IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Enceladus, Jan. 17
jmknapp
post Jan 17 2006, 01:56 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



Interesting science plan item today (Jan. 17):

CIRS_020EN_FP3MAP001_PRIME

If I read it right, Enceladus, specifically the south polar region, occulted Tethys at 3:23UTC this morning:

QUOTE
BEGIN_TIME: 190729625.184386 (2006 JAN 17 00:26:00 UTC)
END_TIME: 190742465.184390 (2006 JAN 17 04:00:00 UTC)

FP3 disk map of Enceladus. One SI at 01:47 into observation. Length extended to accommodate all ORS instruments. Duration 03:34. Enceladus is above the lighted disk of Saturn for the first 15 or 20 minutes. S/C just below ring plane, EN above, and ring shadow above that. EN passes edge of ring ansa ca. 02:30. Splendid opportunity for wonderful WAC PR image. For CIRS, this will be an excellent opportunity to determine scattered radiation from CIRS primary - i.e., with a semi-infinite IR source surrounding the small (~3 mrad) cold disk of EN as a sharp occulting disk. AD=3.0-3.4, phase=19-24, (-1, 192)-(0, 230); EN south polar region occults TE (AD=1.9) northern hemisphere at 03:24-03:28; perhaps should center FP3 on center of TE from 03:23-03:29 and blink to cover occultation and EN S polar region........


Low-phase though so maybe any plumes would be invisible against Tethys' disk.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 19)
ugordan
post Jan 17 2006, 08:00 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3652
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



I was bored waiting for the perpetual delays on New Horizons launch to end and made 2 Enceladus shots, a R/G/B true color one:
Attached Image

Oops, that one was oriented wrong, sorry about that, fixed now...

Obviously a Kodak-moment shot, R/G/B backdrop of Enceladus against Saturn's disk. Suffers from major compression artifacts, but it's a preview to the official release that's bound to come sometime:
Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Jan 18 2006, 01:43 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



Hey, fits their description of the PR shot exactly--very nice. Now for the Enceladus occultation... but I wonder if the trajectory was changed so that didn't happen. This appears to have been taken in that time interval around 3:20UTC:



http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...7/N00048268.jpg

Missed it by that much....


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jan 18 2006, 10:26 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3652
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (jmknapp @ Jan 18 2006, 02:43 AM)
Missed it by that much....
*

Actually, it most likely didn't miss it at all. The image needs to be rotated 90 degrees clockwise for the north poles to point up. The moon motion is then sideways. It's obvious Enceladus DID occult Tethys at some point, but clearly the camera missed the exact time it happened.
The times for the occultation duration are given as 03:23-03:29. Are those minutes:seconds or hours:minutes? If the former is the case, I'm not at all surprised ISS missed it.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Jan 18 2006, 12:03 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 18 2006, 06:26 AM)
Actually, it most likely didn't miss it at all. The image needs to be rotated 90 degrees clockwise for the north poles to point up. The moon motion is then sideways. It's obvious Enceladus DID occult Tethys at some point, but clearly the camera missed the exact time it happened.
The times for the occultation duration are given as 03:23-03:29. Are those minutes:seconds or hours:minutes? If the former is the case, I'm not at all surprised ISS missed it.
*


It's hh:mm so there seems to have been plenty of time--6 minutes. The intent stated above was to "blink" the camera which I guess means to operate it as fast as possible?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jan 18 2006, 12:20 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3652
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (jmknapp @ Jan 18 2006, 01:03 PM)
It's hh:mm so there seems to have been plenty of time--6 minutes. The intent stated above was to "blink" the camera which I guess means to operate it as fast as possible?
*

I get the impression the "blink" refers to the CIRS instrument while ISS just rides along. And yes, 6 minutes is long enough for at least 6 ISS frames to be taken. I have no idea why they chose not to grasp at the imaging opportunity.
I'm actually surprised the occultation lasted that long, most other mutual events last perhaps less than a minute and here the S/C was near periapse so the perspective should have changed even faster. I guess Enceladus was catching up on Cassini's viewpoint pretty well...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Jan 18 2006, 01:19 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 18 2006, 08:20 AM)
I get the impression the "blink" refers to the CIRS instrument while ISS just rides along.
*


Aha, so maybe they got good data from the CIRS--long wait time on that though.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
um3k
post Jan 18 2006, 05:18 PM
Post #8


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 345
Joined: 2-May 05
Member No.: 372



Here is a super-res color image:
Attached Image


And here is the same image with the color saturation greatly increased:
Attached Image


EDIT: Images rotated so north is at the top. Thanks, volcanopele!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
volcanopele
post Jan 18 2006, 05:24 PM
Post #9


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3242
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



Nice work, um3k and ugordan. North is to the left in the originals so rotating the images 90 deg. CW should put it in them in the right orientation.


