IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Huygens probe question
Steffen
post Mar 25 2006, 05:28 PM
Post #1


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 72
Joined: 22-December 05
Member No.: 616



Which device made the Huygens probe spin underneath its satellite?
I read that's the way how 360° images were made during descent...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Guest_BruceMoomaw_*
post Apr 3 2006, 01:24 PM
Post #2





Guests






We got all the radar data (which started at 45 km altitude) even without Channel A. Except for the extremely data-intensive images (without which Huygens' bit rate could have been cut by a factor of 10), all the data was entirely duplicated on both channels, except for a few of the very high-speed surface VNIR spectra obtained just before landing.

We also have good already-published sonar data on Huygens' descent rate during its last 90 meters -- and it shows a nice, steady descent, except for one brief jump of about 2 meters that is thought to be due to its drifting horizontally over a very small bluff.

Really, if any extraordinary jumping around such as you posit had occurred, it would have been mentioned by at leaat one experimenter -- and almost certainly more than one. I've just been going again over the published results from the ASI, DISR, SSP and DWE experimenters -- and not one mentions any such extraordinary phenomena as you mention occurring at ANY altitude. Figure 5 of Lebreton's "Nature" article -- http://www.iwf.oeaw.ac.at/files/lebreton_et_al_2005a.pdf -- shows a graph of Huygens' altitude and descent rate over time as calculated by all onboard instruments, and there are no signs of it ever dropping fast enough to keep the heat shield pinned onto it for more than a few seconds, even given its violent jerking around due to wind turbulence under the big main chute between 145 and 115 km altitude. After that it cut the big chute loose and descended under the smaller stabilizer chute, with the result that its jerking from the turbulence immediately and drastically dropped, and disappeared completely under 60 km altitude -- after which it descended very smoothly all the way to the surface. Fulchignoni's HASI article -- including the data from the accelerometers -- is at http://www.iwf.oeaw.ac.at/files/fulchignoni_et_al_2005a.pdf and makes no mention of any such peculiarities.

Your obsessive pursuit ot this idea is starting to remind me of Captain Ahab, and we all know what happened to HIM.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Steffen   Huygens probe question   Mar 25 2006, 05:28 PM
- - centsworth_II   I believe the probe had fins attached that were to...   Mar 25 2006, 05:39 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   Yeah, it had small vanes on the outer edges of its...   Mar 25 2006, 10:11 PM
- - Decepticon   ^That works with me. I never heard of the radio ...   Mar 26 2006, 04:00 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   They had to do some careful checking of the antenn...   Mar 26 2006, 05:44 AM
- - Richard Trigaux   Any object under a parachute rotates naturally. Th...   Mar 26 2006, 08:45 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   See page 15 of Lebreton's article on Huygens (...   Mar 26 2006, 11:02 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   That same diagram revealed something else that I h...   Mar 26 2006, 11:52 AM
|- - The Messenger   QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Mar 26 2006, 04:52 A...   Mar 28 2006, 03:56 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   In this connection, one COSPAR abstract seems to s...   Mar 26 2006, 01:44 PM
- - PhilCo126   Well, I'm still amazed how the Cassini-Huygens...   Mar 28 2006, 03:38 PM
- - djellison   Do you not think that if the descent profile were ...   Mar 28 2006, 04:09 PM
|- - The Messenger   QUOTE (djellison @ Mar 28 2006, 09:09 AM)...   Mar 28 2006, 05:05 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   "In principle, the water-ice value could have...   Mar 28 2006, 08:07 PM
- - The Messenger   I talked to Dr. Waffle again last night, about hea...   Mar 29 2006, 08:47 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   Unconvincing. Take a look at those three mass spe...   Mar 30 2006, 04:28 AM
|- - The Messenger   QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Mar 29 2006, 09:28 P...   Mar 30 2006, 06:43 AM
- - djellison   Are you refering to this one? http://esamultimedi...   Mar 30 2006, 09:25 AM
|- - The Messenger   QUOTE (djellison @ Mar 30 2006, 02:25 AM)...   Mar 31 2006, 05:54 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   More to the point, if the heat shield had broken a...   Mar 31 2006, 07:46 AM
|- - The Messenger   QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Mar 31 2006, 12:46 A...   Mar 31 2006, 08:52 PM
|- - djellison   QUOTE (The Messenger @ Mar 31 2006, 08:52...   Mar 31 2006, 08:58 PM
- - Big_Gazza   These sections of Huygens descent imaging triads (...   Mar 31 2006, 11:00 AM
|- - edstrick   Big Gazza: "I'm sure these images have ca...   Mar 31 2006, 11:49 AM
|- - The Messenger   QUOTE (edstrick @ Mar 31 2006, 04:49 AM) ...   Apr 1 2006, 09:42 PM
|- - BruceMoomaw   QUOTE (The Messenger @ Apr 1 2006, 09:42 ...   Apr 2 2006, 05:25 AM
|- - djellison   QUOTE (The Messenger @ Apr 1 2006, 09:42 ...   Apr 2 2006, 11:20 AM
|- - Bob Shaw   Doug: There *is* unambiguous evidence that the re...   Apr 2 2006, 12:00 PM
||- - ugordan   QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Apr 2 2006, 01:00 PM) A...   Apr 2 2006, 01:45 PM
||- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (ugordan @ Apr 2 2006, 02:45 PM) Yo...   Apr 2 2006, 02:25 PM
||- - ugordan   QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Apr 2 2006, 03:25 PM) A...   Apr 2 2006, 02:49 PM
||- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (ugordan @ Apr 2 2006, 03:49 PM) Th...   Apr 2 2006, 02:55 PM
|- - The Messenger   QUOTE (djellison @ Apr 2 2006, 05:20 AM) ...   Apr 3 2006, 05:32 AM
- - djellison   Just throwing this one into the mix... Did the la...   Mar 31 2006, 12:02 PM
- - edstrick   Assuming my hypothesis is correct. the image BRIGH...   Mar 31 2006, 12:27 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   It was instantly clear from looking at the photos ...   Apr 1 2006, 09:28 AM
- - djellison   We're not after the sun - we just want to know...   Apr 2 2006, 03:26 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   While it's certainly permissible that we don...   Apr 2 2006, 07:45 PM
- - djellison   Point 1 is mute - channel A was lost. (and it was ...   Apr 3 2006, 06:34 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   We got all the radar data (which started at 45 km ...   Apr 3 2006, 01:24 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 08:37 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.