IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

New Horizon Instrument Capabilities
Tom Tamlyn
post Jan 18 2006, 06:06 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 447
Joined: 1-July 05
From: New York City
Member No.: 424



During the press conference recorded on January 15 (rebroadcasted on NASA TV this morning), several of the New Horizons instruments have been described as the most capable ever carried for a planetary reconnaissance. For "reconnaissance" I guess we should understand "fly-by," i.e., the instruments are more powerful than those carried by the Pioneers & Voyagers.

It would be interesting to learn how they compare with the corresponding instruments on Cassini & Galileo, with their much higher payloads.

TTT

Edit: I just heard Craig Covault from Aviation Week catch this issue, but he didn't pursue the comparison beyond Voyager & Pioneer.

This post has been edited by Tom Tamlyn: Jan 18 2006, 06:08 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
ljk4-1
post Jan 20 2006, 10:21 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2454
Joined: 8-July 05
From: NGC 5907
Member No.: 430



A What If group of questions:

Suppose that in 1980, NASA/JPL, realizing that they could not penetrate the clouds of Titan or even hope to see any surface through gaps in the clouds (and even if they could have, no doubt it would have left everyone seriously confused), had redirected Voyager 1 to flyby Pluto around 1990.

In addition to the fact that we would have long known about a few more moons of Pluto besides Charon, what do you think would have been changed/modified/ replaced on New Horizons had the Voyager 1 flyby taken place? Would Voyager 1 been up to the task at all? I remember its images were not quite as sharp as Voyager 2's.

Would NH even exist if Voyager 1 had explored Pluto?

Do you think Pluto will be all that different from Triton - besides the fact that it won't have a big blue world in the background?


--------------------
"After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance.
I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard,
and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does
not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is
indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have
no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft."

- Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Jan 20 2006, 11:09 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2559
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (ljk4-1 @ Jan 20 2006, 02:21 PM)
Would NH even exist if Voyager 1 had explored Pluto?

*


Clearly the NH payload is much more capable than Voyager's. That said, I don't think NH would have flown if Voyager 1 had visited Pluto, assuming that it had worked as well as Voyager 2 did at Neptune. We would have 1 km resolution visible color images of the illuminated faces of Pluto/Charon and probably some occultation data (I'm not sure that IRIS could have gotten anything useful.) That would have made spending the NH budget on " just another flyby" a pretty hard sell.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 04:16 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.