My Assistant
![]() ![]() |
Horizon, Ain't what it used to be |
Jan 30 2006, 02:24 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 147 Joined: 30-June 05 From: Bristol, UK Member No.: 423 |
As posted elsewhere...
I can't get through an episode of Horizon without leaving the room muttering under my breath about Pseudo Science, Stupid camera angles and Sensationalism. Is it just me? Nick (Grumpy old man |
|
|
|
Jan 30 2006, 02:31 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2488 Joined: 17-April 05 From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK Member No.: 239 |
QUOTE (Ames @ Jan 30 2006, 03:24 PM) As posted elsewhere... I can't get through an episode of Horizon without leaving the room muttering under my breath about Pseudo Science, Stupid camera angles and Sensationalism. Is it just me? Nick (Grumpy old man Nick: Yes - once it was a 'must watch' whatever the topic, but no longer. I have a suspicion that the bulk of it is Nova or Discovery channel remoulds these days, just with UK voiceovers. Bob Shaw -------------------- Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
|
|
|
|
Jan 31 2006, 07:54 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 356 Joined: 12-March 05 Member No.: 190 |
So what do you think of NOVA? I downl^H^H^H^H^H uhhh saw somewhere...an episode of Horizon on bubblefusion and I thought it was actually pretty good. On the other hand, since I get NOVA free on PBS over here and I get to see most of them, I really think ITS gone downhill. ScienceNOW with the ever annoying Robert Krulwitch is just insulting and when NOVA actually does decide to cover hard science its pointless (with the exception of the rover specials which were very good). The last example of which that I recall was watching Brian Greene sit in a CG set called the "quantum cafe" where ice cubes demonstrate Heisenberg uncertainty. gag. It seems like most of the shows done now are on archaeology and the animal world. Which is fine to a point but if I watch one more mummy/shark/pyramids/aligator/iceman special I think I'm gonna friggin loose it.
|
|
|
|
Jan 31 2006, 02:47 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
The one that's gone too far over on this side of the pond is a series on The History Channel entitled "Modern Marvels." When that series started, you had some very nice looks at fascinating elements of our modern-day infrastructures -- but they seem to have run out of truly "marvelous" topics, and now they're just reaching.
For example, a few of their latest topics have been cement, gasoline and basements. I wouldn't be surprised if their next topic turned out to be cow dung. It was a good show, but I think they need to retire the show and move on... -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
| Guest_PhilCo126_* |
Jan 31 2006, 05:58 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Guests |
Well, if we're talking BBC documentaries of the HORIZON series, I have to say those are great, remember:
1. Destination Mars 2. Saturn - lord of the rings 3. Titan - a place like home ? I have those on VHS and will transfer to DVD soon as those were 'superb' documentaries ! |
|
|
|
Jan 31 2006, 08:01 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
I recently watched a tape I have of a Nova episode from 1988, "Death of a Star", about the famous Supernova 1987A. Even then the narration and information presentation was much more straightforward and far less flashy than it is now. There was far less music and more talking by the various scientists themselves. It was almost a surprise compared to what we've been given since then.
I am of two minds on the way science programs are presented these days. Of course the public has to be enticed to watch, a public that has been indoctrinated since roughly the birth of MTV with fast cuts, sound bites, and increasingly flashier graphics. Sometimes this can be put to good use and enhance a program in terms of making the material comprehensive. Then again, it has the drawback of making education "have to be" entertaining, otherwise it is not considered worth watching. I see this in my two young sons, who have to be "entertained" to learn anywhere outside of school. Video games and Yu-Gi-Oh! rule their worlds. Or is this normal for kids their age? Of course the frightening alternative is no educational science program at all. And don't expect the networks to try and fill in such gaps on their own without a public outcry from folks like us. One semi-relevant tidbit I remember from an early 1976 Nova program on the planets: At the very end, they added the "recently" released image of the surface of Venus from Venera 9 as an addendum, because it happened after the main program was made. I had seen the image before in the New York Times, but it was still a very cool surprise to see and has stuck with me more than the rest of that program ever since. This was months before the Viking landings on Mars. -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
|
Jan 31 2006, 10:16 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14445 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
I think British documentary making for our subject peaked with 'The Planets' - it's gone very downhill ever sicne. 'Space' was terrible, and the recent 'Voyage..' was more drama and documentary.
Doug |
|
|
|
Feb 2 2006, 04:07 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
SCIENCE ON TELEVISION (Science Show: 28/01/2006)
Veteran science producer Dick Gilling, who worked for many years at the BBC and with the ABC in the early days of our science broadcasting, asks why the quality of science programs on television has declined. http://www.abc.net.au/rn/science/ss/stories/s1555286.htm -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
|
Feb 2 2006, 04:50 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 147 Joined: 30-June 05 From: Bristol, UK Member No.: 423 |
ljk4-1 - Good find!
PhilCo126 - Yes they can still do it sometimes. I think the dumbing down of Science Documentary in the search of viewing figures is inevitable in the commercial world that IS most of the media. *But* The BBC is (and SHOULD) be different because it is a mandatory subscription service. In the UK we each pay £126 per year for its output. It has at its core a "Public Service Charter" which defines its public service role. It should therefore be able to make "Quality" Science programs that are not crippled by the need to attract an audience with no interest in science. It shouldn't be about viewing figures, well not totally anyhoo. It has come to the point where the "show" is so watered down, that yes, it's is nice eye-candy for the masses but carries no scientific message, just a sensational "Oh my god the world is gonna blow up", or "There's a asteroid out there with my name on it" Nick |
|
|
|
Feb 2 2006, 06:16 PM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2488 Joined: 17-April 05 From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK Member No.: 239 |
The best BBC science reporting, IMHO, is now on the wireless. 'Material World', for example, on the Home Service (well, that's what it says on *my* radio). The pictures are much better, too!
Bob Shaw -------------------- Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
|
|
|
|
| Guest_PhilCo126_* |
Feb 3 2006, 08:33 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Guests |
Well Doug is certainly right on what he said on ' The Planets ' ... Pardon me saying but BBC made that documentary in a good period ... for instance they managed to interview Dr Gerry SOFFEN, one of my childhood 'heroes' of unmanned spaceflight ( as a 10-year old I managed to write to and get photos of Dr Charlie HALL, Dr Carl SAGAN, Dr Gerry SOFFEN, Dr Gentry LEE and others and unfortunately most have deceased ... )
The 2 'HORIZON' docus on Cassini were superb ( see my post above ) |
|
|
|
| Guest_PhilCo126_* |
Feb 9 2006, 05:12 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Guests |
This Thursday 09 Feb 2006 evening another space-related Horizon about Black Matter in space ...
|
|
|
|
| Guest_PhilCo126_* |
Feb 11 2006, 04:04 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Guests |
Well I guess the comments were correct as the latest HORIZON was filmed in a completely ' new style ' ... really prefered the earlier style
|
|
|
|
Feb 21 2006, 10:05 PM
Post
#14
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 356 Joined: 12-March 05 Member No.: 190 |
FYI to other yanks on the board
|
|
|
|
Feb 21 2006, 10:30 PM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
FYI to other yanks on the board Yes, see here: http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...indpost&p=42141 -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th October 2024 - 02:25 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|