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Jan 18 2006, 05:39 PM
Post #10


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



QUOTE (um3k @ Jan 18 2006, 05:18 PM)
Here is a super-res color image:
[attachment=3474:attachment]

And here is the same image with the color saturation greatly increased:
[attachment=3475:attachment]
*

Cannot download.. mad.gif (images not available!)


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
um3k
post Jan 18 2006, 05:40 PM
Post #11


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 345
Joined: 2-May 05
Member No.: 372



QUOTE (dilo @ Jan 18 2006, 12:39 PM)
Cannot download.. mad.gif (images not available!)
*

Try again. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Jan 18 2006, 07:10 PM
Post #12


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



Looks like an extravaganza of high-phase imaging of icy satellites is scheduled today (Jan. 18)--Enceladus, Tethys, Rhea, Mimas, and Dione.

One planned obseration of Enceladus will be like so:



17:20-17:50 ISS_020EN_094W151PH001_PRIME Enceladus spectrophotometry/ phase coverage: Turn -Y to Enceladus; Do 1x1 mosaic 3 clear + 4 NAC color + 9 NAC polarizer + 4 WAC polarizer filters; turn to WP

Looks like pretty good plume-observation geometry, except the disk is small.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Jan 18 2006, 07:11 PM
Post #13


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



QUOTE (um3k @ Jan 18 2006, 05:40 PM)
Try again. smile.gif
*

Thanks, now I see them.
I like color enhancement, however images appear quite defocused... is this due to rescaling? If it is a super-res, how many images did you used?


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
um3k
post Jan 18 2006, 08:28 PM
Post #14


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 345
Joined: 2-May 05
Member No.: 372



QUOTE (dilo @ Jan 18 2006, 02:11 PM)
Thanks, now I see them.
I like color enhancement, however images appear quite defocused... is this due to rescaling? If it is a super-res, how many images did you used?
*

I think I used 5 images. Using any more would have made it even blurrier due to misalignment. I intentionally blurred the color image before combining it with the super-res image in order to reduce JPEG artifacts. The color, by the way, is IR3-GRN-UV3.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Jan 19 2006, 11:49 PM
Post #15


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Wow, look at this new plume image guys!
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...7/N00048586.jpg
Not only plume: Satutrn + rings in shadow+ superexposed rings related!
Cool!


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Decepticon
post Jan 20 2006, 12:24 AM
Post #16


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1279
Joined: 25-November 04
Member No.: 114



Enceladus reminds me of a firecracker when you ignite it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Jan 20 2006, 10:37 PM
Post #17


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



QUOTE (dilo @ Jan 20 2006, 12:49 AM)
Wow, look at this new plume image guys!
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...7/N00048586.jpg
Not only plume: Satutrn + rings in shadow+ superexposed rings related!
Cool!
*


Wowowowowowow!

What a picture!

Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
scalbers
post Jan 21 2006, 05:31 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1688
Joined: 5-March 05
From: Boulder, CO
Member No.: 184



Interpreting this spectacular Enceladus plume and Saturn image is a bit of a head scratcher for me. I attempted to reproduce this in Celestia and I could get the general idea, yet I either had the Enceladus crescent pointing the wrong way, or it was on the wrong side of the rings. Are we looking at the daylight side of Saturn here? We may be looking at the dark side of the rings. Perhaps if I rotate my display this would make sense assuming we are viewing the night side of Saturn (aligning more logically with the Enceladus crescent). I did note that in this case Enceladus was passing behind Saturn.


--------------------
Steve [ my home page and planetary maps page ]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jan 21 2006, 05:47 PM
Post #19


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3652
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (scalbers @ Jan 21 2006, 06:31 PM)
Are we looking at the daylight side of Saturn here? We may be looking at the dark side of the rings.
*

Yes, we seem to be looking at the (overexposed!) night side of Saturn, lit by light reflected off the rings. Whether Cassini is above or below the ring plane is beyond me, but I get the feeling the former is the case.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Jan 21 2006, 09:21 PM
Post #20


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 21 2006, 01:47 PM)
Yes, we seem to be looking at the (overexposed!) night side of Saturn, lit by light reflected off the rings. Whether Cassini is above or below the ring plane is beyond me, but I get the feeling the former is the case.
*


I get a sub-Cassini latitude of 0.2 degrees N, longitude 101W. The subsolar point is 63E, 15S. So the sun would be almost on the opposite side. Time: 18JAN2006 23:42UTC.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 04:54 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.