My Assistant
Mro On Approach, TCM-3 not required |
Feb 3 2006, 11:06 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 134 Joined: 13-March 05 Member No.: 191 |
MRO has shifted from the cruise phase to Approach phase. Apparently, the trajectory is so good that TCM-3 was cancelled. This is good news for the prospects for a long life for MRO supporting future missions. TCM-4 is on Feb 28, and MOI on March 10. Only 5 weeks away!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Feb 27 2006, 07:10 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1870 Joined: 20-February 05 Member No.: 174 |
With apollo, for both orbit insertion and trans-earth-insertion burns, there were 2 important times. The times of expected AOS <acquisition of signal>times: for 1.) if the engine burn did not occur, and for 2.) If the engine burn did occur.
On orbit insertion, a no-burn signal would be early.. an improper burn later, a nominal burn at a specific time.. and an overburn or kablooie if no signal shortly after the optimum burn time. On TEI, a nominal burn gets you back into view early, as you've sped up in orbit. To some extent, the same will apply here. If AOS is within a few tens of seconds of the expected time, it's likely we're in a good orbit. |
|
|
|
Feb 27 2006, 03:32 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1465 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Columbus OH USA Member No.: 13 |
Does anyone know which DSN stations and/or other facilities will be listening for MRO's signal as it emerges from behind Mars at 22:16UTC on March 10th? Which one will likely be the first to report the signal?
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Feb 27 2006, 07:07 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1636 Joined: 9-May 05 From: Lima, Peru Member No.: 385 |
Does anyone know which DSN stations and/or other facilities will be listening for MRO's signal as it emerges from behind Mars at 22:16UTC on March 10th? Which one will likely be the first to report the signal? I am thinking about why any of three present Mars Orbiters, ODY, MGS and MEX aren't capable as a relay of any signal from a new member MRO to Earth and viceversa? The rovers might be the witnesers with their PANCAM. Not sure about its proper localization at the MOI critical moments. I think there's some confusion. The aimpoint altitude at MOI is 400 km, not anything lower. After MCO, they're unlikely to try anything much lower. Maybe, the space portal: spaceflightnow is confused. Below is the extract: To take full advantage of atmospheric braking, the low point of the orbit will be carefully reduced to around 62 miles (100 km). It will be raised, or "walked out," later, with the ultimate goal being a roughly circular orbit with a high point of at most 199 miles (320 km) and a low point as close as 158 miles (254 km) to the surface. http://www.spaceflightnow.com/mars/mro/060224moipreview.html Rodolfo |
|
|
|
Feb 27 2006, 07:46 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2559 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
Maybe, the space portal: spaceflightnow is confused. You're quoting the altitude during aerobraking, not the altitude at MOI, which is much higher. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
|
Redstone Mro On Approach Feb 3 2006, 11:06 PM
RNeuhaus Good news. I seems that MRO has started to gain it... Feb 4 2006, 04:41 AM
ugordan QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Feb 4 2006, 05:41 AM)I seem... Feb 4 2006, 12:13 PM
jmknapp QUOTE (ugordan @ Feb 4 2006, 07:13 AM) As... Feb 15 2006, 01:19 PM
jmknapp PS: Does anyone know what the field-of-view and re... Feb 15 2006, 02:28 PM
abalone QUOTE (Redstone @ Feb 4 2006, 10:06 AM)MRO ha... Feb 4 2006, 12:49 PM
djellison It's odd to think that from 'aboe' - M... Feb 4 2006, 03:19 PM
SFJCody How many pixels would HiRise get across the disc o... Feb 4 2006, 03:50 PM
mcaplinger QUOTE (SFJCody @ Feb 4 2006, 07:50 AM)How man... Feb 4 2006, 05:26 PM
djellison This is from a little PDF I found at the same plac... Feb 4 2006, 05:41 PM
crabbsaline QUOTE (djellison @ Feb 4 2006, 12:41 PM)This ... Feb 7 2006, 11:11 AM
djellison I think they're using the ONC more as a tech-d... Feb 7 2006, 11:57 AM
djellison http://bookstore.spie.org/index.cfm?fuseac...d=619... Feb 15 2006, 02:35 PM
jmknapp QUOTE (djellison @ Feb 15 2006, 09:35 AM)... Feb 15 2006, 03:52 PM
Bob Shaw From the MRO website:
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mr... Feb 15 2006, 07:29 PM
jmknapp I made an animation of the approach through the fi... Feb 16 2006, 03:35 PM
djellison Given the addition of some post-moi-pre-aerobrakin... Feb 16 2006, 03:46 PM
jmknapp QUOTE (djellison @ Feb 16 2006, 10:46 AM)... Feb 16 2006, 05:00 PM
mcaplinger QUOTE (jmknapp @ Feb 16 2006, 09:00 AM) L... Feb 16 2006, 05:34 PM
jmknapp QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Feb 16 2006, 12:34 PM... Feb 16 2006, 06:03 PM
helvick QUOTE (jmknapp @ Feb 16 2006, 06:03 PM) W... Feb 16 2006, 06:30 PM
mcaplinger QUOTE (jmknapp @ Feb 16 2006, 10:03 AM) W... Feb 16 2006, 10:14 PM
jmknapp QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Feb 16 2006, 05:14 PM... Feb 16 2006, 10:42 PM
mcaplinger QUOTE (jmknapp @ Feb 16 2006, 02:42 PM) I... Feb 16 2006, 11:31 PM
jmknapp QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Feb 16 2006, 06:31 PM... Feb 17 2006, 02:00 AM
mcaplinger QUOTE (jmknapp @ Feb 16 2006, 06:00 PM) H... Feb 17 2006, 04:05 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Feb 17 2006, 04:05 AM... Feb 17 2006, 12:18 PM
AlexBlackwell QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Feb 17 2006, 12:18 PM) ... Feb 17 2006, 06:13 PM
jmknapp QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Feb 17 2006, 01:13... Feb 17 2006, 06:28 PM

