IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Enceladus, Jan. 17
jmknapp
post Jan 17 2006, 01:56 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



Interesting science plan item today (Jan. 17):

CIRS_020EN_FP3MAP001_PRIME

If I read it right, Enceladus, specifically the south polar region, occulted Tethys at 3:23UTC this morning:

QUOTE
BEGIN_TIME: 190729625.184386 (2006 JAN 17 00:26:00 UTC)
END_TIME: 190742465.184390 (2006 JAN 17 04:00:00 UTC)

FP3 disk map of Enceladus. One SI at 01:47 into observation. Length extended to accommodate all ORS instruments. Duration 03:34. Enceladus is above the lighted disk of Saturn for the first 15 or 20 minutes. S/C just below ring plane, EN above, and ring shadow above that. EN passes edge of ring ansa ca. 02:30. Splendid opportunity for wonderful WAC PR image. For CIRS, this will be an excellent opportunity to determine scattered radiation from CIRS primary - i.e., with a semi-infinite IR source surrounding the small (~3 mrad) cold disk of EN as a sharp occulting disk. AD=3.0-3.4, phase=19-24, (-1, 192)-(0, 230); EN south polar region occults TE (AD=1.9) northern hemisphere at 03:24-03:28; perhaps should center FP3 on center of TE from 03:23-03:29 and blink to cover occultation and EN S polar region........


Low-phase though so maybe any plumes would be invisible against Tethys' disk.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
ugordan
post Jan 17 2006, 08:00 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3652
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



I was bored waiting for the perpetual delays on New Horizons launch to end and made 2 Enceladus shots, a R/G/B true color one:
Attached Image

Oops, that one was oriented wrong, sorry about that, fixed now...

Obviously a Kodak-moment shot, R/G/B backdrop of Enceladus against Saturn's disk. Suffers from major compression artifacts, but it's a preview to the official release that's bound to come sometime:
Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Jan 18 2006, 01:43 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



Hey, fits their description of the PR shot exactly--very nice. Now for the Enceladus occultation... but I wonder if the trajectory was changed so that didn't happen. This appears to have been taken in that time interval around 3:20UTC:



http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/imag...7/N00048268.jpg

Missed it by that much....


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jan 18 2006, 10:26 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3652
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (jmknapp @ Jan 18 2006, 02:43 AM)
Missed it by that much....
*

Actually, it most likely didn't miss it at all. The image needs to be rotated 90 degrees clockwise for the north poles to point up. The moon motion is then sideways. It's obvious Enceladus DID occult Tethys at some point, but clearly the camera missed the exact time it happened.
The times for the occultation duration are given as 03:23-03:29. Are those minutes:seconds or hours:minutes? If the former is the case, I'm not at all surprised ISS missed it.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Jan 18 2006, 12:03 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 18 2006, 06:26 AM)
Actually, it most likely didn't miss it at all. The image needs to be rotated 90 degrees clockwise for the north poles to point up. The moon motion is then sideways. It's obvious Enceladus DID occult Tethys at some point, but clearly the camera missed the exact time it happened.
The times for the occultation duration are given as 03:23-03:29. Are those minutes:seconds or hours:minutes? If the former is the case, I'm not at all surprised ISS missed it.
*


It's hh:mm so there seems to have been plenty of time--6 minutes. The intent stated above was to "blink" the camera which I guess means to operate it as fast as possible?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jan 18 2006, 12:20 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3652
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (jmknapp @ Jan 18 2006, 01:03 PM)
It's hh:mm so there seems to have been plenty of time--6 minutes. The intent stated above was to "blink" the camera which I guess means to operate it as fast as possible?
*

I get the impression the "blink" refers to the CIRS instrument while ISS just rides along. And yes, 6 minutes is long enough for at least 6 ISS frames to be taken. I have no idea why they chose not to grasp at the imaging opportunity.
I'm actually surprised the occultation lasted that long, most other mutual events last perhaps less than a minute and here the S/C was near periapse so the perspective should have changed even faster. I guess Enceladus was catching up on Cassini's viewpoint pretty well...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- jmknapp   Enceladus, Jan. 17   Jan 17 2006, 01:56 PM
- - ugordan   I was bored waiting for the perpetual delays on Ne...   Jan 17 2006, 08:00 PM
|- - jmknapp   Hey, fits their description of the PR shot exactly...   Jan 18 2006, 01:43 AM
|- - ugordan   QUOTE (jmknapp @ Jan 18 2006, 02:43 AM)Missed...   Jan 18 2006, 10:26 AM
|- - jmknapp   QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 18 2006, 06:26 AM)Actual...   Jan 18 2006, 12:03 PM
|- - ugordan   QUOTE (jmknapp @ Jan 18 2006, 01:03 PM)It...   Jan 18 2006, 12:20 PM
|- - jmknapp   QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 18 2006, 08:20 AM)I get ...   Jan 18 2006, 01:19 PM
- - um3k   Here is a super-res color image: And here is the...   Jan 18 2006, 05:18 PM
|- - dilo   QUOTE (um3k @ Jan 18 2006, 05:18 PM)Here is a...   Jan 18 2006, 05:39 PM
|- - um3k   QUOTE (dilo @ Jan 18 2006, 12:39 PM)Cannot do...   Jan 18 2006, 05:40 PM
|- - jmknapp   Looks like an extravaganza of high-phase imaging o...   Jan 18 2006, 07:10 PM
|- - dilo   QUOTE (um3k @ Jan 18 2006, 05:40 PM)Try again...   Jan 18 2006, 07:11 PM
|- - um3k   QUOTE (dilo @ Jan 18 2006, 02:11 PM)Thanks, n...   Jan 18 2006, 08:28 PM
|- - dilo   Wow, look at this new plume image guys! http:/...   Jan 19 2006, 11:49 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (dilo @ Jan 20 2006, 12:49 AM)Wow, look...   Jan 20 2006, 10:37 PM
- - volcanopele   Nice work, um3k and ugordan. North is to the left...   Jan 18 2006, 05:24 PM
- - Decepticon   Enceladus reminds me of a firecracker when you ign...   Jan 20 2006, 12:24 AM
- - scalbers   Interpreting this spectacular Enceladus plume and ...   Jan 21 2006, 05:31 PM
- - ugordan   QUOTE (scalbers @ Jan 21 2006, 06:31 PM)Are w...   Jan 21 2006, 05:47 PM
- - jmknapp   QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 21 2006, 01:47 PM)Yes, w...   Jan 21 2006, 09:21 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 04:54 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.