My Assistant
Titan and Enceladus on NOVA PBS-TV, "Voyage to the Mystery Moon(s)" |
Mar 30 2006, 09:43 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
NOVA
"Voyage to the Mystery Moon" Tuesday, April 4, 2006 8 - 9:00 pm ET Chronicling a bold voyage of discovery -- the Cassini/Huygens mission to Saturn and its enigmatic moon Titan -- this program delivers awe-inspiring images of these fascinating planetary bodies nearly a billion miles from Earth. (CC, Stereo, DVI) Listen online to what the Huygens probe recorded during its nail-biting descent through Titan's atmosphere and find out how space sounds differ from those on Earth. http://www.pbs.org/nova/titan -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Apr 19 2006, 09:12 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 3242 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
I just saw the documentary "Titan – A Place Like Home?", that apparently aired on the BBC last year. This was essentially the same thing as the Nova program, with a few key differences. The Nova program was much more comprehensive with the entire Cassini mission, and because of that, a lot of the detailed explanations in the Horizons program were cut out. The Horizons program was much better put together, telling more cohesive story without repeating the same computer generated graphics and negative images (like those of a basaltic lava flow made to look like a cryolava flow) ad nauseum. The Horizons program focused more on Huygens and its results at Titan, which allowed the story to make a lot more sense. In the Nova program, the backstory to the mission, the prelaunch/pre-arrival stuff seemed to cover too much of the program, leaving too little room for science. In the Horizons program, since the story focused more on Huygens, the backstory didn't feel so overwelming. The added time not lost to the rings or Enceladus (or the added Cassini stuff), also allowed for more detailed and coherent explanations for Huygens trials and tribulations, plus better explanations on Titan. This was lost in the Nova program, making it seem more like a showcase for the CGI rather than for the science or the people and the spacecraft behind the science.
The original Horizons program was on the Discovery Channel IIRC so perhaps those who missed this nova program can catch the original, and IMHO better, version there. -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
|
Apr 22 2006, 07:34 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 624 Joined: 10-August 05 Member No.: 460 |
...The Horizons program was much better put together, telling more cohesive story without repeating the same computer generated graphics and negative images (like those of a basaltic lava flow made to look like a cryolava flow) ad nauseum... Is it unreasonable to call this manipulating the data to make it look like preconceptions of what the moon should look like? Or are these basaltic flows from other places? Who is making these type of editing decisions? I missed the NOVA presentation, but my carpool did not. They don't follow Titan closely, and thought it was very good. Are we going for the warm fuzzy here, or looking for answers to hard questions? |
|
|
|
Apr 24 2006, 03:06 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
Is it unreasonable to call this manipulating the data to make it look like preconceptions of what the moon should look like? Or are these basaltic flows from other places? Who is making these type of editing decisions? I missed the NOVA presentation, but my carpool did not. They don't follow Titan closely, and thought it was very good. Are we going for the warm fuzzy here, or looking for answers to hard questions? It's that hard balance between education and entertainment to keep the viewers, especially the non-space buff crowd - and it all has to be done in less than sixty minutes. You don't have to throw an entire encyclopedia of knowledge at once at those you are trying to inform - indeed, it is often better not to, unless you want to overwhelm and turn them off. If those novices who viewed this program and others like it are interested in learning more, they will do so. -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
|
ljk4-1 Titan and Enceladus on NOVA PBS-TV Mar 30 2006, 09:43 PM
ljk4-1 Next on NOVA: "Voyage to the Mystery Moon... Apr 1 2006, 06:44 PM
Mariner9 I wasn't all that impressed with the NOVA prog... Apr 21 2006, 07:48 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th December 2024 - 08:37 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|