AlexBlackwell QUOTE (jmknapp @ Feb 17 2006, 06:28 PM) B... Feb 17 2006, 06:34 PM

elakdawalla QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Feb 17 2006, 10:34... Feb 17 2006, 06:36 PM

AlexBlackwell QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Feb 17 2006, 06:36 P... Feb 17 2006, 06:50 PM
mcaplinger QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Feb 17 2006, 10:13... Feb 17 2006, 07:50 PM
AlexBlackwell QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Feb 17 2006, 07:50 PM... Feb 17 2006, 08:06 PM

djellison QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Feb 17 2006, 08:06... Feb 17 2006, 08:09 PM

RNeuhaus QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Feb 17 2006, 03:06... Feb 17 2006, 10:55 PM
jmknapp QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Feb 17 2006, 02:50 PM... Feb 17 2006, 09:39 PM
ElkGroveDan QUOTE (jmknapp @ Feb 17 2006, 09:39 PM) F... Feb 17 2006, 11:06 PM
Sunspot I kept reading that they wouldn't be doing any... Feb 16 2006, 05:15 PM
Phil Stooke It wouldn't be targeted, just whatever they ar... Feb 16 2006, 06:49 PM
babakm Some imaging of Phoenix candidate site D is on the... Feb 16 2006, 07:05 PM
RNeuhaus Below is the Sout Pole Cap that looks different th... Feb 16 2006, 07:10 PM
brianc A nice article about the MRO HIRISE camera syst... Feb 16 2006, 08:00 PM
djellison Thing is - only a tiny tiny change in the altitiud... Feb 17 2006, 12:47 PM
Phil Stooke Emily: "I guess no joke is too old and tired... Feb 17 2006, 06:58 PM
lyford QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Feb 17 2006, 10:58 A... Feb 17 2006, 08:06 PM
dvandorn QUOTE (lyford @ Feb 17 2006, 02:06 PM) It... Feb 18 2006, 12:57 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (dvandorn @ Feb 18 2006, 12:57 AM) ... Feb 18 2006, 01:06 AM
djellison Being VERY unscientific, approx speed at periareio... Feb 17 2006, 09:59 PM
Bob Shaw The way I see it, almost *any* orbit is better tha... Feb 17 2006, 10:46 PM
AlexBlackwell QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Feb 17 2006, 10:46 PM) ... Feb 17 2006, 10:52 PM
AlexBlackwell Feb. 17, 2006
Dwayne Brown/Erica Hupp
Headquarter... Feb 17 2006, 10:25 PM
dvandorn I think it's probably safest to blame it all o... Feb 18 2006, 01:19 AM
yaohua2000 Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter was only 5 million kil... Feb 19 2006, 01:12 AM
RNeuhaus After reading more details about MRO. I found it m... Feb 19 2006, 06:14 AM
djellison [quote name='RNeuhaus' post='42269' date='Feb 19 2... Feb 19 2006, 09:32 AM
helvick QUOTE (djellison @ Feb 19 2006, 09:32 AM)... Feb 19 2006, 10:57 AM
The Messenger Nice collection of details. Hydrazine (HN#NH) has ... Feb 19 2006, 06:35 AM
dilo Thanks for resuming all these infos, Rodolfo (perh... Feb 19 2006, 07:50 AM
deglr6328 QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Feb 19 2006, 06:14 AM) ... Feb 19 2006, 10:46 AM
Airbag Another interesting tidbit - MRO uses the same X-b... Feb 19 2006, 07:26 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (Airbag @ Feb 19 2006, 07:26 PM) An... Feb 19 2006, 09:41 PM
