My Assistant
Summary of geology and rock types at Opportunity site |
Mar 20 2006, 07:42 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 320 Joined: 19-June 04 Member No.: 85 |
Well, it's literally been months in the making -- on and off, whenever I've had some spare time -- but I finally finished a compilation on the geology of the different rock types that were observed by Opportunity on it's trek from Eagle to Erebus craters. In a way, it was good that Opportunity hadn't moved very far since last November. This way my update is still up to date
So if you have some spare time, have a look. There's a lot of info there, which I hope will serve as a useful guide once we get to see some deeper layers at Victoria. The link to the write up is on my homepage. Cheers, Aldo.
-------------------- |
|
|
|
![]() |
Mar 22 2006, 05:06 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2228 Joined: 1-December 04 From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA Member No.: 116 |
That reminds me of something I wanted to mention from LPSC. We've heard comments previously from the team that Opportunity was moving up-section as it traversed southward. We could even see for ourselves the south dipping beds at Payson An updated stratigraphic section was shown by John Grotzinger and Scott McLennon in their LPSC presentations, but I couldn't sketch it because it was shown so briefly. It appeared to be an updated version of the one in Grotzinger's Power Point presentation, "The 2004 Mars Exploration Rover Mission-Evidence for Water and Prospects for Life." I borrowed the original schematic section from his presentation which is available at http://www.esi.utexas.edu/outreach/prevlectures.html.
What I was able to notice from my brief glimpses of the updated version was that they had added a short section to the top, apparently because they think what was seen at Erebus was at least somewhat higher stratigraphically than the rocks at Endurance and Eagle. I also noticed that it had another, higher contact labelled as the "Mogollon Contact." The Wellington contact has been described as an interdune deflationary surface possibly controlled by a paleo water table. The Whatanga contact was described by McLennon and Grotzinger as a place where the water table may have remained stable for some time, creating secondary porosity and recrystallization. McLennon went on to suggest that he sees as many as four movements of the paleo-water table, but neither he nor Grotzinger actually mentioned the new Mogollon Contact, so I have no idea what they think it is. I meant to ask about that, but I became sidetracked by other things and forgot to do so. Since then I have gone back to the Mogollon and Payson Panoramas to try to identify a contact of some kind, but it is not apparent to me. -------------------- ...Tom
I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast. |
|
|
|
aldo12xu Summary of geology and rock types at Opportunity site Mar 20 2006, 07:42 AM
CosmicRocker Nice work again, Aldo. This kind of on line refer... Mar 20 2006, 07:26 PM
aldo12xu Thanks, Tom.
Now that I can, so to speak, step ba... Mar 21 2006, 08:05 PM
Bill Harris Thanks for the update on the stratigraphy of the B... Mar 22 2006, 10:38 AM
aldo12xu OK, that makes sense now. The Erebus rocks repres... Mar 22 2006, 03:44 PM
AlexBlackwell QUOTE (aldo12xu @ Mar 20 2006, 07:42 AM) ... Mar 23 2006, 10:46 PM
BruceMoomaw Actually, my reasoning has always been more along ... Mar 23 2006, 10:57 PM
dvandorn Remember, when speaking of the general slope over ... Mar 24 2006, 05:14 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 01:52 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|