My Assistant
Summary of geology and rock types at Opportunity site |
Mar 20 2006, 07:42 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 320 Joined: 19-June 04 Member No.: 85 |
Well, it's literally been months in the making -- on and off, whenever I've had some spare time -- but I finally finished a compilation on the geology of the different rock types that were observed by Opportunity on it's trek from Eagle to Erebus craters. In a way, it was good that Opportunity hadn't moved very far since last November. This way my update is still up to date
So if you have some spare time, have a look. There's a lot of info there, which I hope will serve as a useful guide once we get to see some deeper layers at Victoria. The link to the write up is on my homepage. Cheers, Aldo.
-------------------- |
|
|
|
![]() |
Mar 24 2006, 05:14 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
Remember, when speaking of the general slope over distance and how that might affect what we're rolling over stratigraphically, that the surface may not have always reposed at the same slope that we see today.
As Aldo captured so well, this area seems to have seen repeated episodes of deposition, each involving long periods with high water tables and then undergoing evaporation and salt cementation. When supported by a water table, such a landfill assumes a pretty flat surface. The deposited material fills in the uneven terrain that underlies it -- and on Mars after the LHB, most of the terrain was pretty uneven. As the water table recedes, the loosely consolidated sand and cemented sandstone tends to contract and slump a bit. This allows subtle surface expressions of underlying terrain. Of course, buried terrain closest to the surface is expressed the most. So, it's possible that ridges and depressions expressed faintly in the current topography reflect larger and more impressive terrain that lies beneath. In this case, except for minor amounts of deflation and additional deposition that may have occurred over the millennia, the overall surface can be considered a single, relatively flat unit that is draped over expressions of underlying topography. Thus, when taking into account deflation and deposition that has occurred slowly since the great dry-out, any given stratigraphic level on the surface is likely to be within a few feet of the level at any other given point. Or, in more basic terms -- take a lasagna and plop it down on top of a big meatball. The lasagna will have a bulge in its top (an expression of the underlying meatball), and as you traverse along the top of the lasagna you may find local variations in the thickness of the cheese and sauce layers atop the highest noodle layer. But you're ultimately traversing the same stratigraphic unit that you would have seen had the lasagna never been dropped onto the meatball. -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
aldo12xu Summary of geology and rock types at Opportunity site Mar 20 2006, 07:42 AM
CosmicRocker Nice work again, Aldo. This kind of on line refer... Mar 20 2006, 07:26 PM
aldo12xu Thanks, Tom.
Now that I can, so to speak, step ba... Mar 21 2006, 08:05 PM
CosmicRocker That reminds me of something I wanted to mention f... Mar 22 2006, 05:06 AM
Bill Harris Thanks for the update on the stratigraphy of the B... Mar 22 2006, 10:38 AM
aldo12xu OK, that makes sense now. The Erebus rocks repres... Mar 22 2006, 03:44 PM
AlexBlackwell QUOTE (aldo12xu @ Mar 20 2006, 07:42 AM) ... Mar 23 2006, 10:46 PM
BruceMoomaw Actually, my reasoning has always been more along ... Mar 23 2006, 10:57 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 01:27 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|