replace is my friend), and then copy and paste the captions I've built into my database-driven image library to make the Web page. Easy as pie smile.gif

--Emily
Attached File(s)
Attached File  stardust_navcam_wild2_index.lbl.txt ( 16.29K ) Number of downloads: 172
 


--------------------
My blog - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Messenger
post Jan 10 2006, 10:27 PM
Post #5


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 624
Joined: 10-August 05
Member No.: 460



QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Jan 10 2006, 02:40 PM)
I am assuming that these (as well as the ones in the Sekanina et al paper that follows it) have the correct orientation.

And yet the most famous picture of Wild 2, the one used for the cover of Science in fact, has not been flipped.


This is really key (and confusing) in part because of the team's names for those big, flat-floored depressions -- Left and Right Foot.  Which one's left and which one's right depends on whether the images have been flipped or not!
--Emily
*

It is even more confusing that that: Megaminors are known to have inverted feet - the heel of the foot is much wider than the ball, so if these are Megaminors footprints, the left foot is indeed the right one wink.gif

Edit: invisible verb
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
machi
post Feb 3 2011, 12:50 PM
Post #6


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 660
Joined: 27-February 08
From: Heart of Europe
Member No.: 4057



Stereo images of Wild 2 comet.
Anaglyph and cross-eye versions.
Wild 2 has arguably wackiest surface of all visited planets, comets and asteroids.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
Attached Image
 


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Feb 3 2011, 03:23 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Really impressive structure, indeed!
Thanks, machi.


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Feb 3 2011, 07:41 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 5809
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Beautiful!

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Mar 12 2012, 03:53 PM
Post #9


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 5809
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Returning to an old thread - I hope that's OK but it seems unnecessary to start a new one.

I have been experimenting with a shaded relief drawing of the nucleus of Wild 2. The coordinate system is from a paper by Duxbury et al.

Starting with this mosaic (labelled with west longitudes):

Attached Image


I tried to interpret it in shaded relief, a bit tricky in places, so I can't guarantee it is right everywhere. Note I'm using east longitudes in the new map.

Attached Image


Attached Image




Phil

(PS - these plus my completed Itokawa photomosaic were just submitted to the PDS Small Bodies Node archive)


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd November 2014 - 09:10 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.