My Assistant
Science (March 10, 2006) |
Mar 9 2006, 04:25 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 563 Joined: 29-March 05 Member No.: 221 |
Nasa Watch is reporting that we shoud expect a large announcement from the Cassini team today:
My wild speculation is that it will be a subsurface ocean confirmed on enceladus. Hence more potentially habitable real eastate in the solar system. Heads up anyone? |
|
|
|
![]() |
Mar 9 2006, 10:09 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
I'm getting a brief note posted based on a chat with John Spencer; thought you all would enjoy the full text of what he told me.
QUOTE We've refined our numbers a bit, we've gone through our highest resolution data and we've found a few areas of somewhat higher temperatures than we'd seen then. In July we were talking 125 K, now the highest we've actually seen in our entire data set is 145 Kelvin.
We're looking at black body radiation, so the wavelength distribution of the emission tells you the temperature. The warmer it is, the shorter the wavelength of the emission. And because we're looking at solid surfaces and most of those behave like pretty respectable black bodies, just by looking at the shape of the thermal emission as a function of wavelength you can get the temperature pretty well. In this case, the job is simpler because the background is way colder. Even though, for instance, 145 Kelvin we have one spectrum that covers an area 6 by 6 kilometers. And we have just a few percent of that area that's 145 Kelvin, and the rest of it is at 70 or something much colder. But the heat radiation we see is completely dominated by that little bit of hot stuff. The liquid water is all coming from the imaging team and their analysis of the plume. I guess they're figuring that the density of the particles they're seeing in these plume images is just too great to be explicable by water gas entraining particles, but I haven't looked at those calculations. Even they are saying this is an inference, not a direct detection. When we fly past again in 2008, we'd like to look down the throat of these cracks and see 273-Kelvin temperatures down there, and we'll certainly try that. Its approach is over the north pole, and it departs over the south pole. It's convenient for CIRS and it's inconvenient for most people, the problem being that right after the flyby Enceladus goes in to Saturn's shadow. So by the time the spacecraft is turned around to look back at the south pole, we won't be able to see the south pole in sunlight, so there won't be much in the way of images. We're perfectly happy; it eliminates all of the competition! We'll be getting good stuff. And I think that VIMS, if there's really stuff at 270 Kelvin, it should be warm enough for them to see emission at shorter wavelengths as well. Certainly at 5 microns, probably around 3 microns. People have always invoked ammonia slurries as a way of lowering the melting point way down to about 175 Kelvin and allowing melting and geologic activity and volcanism on these cold objects. And this has been a tidy theory until we got the Enceladus data and seen NO sign of ammonia. Last time I checked, the mass spectrometer people had no sign of ammonia. It doesn't mean there's none there, but it's not got much -- there's more carbon dioxide than there is ammonia, for instance. We're just not seeing ammonia anywhere. If there is ammonia inside Pluto, and there probably is because there's nitrogen and ammonia is probably where the nitrogen came from, then there could be enough internal heat on Pluto, which has no tidal heat, but there could be enough radioactive heat that you might get some activity. The fact that Triton, which also has no internal heat source, also has this very exotic surface, clearly has signs of very recent geologic activity, implies that you can do stuff with just radioactive heat that far out in the solar system for a reasonably large object like Triton or Pluto. The thing about Enceladus is that it's so tiny that the radiogenic heat, it's very unlikely that it could do much of anything, and tidal heating is the only plausible heat source. It's a matter of getting the internal structure right and then explaining why Mimas, which should have a lot more tidal heating, has absolutely none. It's closer in, and its orbit is way more eccentric. Probably part of the explanation is that it has to be warm in order to stay warm. We need to have a fairly soft squishy dissipative interior in order to generate enough heat to keep it soft and squishy and dissipative. If you were to freeze Enceladus solid, take it out of orbit, freeze it, and put it back where it is, it would just be too cold to get that engine started again. At Mimas that engine never started. But why that engine started on Enceladus and not on Mimas we just don't know. -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
|
paxdan Science (March 10, 2006) Mar 9 2006, 04:25 PM
AlexBlackwell Note that NASAWatch/Spaceref is in its "break... Mar 9 2006, 04:26 PM
JRehling QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Mar 9 2006, 08:26 ... Mar 9 2006, 04:44 PM

paulanderson QUOTE (JRehling @ Mar 9 2006, 08:44 AM) I... Mar 9 2006, 05:31 PM


AlexBlackwell QUOTE (paulanderson @ Mar 9 2006, 05:31 P... Mar 9 2006, 05:35 PM


paulanderson QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Mar 9 2006, 09:35 ... Mar 9 2006, 05:49 PM

RGClark QUOTE (JRehling @ Mar 9 2006, 04:44 PM) T... Mar 9 2006, 07:44 PM

ljk4-1 Is there any way to check the water spewing from E... Mar 9 2006, 07:47 PM