belleraphon1 QUOTE (Airbag @ Feb 19 2006, 02:26 PM) An... Feb 20 2006, 12:51 AM
Myran QUOTE Bob Shaw said Am I alone in thinking that th... Feb 19 2006, 11:03 PM
djellison I imagine that a spacecraft that notices a signal ... Feb 19 2006, 11:07 PM
Steve QUOTE (djellison @ Feb 19 2006, 06:07 PM)... Feb 19 2006, 11:27 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (Steve @ Feb 19 2006, 11:27 PM) Ass... Feb 19 2006, 11:40 PM
djellison I was thinking that, I imagine they can sequence t... Feb 19 2006, 11:42 PM
edstrick On it's second lunar day, JPL tried to get Sur... Feb 20 2006, 06:08 AM
ugordan Don't the DSN uplink commands have a sort of d... Feb 20 2006, 08:27 AM
edstrick I think we're dealing with paleolithic technol... Feb 20 2006, 08:46 AM
Airbag QUOTE (edstrick @ Feb 20 2006, 03:46 AM) ... Feb 20 2006, 07:22 PM
Bob Shaw Can I patent interplanetary MAC addresses - they c... Feb 20 2006, 10:18 PM
helvick QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Feb 20 2006, 10:18 PM) ... Feb 21 2006, 12:08 AM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (helvick @ Feb 21 2006, 12:08 AM) I... Feb 21 2006, 11:16 AM
helvick QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Feb 21 2006, 11:16 AM) ... Feb 21 2006, 02:19 PM
mcaplinger QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Feb 21 2006, 03:16 AM) ... Feb 21 2006, 02:39 PM
Myran QUOTE Airbag said: Change Opportunity's antenn... Feb 20 2006, 10:40 PM
djellison As I understand it - spacecraft are all moving ver... Feb 21 2006, 03:27 PM
Toma B Is there any planed imaging with HiRISE on approac... Feb 24 2006, 07:47 AM
ugordan There's always a good reason for not performin... Feb 24 2006, 08:06 AM
djellison --><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(T... Feb 24 2006, 08:27 AM
Sunspot The same was done with Cassini during the week or ... Feb 24 2006, 09:38 AM
AlexBlackwell The MRO arrival press kit is now up:
Mars Reconna... Feb 24 2006, 04:35 PM
mcaplinger QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Feb 24 2006, 08:35... Feb 26 2006, 06:06 PM
djellison And the press conf is in an hour and a bit as well... Feb 24 2006, 04:53 PM
jmknapp QUOTE (djellison @ Feb 24 2006, 11:53 AM)... Feb 25 2006, 03:29 PM
RNeuhaus The MRO spacecraft will remain out of contact for ... Feb 26 2006, 06:27 PM
The Messenger QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Feb 26 2006, 11:27 AM) ... Feb 27 2006, 04:17 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Feb 26 2006, 06:27 PM) ... Feb 27 2006, 04:21 PM
djellison Of course - the reason for having such a low targe... Feb 27 2006, 04:28 PM
jmknapp QUOTE (djellison @ Feb 27 2006, 11:28 AM)... Feb 27 2006, 04:50 PM
mcaplinger QUOTE (djellison @ Feb 27 2006, 08:28 AM)... Feb 27 2006, 04:54 PM
djellison Stanford was listening to MER because MER was also... Feb 27 2006, 04:53 PM
djellison Ahh - someone mis-quoted the press pdf previously ... Feb 27 2006, 05:01 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (djellison @ Feb 27 2006, 05:01 PM)... Feb 27 2006, 05:11 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 04:17 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|