My Assistant
Site Message
Mars Orbiter Resolution Simulation, MOC, THEMIS, HRSC, MARCI, CTX & HiRISE |
 Mar 20 2006, 01:12 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Founder  Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1  |
http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/doug_im...s_orbit_res.wmv ( 8 Meg )
Simulated resolution of the various cameras on orbit at Mars right now - all the way from 100000 to 30 cm  At least - once the FTP is back up and running. Grrrr.. I just hope Google Maps don't try and send me to jail for using their pictures  Doug |
 |
 
|
 |
|
Mar 21 2006, 09:53 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
11cm is too high - the best quoted res is 25 or 30 depending on where you look, and as MC will tell you, the likely resolution is probably more likely to be double that.
Doug |
|
|
|
| Guest_Sunspot_* |
Mar 21 2006, 10:27 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Guests |
QUOTE (djellison @ Mar 21 2006, 09:53 AM)  11cm is too high - the best quoted res is 25 or 30 depending on where you look, and as MC will tell you, the likely resolution is probably more likely to be double that. Doug Isnt that the same as many of the MGS images? With that special technique they've got down to 50cm. MRO isn't going to be much of an improvement over MGS? |
|
|
|
|
Mar 21 2006, 11:33 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14457 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
QUOTE (Sunspot @ Mar 21 2006, 10:27 AM) Isnt that the same as many of the MGS images? With that special technique they've got down to 50cm. MRO isn't going to be much of an improvement over MGS? The very best resolution at which imagery is taken with MOC is about 1.5m across track and 0.5m down track. MRO can take imagery at 0.3m across and down track. Now - the actual resolving power is up for debate Doug |
|
|
|
djellison Mars Orbiter Resolution Simulation Mar 20 2006, 01:12 PM
Bob Shaw Doug:
Very informative - thanks! It puts it a... Mar 20 2006, 01:23 PM
helvick Doug - you may have just found a good use for the ... Mar 20 2006, 02:38 PM djellison I actual visited it. Bloody terrible it was.
I p... Mar 20 2006, 02:52 PM mcaplinger QUOTE (djellison @ Mar 20 2006, 05:12 AM)... Mar 20 2006, 03:42 PM djellison I knew you'd appear in here I was thinking t... Mar 20 2006, 03:55 PM Bob Shaw QUOTE (djellison @ Mar 20 2006, 03:55 PM)... Mar 20 2006, 06:35 PM paxdan QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Mar 20 2006, 06:35 PM) ... Mar 20 2006, 08:01 PM crabbsaline HiRise Site Sample Image has a zoom to 11 cm / pix... Mar 21 2006, 01:23 AM edstrick MRO will have higher signal-to-noise and higher NA... Mar 21 2006, 10:32 AM Sunspot So maybe this simulated view of Mars Polar Lander ... Mar 21 2006, 01:31 PM djellison Yes - exactly.
Doug Mar 21 2006, 01:46 PM Decepticon I was wondering if JPL can use the imaging techniq... Mar 22 2006, 01:45 PM mcaplinger QUOTE (Decepticon @ Mar 22 2006, 05:45 AM... Mar 22 2006, 02:19 PM djellison QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Mar 22 2006, 02:19 PM... Mar 22 2006, 02:39 PM |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th December 2024 - 07:07 AM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|
