IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Hi-res Mars Maps?
jmknapp
post Feb 16 2006, 06:43 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



What is the highest resolution Mars map available, preferably color?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Phil Stooke
post Feb 16 2006, 06:46 PM
Post #2


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10265
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



More info needed! MOLA topography? Approximately true surface color and albedo? Both combined? Did you want digital, or a published paper map? Does the projection matter?

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Feb 16 2006, 06:57 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Feb 16 2006, 01:46 PM) *
More info needed! MOLA topography? Approximately true surface color and albedo? Both combined? Did you want digital, or a published paper map? Does the projection matter?

Phil


Something along the lines of the MGS/MOC or the Mars Express visual camera. Digital, cylindrical projection.

MSSS has a very hi-res map in black and white. The MSSS web site says they are working on a color version, and some kind of combined MOC/MOLA, but I think that hasn't happened--at least I couldn't find them there.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Feb 17 2006, 12:26 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2559
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (jmknapp @ Feb 16 2006, 10:57 AM) *
MSSS has a very hi-res map in black and white. The MSSS web site says they are working on a color version, and some kind of combined MOC/MOLA, but I think that hasn't happened--at least I couldn't find them there.


That's true, we haven't completed that. Our MRO, MSL and LRO work has cut into the hobby time I used to make the B&W mosaics, and the color mosaics are much more labor-intensive to make.

http://www.arcscience.com/face.htm has a colorized Mars map, but it appears to be a commercial product.


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Feb 20 2006, 03:15 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Feb 16 2006, 07:26 PM) *
That's true, we haven't completed that. Our MRO, MSL and LRO work has cut into the hobby time I used to make the B&W mosaics, and the color mosaics are much more labor-intensive to make.


I'm curious as to why the gap in the data between 60-65S? something to do with the geometry of the MGS orbit?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mcaplinger
post Feb 20 2006, 03:55 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2559
Joined: 13-September 05
Member No.: 497



QUOTE (jmknapp @ Feb 19 2006, 07:15 PM) *
I'm curious as to why the gap in the data between 60-65S? something to do with the geometry of the MGS orbit?


The basemap used for the mosaic (a hand mosaic of global map swaths) wasn't useful south of 60S. While the actual Geodesy Campaign data goes down to 65S (it was taken during southern winter so areas south of there were in darkness), the basemap control rendered the area between 60S and 65S too dark to use. And the south polar coverage we took later started at 65S.

This could all be reprocessed and fixed, and it's on my list of things to do, but not very close to the top.
The gap was fixed for the "Mars Atlas" but that was only produced at 64 pix/deg -- see http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/moc_atlas/


--------------------
Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- jmknapp   Hi-res Mars Maps?   Feb 16 2006, 06:43 PM
- - Phil Stooke   More info needed! MOLA topography? Approxima...   Feb 16 2006, 06:46 PM
|- - jmknapp   QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Feb 16 2006, 01:46 P...   Feb 16 2006, 06:57 PM
|- - mcaplinger   QUOTE (jmknapp @ Feb 16 2006, 10:57 AM) M...   Feb 17 2006, 12:26 AM
|- - jmknapp   QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Feb 16 2006, 07:26 PM...   Feb 17 2006, 01:36 PM
|- - jmknapp   QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Feb 16 2006, 07:26 PM...   Feb 20 2006, 03:15 AM
|- - mcaplinger   QUOTE (jmknapp @ Feb 19 2006, 07:15 PM) I...   Feb 20 2006, 03:55 PM
- - Phil Stooke   Try this: ftp://ftpflag.wr.usgs.gov/dist/pigpen/m...   Feb 16 2006, 07:39 PM
- - djellison   There used to be a 20k wide map at maps.jpl.nasa.g...   Feb 17 2006, 02:11 PM
|- - Bjorn Jonsson   What would be particularly interesting (at least f...   Feb 17 2006, 04:50 PM
- - vikingmars   Here is your link for Mars maps to download : http...   Feb 22 2006, 05:05 PM
|- - jmknapp   QUOTE (vikingmars @ Feb 22 2006, 12:05 PM...   Feb 24 2006, 03:07 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (jmknapp @ Feb 24 2006, 03:07 PM) T...   Feb 24 2006, 05:27 PM
|- - jmknapp   The THEMIS IR images from Odyssey seem very detail...   Mar 6 2006, 11:50 AM
- - Phil Stooke   Not yet but will be. http://astrogeology.usgs.gov...   Mar 6 2006, 02:03 PM
- - jmknapp   QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Mar 6 2006, 09:03 AM...   Mar 6 2006, 05:11 PM
- - mcaplinger   QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Mar 6 2006, 06:03 AM...   Mar 6 2006, 05:38 PM
- - jmknapp   QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Mar 6 2006, 12:38 PM)...   Mar 6 2006, 07:20 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 04:17 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.