My Assistant
Scientists Solve the Mystery of Methane in Titan's Atmosphere |
| Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Mar 1 2006, 07:07 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Guests |
Scientists Solve the Mystery of Methane in Titan's Atmosphere
By Lori Stiles, UANews.org March 1, 2006 Scientists Solve the Mystery of Methane in Titan's Atmosphere By Lori Stiles, UANews.org March 1, 2006 This refers to the Tobie et al. paper in the March 2, 2006, issue of Nature. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Mar 2 2006, 12:55 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3242 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
We may have at least a preliminary answer to one of their test very soon thanks to Monday's Titan pass that included some Radio Science doppler experiments. From the paper:
"If a subsurface ammonia–water ocean and a rocky core are present, as predicted by our model, Titan's tidal secondary potential Love number k2 should be higher than 0.3 and its moment of inertia factor C/MR2 should be lower than 0.33; these quantities should be measured by the Radio Science Subsystem later in the mission" -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
|
| Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Mar 2 2006, 01:00 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Guests |
We may have at least a preliminary answer to one of their test very soon thanks to Monday's Titan pass that included some Radio Science doppler experiments. From the paper: "If a subsurface ammonia–water ocean and a rocky core are present, as predicted by our model, Titan's tidal secondary potential Love number k2 should be higher than 0.3 and its moment of inertia factor C/MR2 should be lower than 0.33; these quantities should be measured by the Radio Science Subsystem later in the mission" It's possible but very tough with just the T11 data. I think RSS won't be comfortable with a Love number until all the gravity data come in (i.e., T22, T33, and T38). |
|
|
|
AlexBlackwell Scientists Solve the Mystery of Methane in Titan's Atmosphere Mar 1 2006, 07:07 PM
BruceMoomaw Judging from the LPSC abstracts, Tobie's is ac... Mar 1 2006, 11:45 PM
The Messenger QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Mar 1 2006, 04:45 PM... Mar 2 2006, 03:55 PM
AlexBlackwell QUOTE (The Messenger @ Mar 2 2006, 03:55 ... Mar 2 2006, 04:35 PM
The Messenger QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Mar 2 2006, 09:35 ... Mar 2 2006, 07:13 PM
AlexBlackwell QUOTE (The Messenger @ Mar 2 2006, 07:13 ... Mar 2 2006, 11:04 PM
volcanopele QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Mar 1 2006, 06:00 ... Mar 2 2006, 01:03 AM
AlexBlackwell QUOTE (volcanopele @ Mar 2 2006, 01:03 AM... Mar 2 2006, 01:12 AM
hendric QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Mar 1 2006, 07:12 ... Mar 2 2006, 04:19 AM
AlexBlackwell QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Mar 2 2006, 01:12 ... Mar 3 2006, 05:19 PM
remcook a start...
http://www.spenvis.oma.be/spenvis/ecss... Mar 2 2006, 01:40 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th December 2024 - 10:49 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|