JRehling QUOTE (RGClark @ Mar 9 2006, 11:44 AM) It... Mar 9 2006, 07:54 PM

helvick QUOTE (JRehling @ Mar 9 2006, 07:54 PM) I... Mar 9 2006, 08:04 PM

volcanopele QUOTE (JRehling @ Mar 9 2006, 12:54 PM) I... Mar 9 2006, 08:04 PM
brachiopod FYI, "drudge" is reporting that they wil... Mar 9 2006, 04:44 PM

helvick QUOTE (brachiopod @ Mar 9 2006, 04:44 PM)... Mar 9 2006, 04:51 PM

AlexBlackwell QUOTE (brachiopod @ Mar 9 2006, 04:44 PM)... Mar 9 2006, 05:16 PM
AlexBlackwell QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Mar 9 2006, 04:26 ... Mar 9 2006, 09:37 PM
elakdawalla QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Mar 9 2006, 01:37 ... Mar 9 2006, 09:44 PM
AlexBlackwell QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Mar 9 2006, 09:44 PM... Mar 9 2006, 09:52 PM
AlexBlackwell Note to whoever merged the two threads: If possib... Mar 9 2006, 04:42 PM
volcanopele The Enceladus would make a good name for a car tha... Mar 9 2006, 05:46 PM
AlexBlackwell Cassini Finds Signs of Liquid Water on Saturn... Mar 9 2006, 06:24 PM
elakdawalla JPL's release is out via email, but it hasn... Mar 9 2006, 07:07 PM
David QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Mar 9 2006, 07:07 PM... Mar 10 2006, 02:22 AM
volcanopele By my watch, it is after 2pm EST. WOOHOO!... Mar 9 2006, 07:07 PM
alan QUOTE Report: NASA Will Not Announce Life Find
NA... Mar 9 2006, 07:14 PM
scalbers Looks like NASA TV will have this momentarily Mar 9 2006, 07:25 PM
volcanopele thanks for the heads up Mar 9 2006, 07:31 PM
scalbers Hi again,
As you may have seen, NASA TV had a 2:3... Mar 9 2006, 07:39 PM
paxdan I would be curious to hear discussion as to what w... Mar 9 2006, 08:07 PM
The Messenger QUOTE (paxdan @ Mar 9 2006, 01:07 PM) I w... Mar 9 2006, 09:30 PM
paulanderson Good write-up on CICLOPS (Captain's Log):
htt... Mar 9 2006, 09:04 PM
BruceMoomaw Given all the effort I've put lately into flat... Mar 9 2006, 09:56 PM
volcanopele I'm done talking to reporters today...
though... Mar 9 2006, 10:09 PM
AlexBlackwell QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Mar 9 2006, 10:09 PM... Mar 9 2006, 10:30 PM
volcanopele For those of you in the Tucson area, look for me o... Mar 9 2006, 10:53 PM
belleraphon1 Ok...
here I am the old foggie......
Enceladu... Mar 9 2006, 11:48 PM
AlexBlackwell Cassini Images of Enceladus Suggest Geysers Erupt ... Mar 9 2006, 11:52 PM
BruceMoomaw Bob Pappalardo just helpfully sent me the Porco an... Mar 10 2006, 06:08 AM
elakdawalla QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Mar 9 2006, 10:08 PM... Mar 10 2006, 06:16 AM
The Messenger QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Mar 9 2006, 11:16 PM... Mar 10 2006, 06:42 AM

RGClark QUOTE (The Messenger @ Mar 10 2006, 06:42... Mar 10 2006, 06:46 PM
AlexBlackwell QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Mar 10 2006, 06:16 A... Mar 10 2006, 04:07 PM
AlexBlackwell QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Mar 10 2006, 04:07... Mar 10 2006, 11:03 PM
Anne Verbiscer I wouldn't be too quick to dismiss ammonia on ... Mar 10 2006, 08:58 PM
volcanopele QUOTE (Anne Verbiscer @ Mar 10 2006, 01:5... Mar 10 2006, 09:21 PM

Anne Verbiscer QUOTE (volcanopele @ Mar 10 2006, 04:21 P... Mar 10 2006, 11:34 PM

djellison QUOTE (Anne Verbiscer @ Mar 10 2006, 11:3... Mar 11 2006, 12:24 AM


AlexBlackwell QUOTE (djellison @ Mar 11 2006, 12:24 AM)... Mar 11 2006, 12:37 AM

jmknapp QUOTE (Anne Verbiscer @ Mar 10 2006, 06:3... Mar 11 2006, 01:42 AM

Bob Shaw Are the physical properties of amorphous water ice... Mar 11 2006, 10:52 AM
AlexBlackwell QUOTE (Anne Verbiscer @ Mar 10 2006, 08:5... Mar 10 2006, 10:32 PM
volcanopele Wow, it's been a crazy couple of days. First,... Mar 10 2006, 09:04 PM
AlexBlackwell QUOTE (volcanopele @ Mar 10 2006, 09:04 P... Mar 10 2006, 09:10 PM
AlexBlackwell PIA07800 looks to be another iconic Cassini image.... Mar 11 2006, 01:04 AM
helvick QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Mar 11 2006, 01:04... Mar 11 2006, 09:08 PM
ugordan If you're gonna decimate a huge mosaic like th... Mar 11 2006, 09:38 PM
AlexBlackwell QUOTE (helvick @ Mar 11 2006, 09:08 PM) I... Mar 12 2006, 09:39 PM
BruceMoomaw QUOTE (jmknapp @ Mar 11 2006, 01:42 AM) N... Mar 11 2006, 01:30 PM
jmknapp QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Mar 11 2006, 08:30 A... Mar 11 2006, 02:42 PM
dvandorn So.... Enceladus may well have a subsurface ocean ... Mar 11 2006, 04:00 PM
Bob Shaw QUOTE (dvandorn @ Mar 11 2006, 04:00 PM) ... Mar 11 2006, 05:06 PM
jmknapp But methane is odorless so it shouldn't detrac... Mar 11 2006, 07:28 PM
AlexBlackwell I'm not sure how many people read Caltech... Jun 17 2006, 12:14 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 04:54 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|