IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Curious Phenomena In Shuttle Launches
ugordan
post Jan 25 2006, 09:34 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3652
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



One thing has been bugging me for a while now. There's a curious feature that appears in many shuttle launch videos (well, not only shuttle videos, but they're most prominent there). I'm talking about the following optical effects:
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image


Now, my sort-of-educated guess would be this is a shockwave related phenomenon. Once the launch vehicle becomes supersonic, it creates a shockwave that compresses air at its front. This changes the index of refraction if the shocking is strong enough.
The same thing happens during an atmospheric nuclear detonation where the shock can be seen "breaking" the traces of the smoke rockets behind the detonation (in case you ever wondered what the smoke rockets were for smile.gif)
Attached Image


I don't think it's related to optics in the tracker. Notice how the linear refraction is always perpendicular to the motion of the shuttle. What puzzles me is just how many of these linear features there are during the course of the liftoff. Furthermore, they seem to dance around each other exhibiting complex behavior one would not expect of a simple supersonic shock front...

Very interesting in any case, if anyone has more info about it, I'd be happy to hear it.
BTW, the launch video I took the screenshots from can be found at www.insideksc.com, specifically here.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
tasp
post Jan 26 2006, 02:27 AM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 903
Joined: 30-January 05
Member No.: 162



The many protuberences of the shuttle (wings, OMS pods, rudder) all contribute to the multiple complex shock waves coming off the vehicle.



If I may be permitted (if this isn't too far off the topic), it seems about every launch I have watched closely, I will see a 'flare' or two in the shuttle main engine exhaust.

IIRC, they were even looked into during the Challenger accident investigation and were deemed 'acceptable' or some such thing.

But I have never seen anywhere, just what is it that causes them.

Tiny bits of turbine or bearings working there way through the plumbing? That sounds too scary to me to be correct.

It doesn't seem possible for there to be impurities in the fuel or oxidizer.

So does anyone know what makes the flares?

(incinerated pigeons caught in the exhaust? - that one is a joke)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jan 26 2006, 08:15 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3652
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (tasp @ Jan 26 2006, 03:27 AM)
So does anyone know what makes the flares?
*

I'm not sure what flares you have in mind, but I remember a recent study that announced that every shuttle launch brought a significant amount of water vapor over the south pole or something like that. I also clearly remember iron dust being mentioned as an additional exhaust product, apart from H2O.
Supposedly, the engine wears itself out ever so slowly, but enough to detect these trace amounts.
Is there a flare visible in the specific clip I linked above? If so, at what time?

While we're off-topic, there is a Proton launch (just about the only one I have in my collection) that also exhibited a flare at an early stage of liftoff. It gave out a red flash to an otherwise blue exhaust plume.

Also off-topic, notice how the bottom of the fuel tank insulation gradually gets charred. Is this due to infrared radiation from the engines or do some of the exhaust gases actually make it all the way up there and burn the foam?
The burn pattern looks pretty sharply defined so I'd bet on gas circulation. Which puzzles me - how can gas come back up when the whole vehicle is going supersonic and the air is dragging everything downwards? Must be one hell of a turbulence!


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tty
post Jan 26 2006, 02:03 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 688
Joined: 20-April 05
From: Sweden
Member No.: 273



QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 26 2006, 10:15 AM)
Also off-topic, notice how the bottom of the fuel tank insulation gradually gets charred. Is this due to infrared radiation from the engines or do some of the exhaust gases actually make it all the way up there and burn the foam?
The burn pattern looks pretty sharply defined so I'd bet on gas circulation. Which puzzles me - how can gas come back up when the whole vehicle is going supersonic and the air is dragging everything downwards? Must be one hell of a turbulence!
*


There is certain to be an area of flow separation and turbulent flow behind the fuel tank and with this very complex geometry and pressure distribution I wouldn't be in the least surprised by some "wrong-way" flow. Stranger things happen. There have even been cases where dropped bombs simply refuse to leave and fly along with the aircraft until the speed drops below a certain point!

tty
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GregM
post Jan 26 2006, 05:27 PM
Post #5


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 123
Joined: 21-February 05
Member No.: 175



QUOTE (tty @ Jan 26 2006, 02:03 PM)
There is certain to be an area of flow separation and turbulent flow behind the fuel tank and with this very complex geometry and pressure distribution I wouldn't be in the least surprised by some "wrong-way" flow.
*



Wrong way flow? Were's a good example:

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/ap11-KSC-69PC-413HR.jpg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- ugordan   Curious Phenomena In Shuttle Launches   Jan 25 2006, 09:34 PM
- - The Messenger   I'm guessing that you are half right: That the...   Jan 25 2006, 10:07 PM
|- - ugordan   QUOTE (The Messenger @ Jan 25 2006, 11:07 PM)...   Jan 25 2006, 10:23 PM
|- - The Messenger   QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 25 2006, 03:23 PM)I have...   Jan 26 2006, 05:28 PM
|- - DDAVIS   [quote=The Messenger,Jan 26 2006, 05:28 PM] They d...   Jan 28 2006, 12:15 AM
|- - DDAVIS   message moved to new thread   Jan 28 2006, 12:17 AM
- - dvandorn   I've seen that artifact many times -- it even ...   Jan 25 2006, 11:14 PM
- - tasp   The many protuberences of the shuttle (wings, OMS ...   Jan 26 2006, 02:27 AM
|- - ugordan   QUOTE (tasp @ Jan 26 2006, 03:27 AM)So does a...   Jan 26 2006, 08:15 AM
|- - helvick   Just to clarify what I think is being discussed: ...   Jan 26 2006, 01:33 PM
|- - tty   QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 26 2006, 10:15 AM)Also o...   Jan 26 2006, 02:03 PM
|- - paxdan   QUOTE (tty @ Jan 26 2006, 02:03 PM)Stranger t...   Jan 26 2006, 02:52 PM
|- - GregM   QUOTE (tty @ Jan 26 2006, 02:03 PM)There is c...   Jan 26 2006, 05:27 PM
- - edstrick   I've seen the straight line "oddities...   Jan 28 2006, 09:53 AM
|- - ugordan   QUOTE (edstrick @ Jan 28 2006, 10:53 AM)The a...   Jan 28 2006, 11:14 AM
|- - Bob Shaw   I'd say that the bright lines and spikes are c...   Jan 28 2006, 02:23 PM
|- - ugordan   QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Jan 28 2006, 03:23 PM)I...   Jan 28 2006, 04:46 PM
|- - helvick   QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 28 2006, 05:46 PM)I coul...   Jan 28 2006, 07:00 PM
|- - ugordan   Sorry for resurrecting a long-dead thread, but I...   Nov 6 2007, 08:43 PM
- - djellison   Personally, I think these are shock waves. Very s...   Jan 28 2006, 10:18 AM
- - helvick   Seems like pretty compelling evidence that what we...   Nov 6 2007, 09:50 PM
- - stevesliva   Made me think of "vapor cones" http://en...   Nov 6 2007, 10:36 PM
|- - ugordan   Nope, Prandtl-Glauert singularities have a very na...   Nov 6 2007, 10:49 PM
- - stevesliva   Neat! Conclusively something else.   Nov 6 2007, 11:07 PM
- - helvick   Seems to be an attached supersonic shock wave made...   Nov 6 2007, 11:28 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 03:14 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.